2010/5/10 Orcan Ogetbil
>
> Yeah that is one of the only two swami commits in the last 2 years.
>
> Anyway, do we have a Fedora policy to remove software just because
> they are old and unmaintained upstream? If there is a happy userbase
> and a maintainer willing to take care of the package, wha
On Sun 9 May 2010 11:31:21 pm Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 05/10/2010 01:23 AM, Léon Keijser wrote:
> > I still use an old nethack-like game that unfortunately depends on gtk
> > 1.2. Since i'll never be able to get it into Fedora, i just install gtk
> > myself then i'm good to go again. I woul
On Mon 10 May 2010 12:01:01 am Chen Lei wrote:
> Considering fedora 13 just remove ppc arch to secondary arch, it's
> meaningful for fedora to retire some long dead upstream packages as well.
> Maybe it's suitable to retire gtk 1.2 in F14 or F15, then remove it to
> rpmfusion for a compatible reaso
2010/5/10 Ryan Rix
> On Sun 9 May 2010 11:31:21 pm Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > On 05/10/2010 01:23 AM, Léon Keijser wrote:
> > > I still use an old nethack-like game that unfortunately depends on gtk
> > > 1.2. Since i'll never be able to get it into Fedora, i just install
> gtk
> > > myself
On Sunday 09 May 2010 19:13:57 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > I think it would be better to drop ntp support completely from s-c-d once
> > chrony becomes default in Fedora. We aim to support default Fedora
> > configuration tools. Radek Novacek is now working on date/time DBus
>
Andreas Bierfert írta:
> On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 12:20 +0200, drago01 wrote:
>
>> 2010/5/8 Zoltan Boszormenyi :
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> the latest version of Wine found in koji is 1.1.38, which was released
>>> in february this year. The latest mainstream Wine is 1.1.44.
>>>
>>> Why isn't there a
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 01:15:03PM -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
> I find that having NTP enabled in most cases for mobile systems is simply
> unnecessary; there is a large (I would say upwards of 95% in my most
> unscientific guessings) chance that these users aren't going to be doing
> anything which
On 05/09/2010 02:28 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 09/05/10 13:34, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
>> If you have not see this at all, I've seen this frequently. Fedora
>> sucks in this area for many years. I've seen it, so whatever
>> arguments you bring; I KNOW that this bug IS very important and
>> shou
On 10/05/10 10:08, Andrew Haley wrote:
--snip--
>
> This is a bad argument IMO. Many users are advanced in some areas,
> but not others. The whole idea that "Fedora is a distro for advanced
> users therefore it should be hard to use" is absurd.
How is it hard to use? excl. patented stuff.
I c
Dne 10.5.2010 06:54, Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
> Have you ever talked to Ubuntu/openSUSE users and listened to their
> replies when telling them you are using Fedora?
>
> You will hear answers along the line of too much inconvenience to get
> multimedia working, too unstable (in the sense of low MT
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Dne 10.5.2010 06:54, Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
>> Have you ever talked to Ubuntu/openSUSE users and listened to their
>> replies when telling them you are using Fedora?
>>
>> You will hear answers along the line of too much inconvenience to get
Dne 10.5.2010 11:26, drago01 napsal(a):
> To have stuff just work.
Go to http://senate.gov/ and ask your congressman to fix it. Otherwise
(for example if you don't have your congressman because you are not a
U.S. citizen), you can also try to move Red Hat's headquarters outside
of U.S. (althoug
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Dne 10.5.2010 11:26, drago01 napsal(a):
>> To have stuff just work.
>
> Go to http://senate.gov/ and ask your congressman to fix it. Otherwise
> (for example if you don't have your congressman because you are not a
> U.S. citizen), you can also
On 05/10/2010 11:18 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Dne 10.5.2010 06:54, Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
>> Have you ever talked to Ubuntu/openSUSE users and listened to their
>> replies when telling them you are using Fedora?
>>
>> You will hear answers along the line of too much inconvenience to get
>> multime
Dne 10.5.2010 11:35, drago01 napsal(a):
> I didn't say that we can fix it; just that it *is* easier in other
> distributions.
