And so what ?
In OpenArena's case, last stable releases were:
* 0.8.5: 02/23/2010
* 0.8.1: 10/31/2008
You can't blame OpenArena's maintainer for that, do you ?
The same goes for Wesnoth, 1.8.1 maintenance release was issued 2 May
so less than two weeks ago (1.8 was released 1st april !)
Best reg
On 05/11/2010 11:44 AM, James Antill wrote:
> Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make anyone
> think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates with a
> combined size of _over_ 750MB on x86_64, biggest 5 are:
>
> 6.2M wesnoth-1.8.1-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
> 12M hanazo
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 8:14 AM, James Antill wrote:
> Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make anyone
> think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates with a
> combined size of _over_ 750MB on x86_64, biggest 5 are:
>
> 6.2M wesnoth-1.8.1-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
>
Author: mmaslano
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib/F-12
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv14088
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib.spec sources
Log Message:
* Tue May 11 2010 Marcela Mašláňová 2.027-1
- update version
Index: .cvsignor
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 07:56 +0530, arvind iyer wrote:
> USB-MODEM from Huawei (Model: Huawei EC1261 ) does not work with
> fedora-12 (kernel 2.6.32.11-.fc12.i686.PAE)
>
>
> However an older version (Model: Huawei EC1260) works on the same
> kernel.
>
>
> The following are the output of /var/l
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Thomas Janssen
wrote:
> What was that for? To start another flamewar including the challenge
> for a explicit person?
Quite, a possibly valid point losing out to a flamebait codicil.
-Cam
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
Compose started at Tue May 11 03:30:24 UTC 2010
Updated Packages:
mojito-0.21.7-4.fc13
* Mon May 10 2010 Jesse Keating - 0.21.7-4
- Fix epoch in -devel requires
Summary:
Added Packages: 0
Removed Packages: 0
Modified Packages: 1
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fed
On 05/11/2010 09:56 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 07:56 +0530, arvind iyer wrote:
>> USB-MODEM from Huawei (Model: Huawei EC1261 ) does not work with
>> fedora-12 (kernel 2.6.32.11-.fc12.i686.PAE)
>>
>>
>> However an older version (Model: Huawei EC1260) works on the same
>> ker
> It is not part of a default package set.
Even if it were, blocking bugfixes in order to reduce updates size is
nothing but stupid.
We have presto/deltarpm for that (since these packages mostly contain
unchanged binary data like images, it should work pretty well).
What's the point in having new
Hello,
rpm automagically add some other requirements from your rpm, but
in this case I'm not sure from where. Also I didn't find
the correct 'indent' on cpan.
You can upload your srpm on web and ask on perl-devel list for help.
Maybe someone would know what's wrong with this package.
Best regard
On 05/11/2010 02:00 PM, H. Guémar wrote:
>> It is not part of a default package set.
>>
> Even if it were, blocking bugfixes in order to reduce updates size is
> nothing but stupid.
> We have presto/deltarpm for that (since these packages mostly contain
> unchanged binary data like images, it
On 10 May 2010 22:15, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
> According to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435625#c21
> policykit doesn't allow the yum backend of PackageKit (which is running as
> root) to mount devices.
That was the case a long time ago, but that's not been true for very
many mon
On 11 May 2010 07:14, James Antill wrote:
> Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make anyone
> think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates with a
> combined size of _over_ 750MB on x86_64, biggest 5 are:
I wonder what the number is for packages on the deskto
On 11 May 2010 04:23, Jesse Keating wrote:
> and a devel ack. Should a bug receive these acks, the blocker flag
> would automatically move from ? to + and we'd have ourselves a blocker!
> Some of you may find this familiar if you've dealt with RHEL products.
I use this daily when working on RHEL
Hi
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The current version has security
issues and breaks multiplayer in a couple of Quake3 based games such as
OpenArena. The maintainer has not responded in bugzilla since March and
has not responded to pri
* Richard Hughes [11/05/2010 11:05] :
>
> I wonder what the number is for packages on the desktop spin? I guess
> that's a bit more reasonable.
I'm left wondering what problem we're trying to solve here. I'm gussing
it's one of :
* there are too many updates (for whom? how is this a problem?)
