Re: Reasons for hall monitoring

2010-05-06 Thread Karel Zak
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 05:46:21PM -0400, Brian Pepple wrote: > On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 23:22 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote: > > Dne 6.5.2010 12:28, Karel Zak napsal(a): > > >> Thank you for pointing out yet another undemocratic policy passed by one > > >> of > > > > > > +1 The Hall Monitor Policy is can

rpms/perl-Test-Pod-Coverage/devel perl-Test-Pod-Coverage.spec, 1.13, 1.14

2010-05-06 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
Author: mmaslano Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Test-Pod-Coverage/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv11090 Modified Files: perl-Test-Pod-Coverage.spec Log Message: - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 Index: perl-Test-Pod-Coverage.spec ==

rpms/perl-Test-Portability-Files/devel perl-Test-Portability-Files.spec, 1.9, 1.10

2010-05-06 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
Author: mmaslano Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Test-Portability-Files/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv11520 Modified Files: perl-Test-Portability-Files.spec Log Message: - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 Index: perl-Test-Portability-Files.spec ===

Re: Reasons for hall monitoring

2010-05-06 Thread Brian Pepple
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 00:26 +0200, Karel Zak wrote: > On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 05:46:21PM -0400, Brian Pepple wrote: > > > > Normally, I'd be against it killing a thread, but the thread that > > started this discussion had already been done awhile back and this new > > thread added *nothing* new to

Re: Reasons for hall monitoring

2010-05-06 Thread Rudolf Kastl
2010/5/7 Brian Pepple : > On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 00:26 +0200, Karel Zak wrote: >> On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 05:46:21PM -0400, Brian Pepple wrote: >> > >> > Normally, I'd be against it killing a thread, but the thread that >> > started this discussion had already been done awhile back and this new >> >

rpms/perl-Test-Signature/devel perl-Test-Signature.spec,1.4,1.5

2010-05-06 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
Author: mmaslano Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Test-Signature/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv13942 Modified Files: perl-Test-Signature.spec Log Message: - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 Index: perl-Test-Signature.spec ===

Re: Reasons for hall monitoring

2010-05-06 Thread Matěj Cepl
Dne 7.5.2010 00:45, Brian Pepple napsal(a): > Please enlighten me then on what new information was added to this > thread that wasn't in the prior thread that warranted keeping it alive? Could you point out in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Hall_Monitor_Policy where it says "thread should be clo

Re: Reasons for hall monitoring

2010-05-06 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Karel Zak wrote: > On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 05:46:21PM -0400, Brian Pepple wrote: >> On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 23:22 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote: >> > Dne 6.5.2010 12:28, Karel Zak napsal(a): >> > >> Thank you for pointing out yet another undemocratic policy passed by >> > >

Re: Reasons for hall monitoring

2010-05-06 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Rudolf Kastl wrote: > one of the questions raised in the meeting posted by mcepl was... "why > dont those people leave if they are unhappy". simple... they put alot > sweat blood and tears into a project, and they have friends... with > the development crowd and wit

Re: Reasons for hall monitoring

2010-05-06 Thread Henrique Junior
2010/5/6 Orcan Ogetbil > > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Karel Zak wrote: > > On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 05:46:21PM -0400, Brian Pepple wrote: > >> On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 23:22 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote: > >> > Dne 6.5.2010 12:28, Karel Zak napsal(a): > >> > >> Thank you for pointing out yet another u

<    1   2