Which don't have principal headquarters of their sponsor in US (but on
the Isle of Man, which was chosen exactly because of its lax legal and
especially tax, true, regime
On 05/10/2010 10:16 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 10/05/10 10:08, Andrew Haley wrote:
> --snip--
>>
>> This is a bad argument IMO. Many users are advanced in some areas,
>> but not others. The whole idea that "Fedora is a distro for advanced
>> users therefore it should be hard to use" is absurd.
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 11:45:49AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> > With the latest improvements in the chrony package related to
> > NetworkManager and name resolving I think it is now good enough to
> > replace ntpd in the default c
On 10/05/10 10:54, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 05/10/2010 10:16 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
--snip--
>>
>> Look earlier in the thread,
>> how to mount a DVD as a repo has been demonstrated.
>
> Yes, it has. And it's more difficult that installing from the repos.
> Which was my point.
>
> Andrew.
But t
On Mon, 10 May 2010 02:09:45 -0400, Orcan wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Chen Lei wrote:
> >
> > As I mentoned below, some packges need update to the
> > lastest release badly to get rid of gtk+ 1.2. And some packages can safely
> > retire from fedora, e.g. xmms.
> >
>
> At that point
Hi,
What is the status of support for the Realtek 8192se WiFi
controller in F12 and F13?
I see in some wiki page a reference to the Realtek website,
at least for (stock) F12.
Is this chipset in the meantime supported in the F12 kernel
and/or will it be supported in F13?
Thanks,
--
--Jos Vo
On So, 2010-05-09 at 11:45 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
[...]
> 1) Why chrony? Why not OpenNTPD [fill in the blank here]
Dunno if this is important for this discussion but the portable version
of OpenNTPD is stuck. The last portable version was made available in
May 2006 while the OpenBSD ve
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:33 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Dne 10.5.2010 11:26, drago01 napsal(a):
> > To have stuff just work.
>
> Go to http://senate.gov/ and ask your congressman to fix it. Otherwise
> (for example if you don't have your congressman because you are not a
> U.S. citizen), you can
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:23 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 10 May 2010 02:09:45 -0400, Orcan wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Chen Lei wrote:
>> >
>> > As I mentoned below, some packges need update to the
>> > lastest release badly to get rid of gtk+ 1.2. And some packages can s
On 05/10/2010 12:38 PM, Jos Vos wrote:
> What is the status of support for the Realtek 8192se WiFi
> controller in F12 and F13?
staging drivers are out of Fedora kernel, only crystalhd is
included.
see http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers/rtl819x
--
«Allá muevan feroz guerra, ciegos reyes
Hi,
After I did yum update today morning(May 10'Th), I'm facing a weird login
problem. None of the authentications - gdm login, su - user, or ssh from a
remote host etc. are being resolved.
Even passwd(1) segfaluts while changing password.
I just can't login to the machine, in any way.
did
On 05/10/2010 02:46 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Look earlier in the thread,
> how to mount a DVD as a repo has been demonstrated.
>
> All it takes is adding method to wiki.
> "How to use DVD\CD as repo
>
Frank,
We are trying to make the process easier by making it a click through
process. It do
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 16:25 +0530, P J P wrote:
>
> Updated nss-softokn-3.12.4-15.fc12.i686
> Update 3.12.4-17.fc12.i686
> Updated nss-softokn-devel-3.12.4-15.fc12.i686
> Update 3.12.4-17.fc12.i686
> Updated nss-softokn-f
On 10/05/10 12:10, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
--snip--
>> All it takes is adding method to wiki.
>> "How to use DVD\CD as repo
>>
>
> Frank,
>
> We are trying to make the process easier by making it a click through
> process.
It doesn't help if you insist that it can be done manually.
> Everyone
Dne 10.5.2010 12:48, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> That's the wrong argument. We all know why we _can't_ make it just work,
> but that doesn't excuse us. Sorry to take a well-worn analogy, but if
> two guys are trying to sell you cars, and one doesn't have an engine,
> would the fact that the guy se
On 05/10/2010 04:48 PM, Frank Murphy wrote
> Hi Rahul,
> Check my reply from 11:04
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-May/135944.html
> Should work for F13+
> even for new users.