* t
On Tue, 11 May 2010 14:37:22 +0530, Rahul wrote:
> Hi
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
>
> Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The current version has security
> issues and breaks multiplayer in a couple of Quake3 based games such as
> OpenArena. The maintainer has no
2010/5/11 Rahul Sundaram
> Hi
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
>
> Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The current version has security
> issues and breaks multiplayer in a couple of Quake3 based games such as
> OpenArena. The maintainer has not responded in bugzilla s
Michael Schwendt wrote, at 05/11/2010 06:37 PM +9:00:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 14:37:22 +0530, Rahul wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
>>
>> Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The current version has security
>> issues and breaks multiplayer in a couple of Q
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 20:23 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> So, I know a lot of you out there hate bugzilla flags, but I think we
> have problem with the current way we manage release blocker issues, and
> flags offer a potential solution.
>
> First the problem:
>
> Right now, anybody can propose
On 05/11/2010 03:26 PM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> Xavier responsed to rubygem-json related bug recently:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589801
>
> So I guess trying to re-contact him is better.
>
And meanwhile leave the unaddressed security issues and prominent bugs
open for more da
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 03:29:53PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 03:26 PM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> > Xavier responsed to rubygem-json related bug recently:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589801
> >
> > So I guess trying to re-contact him is better.
> >
>
> And mea
Here I forward the summary report written by James:
Greetings folks,
First ... awesome work to all involved with bringing the number of OPEN
F13Blocker bugs down to 0. This allowed F-13-RC1 to be delivered on
schedule [1] to QA for verification. Second, also in the awesome
category, several vol
Am Dienstag, den 11.05.2010, 02:14 -0400 schrieb James Antill:
> Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make anyone
> think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates with a
> combined size of _over_ 750MB on x86_64,
This number is kind of irrelevant as nobody will
On 05/11/2010 03:43 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
> Do we have a security team who evaluate security issues that are filed
> against any package, and who have the privileges to immediately fix the
> CVE should the maintainer not be responsive enough wrt the severity of
> the security problem ?
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Mamoru Tasaka
wrote:
> Michael Schwendt wrote, at 05/11/2010 06:37 PM +9:00:
>> On Tue, 11 May 2010 14:37:22 +0530, Rahul wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
>>>
>>> Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The current versi
> Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make anyone
> think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates with a
> combined size of _over_ 750MB on x86_64, biggest 5 are:
yeah, over 750 MB where 584 MB belongs to wesnoth and openarena. So without
these two games it's
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 04:38:53PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 03:43 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >
> > Do we have a security team who evaluate security issues that are filed
> > against any package, and who have the privileges to immediately fix the
> > CVE should the maintai
Compose started at Tue May 11 08:15:07 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.11
almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.8
anjal-0.3.2-2.fc14.i686 r
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I don't think either wesnoth or openarena are on the desktop spin.
> They are probably only on the games spin. So the impact of those,
> really should not be that big. (Compared to say the effect an openoffice.org
> would have.)
... and wesnoth multiplayer doesn't work on
On 05/11/2010 01:14 AM, James Antill wrote:
> Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make anyone
> think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates with a
> combined size of _over_ 750MB on x86_64, biggest 5 are:
>
> 6.2M wesnoth-1.8.1-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
> 12M hana
On 05/11/2010 04:07 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
>
> Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The current version has security
> issues and breaks multiplayer in a couple of Quake3 based games such as
> OpenArena. The maintainer has not resp
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:18:23 +0200,
Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Richard Hughes [11/05/2010 11:05] :
> >
> > I wonder what the number is for packages on the desktop spin? I guess
> > that's a bit more reasonable.
>
> I'm left wondering what problem we're trying to solve here. I'm gussing
> it
Hi Fedora paackager community,
Marc asked me to forward this to the list because of some mail account
issues. He's released ownership of the packages listed below.
Paul
- Forwarded message from Marc Wiriadisastra -
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 23:59:27 +0800
From: Marc Wiriadisastra
To: Paul
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 13:08:53 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 03:43 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > Do we have a security team who evaluate security issues that are filed
> > against any package, and who have the privileges to immediately fix the
> > CVE should the maintainer not be respo
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Crypt-DSA/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv777
Modified Files:
perl-Crypt-DSA.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-Crypt-DSA.spec
===
RCS fi
Hello,
I'm attaching list of failure. Some of them will be still
fixable by simple rebuild. It's 133 build failures.
perl-Acme-PlayCode
perl-Apache2-SOAP
perl-Apache-Session-Wrapper
perl-Archive-RPM
perl-B-Hooks-EndOfScope
perl-Calendar-Simple
perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView
perl-Catalyst-Authenti
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Crypt-Random/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv4480
Modified Files:
perl-Crypt-Random.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-Crypt-Random.spec
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 16:19 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > Let me reverse the question: How did they gather the community input?
> > >From whom it was gathered?
> > What was the question?
> > What was the answer?
> >
> > - Gilboa
> >
> >
>
> Most likely by reading or participating in the vario
Yesterday I got this dependency error from yum on Fedora 12:
Error: Paquete: usb_modeswitch-1.1.2-3.fc12.x86_64 (updates)
Necesita: usb_modeswitch-data
Did I perhaps cause something to break in F-12 with my F-11 update?
I don't remember building anything for F-12. The last F-12 build
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Data-Buffer/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv3325/EL-6
Modified Files:
perl-Data-Buffer.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-Data-Buffer.spec
==
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Data-Buffer/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv3325/devel
Modified Files:
perl-Data-Buffer.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-Data-Buffer.spec
On 05/11/2010 03:42 PM, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm attaching list of failure. Some of them will be still
> fixable by simple rebuild. It's 133 build failures.
> perl-FreezeThaw
... builds after having upgraded it (package is in rawhide, but not in
perl-f14-perltest, yet).
> perl-Gnom
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Digest-MD2/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv29674/devel
Modified Files:
perl-Digest-MD2.spec
Log Message:
* Tue May 11 2010 Paul Howarth 2.03-14
- Use %{?perl_default_filter} for provides filter
Index: perl-Dig
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Digest-MD2/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv29674/EL-6
Modified Files:
perl-Digest-MD2.spec
Log Message:
* Tue May 11 2010 Paul Howarth 2.03-14
- Use %{?perl_default_filter} for provides filter
Index: perl-Diges
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Date-Simple/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12558/devel
Modified Files:
perl-Date-Simple.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-Date-Simple.spec
===
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Date-Simple/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12558/EL-6
Modified Files:
perl-Date-Simple.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-Date-Simple.spec
=
On 05/11/2010 04:21 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> Author: pghmcfc
>
> Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Date-Simple/EL-6
> In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12558/EL-6
>
> Modified Files:
> perl-Date-Simple.spec
> Log Message:
> Minor clean-ups
>
>
> Index: perl-Date-Simple.spec
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:30:41AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 04:07 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
> >
> > Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The current version has security
> > issues and breaks multiplayer in a coup
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Multiplex/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv20953/EL-6
Modified Files:
perl-IO-Multiplex.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-IO-Multiplex.spec
==
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Multiplex/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv20953/devel
Modified Files:
perl-IO-Multiplex.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-IO-Multiplex.spec
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 01:14 AM, James Antill wrote:
>> Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make anyone
>> think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates with a
>> combined size of _over_ 750MB on x86_64, biggest 5 a
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Jcode/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv376/devel
Modified Files:
perl-Jcode.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-Jcode.spec
===
RCS file: /
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Jcode/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv376/EL-6
Modified Files:
perl-Jcode.spec
Log Message:
Minor clean-ups
Index: perl-Jcode.spec
===
RCS file: /cv
I made an operating system based on fedora and open suse if anyone will test
it email me a lamabo...@gmail.com
--
Lama boy ;-)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Andy Shevchenko
>> wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> Nowadays the jack project has two branches - old jack (1) branch with
>>> version 0.116.2 and new one called jack2 version 1.9.3.
>>> I'd like to gather opinions and
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
--
= Weekly KDE Summary
Author: stevetraylen
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Event/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv13694
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Event.spec sources
Log Message:
Update 1.13.
Index: .cvsignore
===
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 10:11 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> And if that principled approach is not the most popular.. it doesn't
> mean its worth giving up. We need to shake loose the idea that being
> the most popular matters. What I want is contributor targets to shoot
> for. I want a clear vision
On 11/05/10 15:47, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 04:21 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
>> Author: pghmcfc
>>
>> Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Date-Simple/EL-6
>> In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12558/EL-6
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> perl-Date-Simple.spec
>> Log Message:
>>
On 05/11/2010 05:48 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On 11/05/10 15:47, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 05/11/2010 04:21 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
>>> Author: pghmcfc
>>>
>>> Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Date-Simple/EL-6
>>> In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12558/EL-6
>>>
>>> Modified Fil
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:14:27AM -0600, jerrick Davis wrote:
>I made an operating system based on fedora and open suse if anyone will test
>it email me a lamabo...@gmail.com
Please stop sending this email. We have enough trouble getting people to test
our own OS. We don't need you using this l
On 11/05/10 16:58, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 05:48 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
>> On 11/05/10 15:47, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>> On 05/11/2010 04:21 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Date-Simple/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject
On 05/11/2010 01:12 AM, H. Guémar wrote:
> And so what ?