>
What you describe is not as easy as enabling any other repository and
there is no reason it sho
Hello,
I don't have the time to maintain calibre any more so I'm orphaning it.
I fell behind on bugzilla, too.
Beware, it requires a lot of love. Upstream moves very fast. Releases
happen weekly and there are always new features and sometimes new
bundled libs (yeah...).
Whoever picks this up
On 10/05/10 12:25, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
--snip--
>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-May/135944.html
>> Should work for F13+
>> even for new users.
>>
>
> What you describe is not as easy as enabling any other repository
How is it not as easy?
fedora-release*rpm
contains re
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 13:21 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Dne 10.5.2010 12:48, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> > That's the wrong argument. We all know why we _can't_ make it just work,
> > but that doesn't excuse us. Sorry to take a well-worn analogy, but if
> > two guys are trying to sell you cars, and
On 05/10/2010 05:06 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 10/05/10 12:25, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> --snip--
>
>>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-May/135944.html
>>> Should work for F13+
>>> even for new users.
>>>
>>>
>> What you describe is not as easy as enabling any other
On 10/05/10 12:48, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
--snipp--
>>>
>> How is it not as easy?
>>
>
> It is not a click through process.
>
> Rahul
How can you not click if it shows up in
gnome-packagekit-extra?
(admin/software/sources)
Will not the packages be availabel in add\remove?
They are on my
On Mon, 10 May 2010 06:49:23 -0400, Orcan wrote:
> >> At that point you break a cult. xmms still has a stubbornly loyal fan
> >> base (just go to #fedora and start talking about it).
> >
> > Why don't they take care of http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/xmms and
> > additional tickets that have been "h
On 05/10/2010 05:22 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 10/05/10 1
> How can you not click if it shows up in
> gnome-packagekit-extra?
> (admin/software/sources)
>
> Will not the packages be availabel in add\remove?
>
> They are on my tests.
>
> No user intervention required.
> (allow for the fact my test
On 10/05/10 13:02, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
--snipp--
>
> DVD repo does NOT show up automatically in the repository listing when
> you install gnome-packagekit-extras.
I said if DVD.repo is releases with fedora-release*
it *will* show up in default
There are manual fiddling involved
> in setting
On 05/10/2010 05:36 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 10/05/10 13:02, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> --snipp--
>
>
>> DVD repo does NOT show up automatically in the repository listing when
>> you install gnome-packagekit-extras.
>>
> I said if DVD.repo is releases with fedora-release*
> it *will* sho
On Mon, 10 May 2010, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Not sure that people are still unaware of that issue, but, anyway,
> here is my problem: I added RSS-filter to my blog, to properly sort
> out off-topic or unappropriate content from my diary and make it
> suitable for inclusion into Fedora
--- On Mon, 10/5/10, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Downgrade this.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504949
Hey thanks, it worked.
Thank you.
---
Regards
-Prasad
PS: Please don't send me html/attachment/Fwd mails
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.
On 10/05/10 13:10, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
--snip--
>
> DVD repo is clearly not part of fedora-release at the moment. We are
> talking about the current reality. If you file a RFE and get
> fedora-release updated, then it will become easier but that is not the
> case now.
>
> Rahul
Neither is
On 05/10/2010 05:43 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Neither is fixing the RFE for PK, as it's notabug.
> But I firmly believe
> creting a text file, is the easier\maybe safer challenge.
>
PackageKit developers disagree with you. Since they are the ones doing
the work involved, their opinion has more
On 10/05/10 13:28, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> PackageKit developers disagree with you. Since they are the ones doing
> the work involved, their opinion has more weight. Besides a static repo
> file is less flexible than the ability for PackageKit to handle media
> dynamically. Meanwhile, you c
Compose started at Mon May 10 08:15:15 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.11
almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.8
anjal-0.3.2-2.fc14.i686 r
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:38:15PM +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the status of support for the Realtek 8192se WiFi
> controller in F12 and F13?