>
> In OpenArena's case, last stable releases were:
> * 0.8.5: 02/23/2010
Feb 2nd, 2010 - that's a long time ago.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>
> ...
> [6]mediatomb -- MediaTomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux
>
I'll take this one. Co-maintainers welcome.
Rich
>
>
>
> - End forwarded message -
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.f
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Math-GMP/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv25938
Modified Files:
perl-Math-GMP.spec
Log Message:
* Tue May 11 2010 Paul Howarth 2.06-4
- Don't clobber ~/.gnupg
Index: perl-Math-GMP.spec
=
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 02:14:58AM -0400, James Antill wrote:
>
> Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make anyone
> think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates with a
> combined size of _over_ 750MB on x86_64, biggest 5 are:
>
> 6.2M wesnoth-1.8.1-1.fc13.x8
On 05/11/2010 06:05 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 01:12 AM, H. Guémar wrote:
>> And so what ?
>>
>> In OpenArena's case, last stable releases were:
>> * 0.8.5: 02/23/2010
>
> Feb 2nd, 2010 - that's a long time ago.
You said that, because you haven't seen really the oldest packag
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 10:30 +0200, H. Guémar wrote:
> > It is not part of a default package set.
>
> Even if it were, blocking bugfixes in order to reduce updates size is
> nothing but stupid.
It wasn't bugfixes, it was a new upstream release, and yes size does
matter. All mirrors, public and p
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 04:38:53PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 03:43 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >
> > Do we have a security team who evaluate security issues that are filed
> > against any package, and who have the privileges to immediately fix the
> > CVE should the maintai
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 08:29 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 01:14 AM, James Antill wrote:
> > Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make anyone
> > think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates with a
> > combined size of _over_ 750MB on x86_64, biggest
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:14 PM, James Antill wrote:
> 6.2M wesnoth-1.8.1-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
> 12M hanazono-fonts-20100222-2.fc13.noarch.rpm
> 48M xmoto-0.5.3-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
> 260M wesnoth-data-1.8.1-1.fc13.noarch.rpm
> 318M openarena-0.8.5-1.fc13.noarch.rpm
>
> ...the last being particularly
On Tue, 11 May 2010 13:10:42 +0200, Xavier wrote:
> >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
> I definitively missed that one.
Like to comment on your other packages? Are there any packages where
you would appreciate co-maintainers?
For example, "soundconverter" has 8 open tic
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 13:10:42 +0200, Xavier wrote:
>
>> >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
>
>> I definitively missed that one.
>
> Like to comment on your other packages? Are there any packages where
> you would app
On Tue, 11 May 2010 12:00:47 -0400
Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:14:27AM -0600, jerrick Davis wrote:
> >I made an operating system based on fedora and open suse if anyone
> >will test it email me a lamabo...@gmail.com
>
> Please stop sending this email. We have enough trouble g
On 05/11/2010 06:27 PM, James Antill wrote:
> As I said in another reply, there are currently no deltarpms for
> wesnoth-data due to it's size.
Then fix this deficiency of your process and provide them.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
On Tue, 11 May 2010 17:19:41 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 02:14:58AM -0400, James Antill wrote:
> >
> > Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make
> > anyone think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates
> > with a combined size
On Mon, 10 May 2010 20:23:17 -0700
Jesse Keating wrote:
...snip...
> What say you?
I like it. It's not perfect, but I think it could make for a better
procedure. :) Lets give it a try for f14 if we can.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedor
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 12:23 -0400, James Antill wrote:
> Within Fedora deltarpms have a limit of applying only to rpms less than
> 100MB, so there are no deltarpms. Anyone who wants to blame rel-eng for
> that is free to fix the delarpm code...