>
> I see in some wiki page a reference to the Realtek website,
> at least for (stock) F12.
>
> Is this chipset in the meantime supported in t
/*Frank Murphy */ wrote on 05/10/2010 5:11:13 PM +0450:
On 10/05/10 13:28, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
PackageKit developers disagree with you. Since they are the ones doing
the work involved, their opinion has more weight. Besides a static repo
file is less flexible than the ability for Pack
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 17:58 +0430, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
>
> Anyway, thinking about the problem with DeviceKit system policies, I
> really feel that the current situation is flawed: a process running as
> root is able to mount a device either by calling mount system call or
> by running the mo
On 10/05/10 14:28, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
--snip--
>
> Anyway, thinking about the problem with DeviceKit system policies, I
> really feel that the current situation is flawed: a process running as
> root is able to mount a device either by calling mount system call or by
> running the mount comm
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Ryan Rix wrote:
> Here is how I see this: The user installs their system for the first time,
> they set their clock using NTP while they have the connection to the
> internet when they installed their packageset/updates. Now they have an
> accurate clock.
>
> How mu
/*Adam Williamson */ wrote on 05/10/2010 3:18:06 PM
+0450:
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:33 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
Dne 10.5.2010 11:26, drago01 napsal(a):
To have stuff just work.
Go to http://senate.gov/ and ask your congressman to fix it. Otherwise
(for example if you don't
On 10/05/10 15:05, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
--snipp--
http://omega.dgplug.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 12:38 +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the status of support for the Realtek 8192se WiFi
> controller in F12 and F13?
>
> I see in some wiki page a reference to the Realtek website,
> at least for (stock) F12.
>
> Is this chipset in the meantime supported in the F12
Patrice Dumas wrote:
> * xdialog is build twice, once agains gtk+ and then against Gtk2. I think
> it would be nice to keep it that way, though you could also convince the
> current maintainer to keep only the Gtk2 stuff. also xdialog seems to be
> pretty dead upstream too, though I still ha
On ۱۰/۰۵/۱۰ 06:38, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 10/05/10 15:05, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
> --snipp--
>
> http://omega.dgplug.org/
>
Thanks, I thought that the project is dead (IIRC, it was not provided
for F11 last time I checked, but apparently I'm wrong). I'll contact him
to see if he is int
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 00:04 -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
>
> That doesn't mean we should throw it to the wayside. If it works, it works.
> As
> long as someone is there to maintain it, let them maintain it. If the
> maintainer is willing to keep it going, who cares whether it's in the distro?
> In
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:45 AM, Yaakov M. Nemoy
wrote:
> On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 01:15:03PM -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
>> I find that having NTP enabled in most cases for mobile systems is simply
>> unnecessary; there is a large (I would say upwards of 95% in my most
>> unscientific guessings) chance
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
>
> Adam Williamson wrote on 05/10/2010 3:18:06 PM +0450:
>
> On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:33 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
>
>
> Dne 10.5.2010 11:26, drago01 napsal(a):
>
>
> To have stuff just work.
>
>
> Go to http://senate.gov/ and ask your con
On Monday 10 May 2010 11:18:26 am Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> Author: itamarjp
>
> Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/redir/EL-6
> In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv20463/EL-6
>
> Modified Files:
> import.log redir.spec
> Log Message:
> - fix building for EL-6
>
>
>
> Index:
mono requires bootstrapping ?
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=172787
how to build it ?
--
Itamar Reis Peixoto
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Itamar Reis Peixoto
wrote:
> mono requires bootstrapping ?
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=172787
>
> how to build it ?
Hopefully you can disable enough features on one package such that it will
build so it can then become a dependency to
On 05/10/2010 04:01 AM, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
> I guess the legal problem(s) may come from the fact that
> newer Wine has cut out its own MP3 decoder and instead,
> it uses dlopened libmpg123. How does it differ from the
> DVD playing situation? Xine, MPlayer, etc. uses libdvdcss
> via dlopen i
On 05/10/2010 08:20 PM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
>
> On ۱۰/۰۵/۱۰ 06:38, Frank Murphy wrote:
>
>> On 10/05/10 15:05, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
>> --snipp--
>>
>> http://omega.dgplug.org/
>>
>>
> Thanks, I thought that the project is dead (IIRC, it was not provided
> for F11 last time I
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 07:28 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> I do not agree that that working with zero community input is the way to
> achieve a working compromise. (And input does not equal vote)
>
What makes you think that no community input is considered?
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> That's the wrong argument. We all know why we _can't_ make it just work,
> but that doesn't excuse us.
You are right. The answer is clearly to export US legal rules to the
rest of the world so we can have an equally unfriendly playing fiel
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> That's the wrong argument. We all know why we _can't_ make it just work,
>> but that doesn't excuse us.
>
> You are right. The answer is clearly to export US legal rules to the
> rest
Jeff Spaleta (jspal...@gmail.com) said:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > That's the wrong argument. We all know why we _can't_ make it just work,
> > but that doesn't excuse us.
>
> You are right. The answer is clearly to export US legal rules to the
> rest of the wo
Start End Name
Tue 04-May Tue 18-May Final Infrastructure Change Freeze
Tue 11-May Tue 11-May Fedora 13 Final Go/No-Go Meeting (20:00 EST)
Wed 12-May Wed 12-May Fedora 13 Final Release Readiness Meeting
Thu 13-May Thu 13-May Start Stage & Sync RC to Mirrors
Thu 13-May Tue 18-
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:36 AM, drago01 wrote:
> Fix what is broken and not break everything else so that you can
> pretend that it isn't.
Think of that opening remark as a modern twitter-friendly version of
"A Modest Proposal" given in the very same spirit of Jonathon Swift's
original.
-jef
-
On Mon, 10 May 2010 11:37:16 -0500
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Monday 10 May 2010 11:18:26 am Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> > Author: itamarjp
> >
> > Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/redir/EL-6
> > In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv20463/EL-6
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > import.l
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:36 AM, drago01 wrote:
>> Fix what is broken and not break everything else so that you can
>> pretend that it isn't.
>
> Think of that opening remark as a modern twitter-friendly version of
> "A Modest Proposal" give
>
> Or you can just use:
>
> BuildRequires: /usr/include/tcpd.h
>
> which works everywhere and you don't need conditionals.
>
> Paul.
>
seems to be interesting, but using filenames instead package names in
yum appears to be more slow, I think only in build time should not be
a problem.
--
---
On 10 May 2010 17:50, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> mono requires bootstrapping ?
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=172787
>
> how to build it ?
No, if you build against the mono.snk strong name key in /etc/pki then
there should be no bootstrapping required. This is provided
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Christopher Brown
wrote:
> On 10 May 2010 17:50, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
>> mono requires bootstrapping ?
>>
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=172787
>>
>> how to build it ?
>
> No, if you build against the mono.snk strong name key in /etc
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Module-Signature/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv30480
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Module-Signature.spec sources
Log Message:
Update to 0.64
Index: .cvsignore
=
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577790
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-10
16:15:14 EDT ---
perl-X11-Protocol-0.56-5.el5, clusterssh-3.26-2.el5 has be
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574409
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574431
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-10
16:15:53 EDT ---
perl-Sys-SigAction-0.11-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574409
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-10
16:15:36 EDT ---
perl-Net-SSH-0.09-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574431
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577790
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
On Mon, 10 May 2010 16:40:24 -0300
Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> >
> > Or you can just use:
> >
> > BuildRequires: /usr/include/tcpd.h
> >
> > which works everywhere and you don't need conditionals.
> >
> > Paul.
> >
>
> seems to be interesting, but using filenames instead package names in
> yum
Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Christopher Brown
>> No, if you build against the mono.snk strong name key in /etc/pki then
>> there should be no bootstrapping required. This is provided by
>> mono-devel I think.