On that subject, anyone who wants to fix this would
On Tue, 11 May 2010 15:37:51 +0200
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 May 2010 13:08:53 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > On 05/11/2010 03:43 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > Do we have a security team who evaluate security issues that are
> > > filed against any package, and who have the privileg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591215
Vincent Danen changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-POE-Component-IRC: arbitrary IRC command execution due to
insufficient stripping of CR/LF [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591216
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591215
Vincent Danen changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> It's unfortunate that these two big packages didn't make it into the
> base repo, but such is life. ;(
As this is the first time we've done the early branching... I
certainly expect mistakes right around the time of the branch freeze
and for
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Math-GMP/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv30344
Modified Files:
perl-Math-GMP.spec
Log Message:
* Tue May 11 2010 Paul Howarth 2.06-4
- Don't clobber ~/.gnupg
- No perl(Test::YAML::Meta) in EPEL yet
- No aspell dic
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 10:57 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Does that have anything to do with me adding 2 bugs to the blockers the
> day before the go/no-go meeting?
Nope, not at all. It's very important that everybody still be able to
propose blockers as easily as possible. Checking a flag is
Xose Vazquez Perez (xose.vazq...@gmail.com) said:
> On 05/11/2010 06:05 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
>
> > On 05/11/2010 01:12 AM, H. Guémar wrote:
> >> And so what ?
> >>
> >> In OpenArena's case, last stable releases were:
> >> * 0.8.5: 02/23/2010
> >
> > Feb 2nd, 2010 - that's a long time a
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 18:44 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 06:27 PM, James Antill wrote:
> > As I said in another reply, there are currently no deltarpms for
> > wesnoth-data due to it's size.
> Then fix this deficiency of your process and provide them.
>
>
>
Patches welcome.
--
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:27:30 -0500,
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > I don't think either wesnoth or openarena are on the desktop spin.
> > They are probably only on the games spin. So the impact of those,
> > really should not be that big. (Compared to say the effect
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 12:31 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> This seems like rather a major shortcoming in our processes. A security
> team whom can merely file bugs & has no power to ensure security flaws
> are fixed in a timely manner is not good for Fedora.
>
Sure would be good to have volu
On 05/11/2010 07:03 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 18:44 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 05/11/2010 06:27 PM, James Antill wrote:
>>>As I said in another reply, there are currently no deltarpms for
>>> wesnoth-data due to it's size.
>> Then fix this deficiency of your proce
On 05/11/2010 12:05 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 12:31 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
>> This seems like rather a major shortcoming in our processes. A security
>> team whom can merely file bugs& has no power to ensure security flaws
>> are fixed in a timely manner is n
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 19:10 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 07:03 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 18:44 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> On 05/11/2010 06:27 PM, James Antill wrote:
> >>>As I said in another reply, there are currently no deltarpms for
> >>> wesno
On Tue, 11 May 2010 10:33:49 -0400, Bernie wrote:
> Yesterday I got this dependency error from yum on Fedora 12:
>
> Error: Paquete: usb_modeswitch-1.1.2-3.fc12.x86_64 (updates)
>Necesita: usb_modeswitch-data
>
> Did I perhaps cause something to break in F-12 with my F-11 update?
W
Dne 10.5.2010 20:11, Jeff Spaleta napsal(a):
> And if that principled approach is not the most popular.. it doesn't
> mean its worth giving up. We need to shake loose the idea that being
> the most popular matters.
PREACH IT!!! PREACH IT, BROTHER!!!
--
The American Republic will endure, until po
On 05/11/2010 07:01 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 10:57 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> Does that have anything to do with me adding 2 bugs to the blockers the
>> day before the go/no-go meeting?
>
> Nope, not at all. It's very important that everybody still be able to
> propose
On 05/11/2010 07:12 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 19:10 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
>> On 05/11/2010 07:03 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 18:44 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>>
On 05/11/2010 06:27 PM, James Antill wrote:
On 05/11/2010 09:35 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 01:12 AM, H. Guémar wrote:
>
>> And so what ?
>>
>> In OpenArena's case, last stable releases were:
>> * 0.8.5: 02/23/2010
>>
> Feb 2nd, 2010 - that's a long time ago.
>
Yep. The primary maintainer at that time recently
On 05/11/2010 06:27 PM, James Antill wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 08:29 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> , and we now have
>> deltarpms (and a huge thank to to all responsible there), so I really
>> don't think it's that big of an issue.
>
> As I said in another reply, there are currently no deltar
On 05/11/2010 10:31 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> I think the point is that if the release was done in
> February, there's really no reason it should be a F-13
> *update* at GA.
>
The reason is that it is *game* and it is not part of the default set.
Anyone who chooses to install it will get an
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