> there are no mono-devel in EL-6,
>
> EL-6 not inhe
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 01:10:18AM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> hi,
>
> Long time ago, all *redhat* packages were renamed to "system*".
> But three of them are still alive: redhat-lsb, redhat-menus and
> redhat-rpm-config
>
> Should they switch to "system-" ?
>
> -thanks-
>
I think s/re
On 5/10/2010 15:46, Casey Dahlin wrote:
> On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 01:10:18AM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
>> Long time ago, all *redhat* packages were renamed to "system*".
>> But three of them are still alive: redhat-lsb, redhat-menus and
>> redhat-rpm-config
>>
>> Should they switch to "syst
On 05/11/2010 02:20 AM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> If they aren't specific to only Fedora like fedora-release and
> fedora-release-notes are, why put "fedora" in the package names at all?
>
Besides switching from Red Hat to Fedora is fairly pointless since both
names have trademark requirement
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 19:00UTC (3pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
= Followups =
#351 Create a policy for updates - status report on implementation
= New Business =
#373 erlang provides/requires explosion
#374 Mo
/*Matthias Clasen */ wrote on 05/10/2010 5:59:56 PM
+0450:
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 17:58 +0430, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
Anyway, thinking about the problem with DeviceKit system policies, I
really feel that the current situation is flawed: a process running as
root is able to mount a devic
On Mon, 10 May 2010 15:00:18 -0600
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> meeting tomorrow at 19:00UTC (3pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
> irc.freenode.net.
>
> = Followups =
>
> #351 Create a policy for updates - status report on implementa
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:05 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 07:28 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > I do not agree that that working with zero community input is the way to
> > achieve a working compromise. (And input does not equal vote)
> >
> What makes you think that no commun
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:37:16AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Monday 10 May 2010 11:18:26 am Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> > Index: redir.spec
> > ===
> > RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/redir/EL-6/redir.spec,v
> > retrieving revision 1
Fedora 13 has released Release Candidate stage. We have reached a state
where the known blockers were fixed and were able to make a release
candidate. This happened last Thursday, and almost immediately we found
a need to spin a second release candidate. From this point on, only
items critical t
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
>> > but conversely
>> > there's some weirdness with the sound driver resulting in no sound (for
>> > which I will collate some data before blindly filing a bug on that).
Ok then if no one does it (or my search skills suck...):
https://bugzilla.
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 01:28 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:05 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 07:28 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > > I do not agree that that working with zero community input is the way to
> > > achieve a working compromise. (And input
On Mon, 10 May 2010 14:25:02 +0300
"Ionuț C. Arțăriși" wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I don't have the time to maintain calibre any more so I'm orphaning
> it. I fell behind on bugzilla, too.
>
> Beware, it requires a lot of love. Upstream moves very fast. Releases
> happen weekly and there are always
Garrett Holmstrom writes:
> On 5/10/2010 15:46, Casey Dahlin wrote:
>> On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 01:10:18AM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
>>> Long time ago, all *redhat* packages were renamed to "system*".
>>> But three of them are still alive: redhat-lsb, redhat-menus and
>>> redhat-rpm-config
Compose started at Mon May 10 21:49:13 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
1:mojito-devel-0.21.7-3.fc13.i686 requires mojito = 0:0.21.7-3.fc13
Broken deps for x86_64
--
1
So, I know a lot of you out there hate bugzilla flags, but I think we
have problem with the current way we manage release blocker issues, and
flags offer a potential solution.
First the problem:
Right now, anybody can propose a release blocker bug. This is not the
problem though, the problem is
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 02:12 +, Branched Report wrote:
>
> Broken deps for i386
> --
> 1:mojito-devel-0.21.7-3.fc13.i686 requires mojito =
> 0:0.21.7-3.fc13
I've fixed this and have a new compose going.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora
On 5/10/2010 22:23, Jesse Keating wrote:
> (our?) Bugzilla already has a method for proposal and acceptance. This
> is done via flags. We currently use this for package reviews and CVS
> admin tasks. What I propose is that we introduce a new flag once we've
> branched a release and created a bug
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
