On 22/04/10 22:01, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
> There was only one: history-2010-03-08.sqlite
> BZ-attached here:
>
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/584997
Read up on:
yum-plugin-protect-packages
if your going on autopilot.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded, Fedora.x86 64-32 Hybrid
--
devel mai
Hi,
we're patching mozilla packages only for really critical issues because
of mozilla trademarks. We can't put any patch we want to the mozilla
package and ship it as 'Firefox' or 'Thunderbird'.
I've asked for inclusion at upstream bug,
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=550455, if y
On 04/23/2010 09:03 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we're patching mozilla packages only for really critical issues because
> of mozilla trademarks. We can't put any patch we want to the mozilla
> package and ship it as 'Firefox' or 'Thunderbird'.
Thanks for providing evidence of how trademar
On 04/23/2010 09:18 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 04/23/2010 09:03 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we're patching mozilla packages only for really critical issues because
>> of mozilla trademarks. We can't put any patch we want to the mozilla
>> package and ship it as 'Firefox' or 'Thunder
On 04/23/2010 12:33 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we're patching mozilla packages only for really critical issues because
> of mozilla trademarks. We can't put any patch we want to the mozilla
> package and ship it as 'Firefox' or 'Thunderbird'.
>
> I've asked for inclusion at upstream bug,
David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 14:03 +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
>> I would rather patch the tcl script to use the binary in /usr/bin :)
>> Unless people thing otherwise.
>
> Why deviate from what upstream does, which is to use /usr/sbin?
>
This is fixed now in
https://admi
On 04/23/2010 09:30 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 04/23/2010 12:33 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we're patching mozilla packages only for really critical issues because
>> of mozilla trademarks. We can't put any patch we want to the mozilla
>> package and ship it as 'Firefox' or 'Thunder
On 04/23/2010 01:12 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
> On 04/23/2010 09:30 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> What is the exact definition of "really critical issues" here. A
>> frequent crash seems a critical issue to me.
>
> - 0day vulnerabilities
> - critical crashes (like app fails to start for *everyone*
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
> On 04/23/2010 09:18 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 04/23/2010 09:03 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> we're patching mozilla packages only for really critical issues because
>>> of mozilla trademarks. We can't put any patch we wan
On Friday 23 of April 2010 09:03:37 Martin Stransky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we're patching mozilla packages only for really critical issues because
> of mozilla trademarks. We can't put any patch we want to the mozilla
> package and ship it as 'Firefox' or 'Thunderbird'.
just curious: is it possible to
On 04/23/2010 11:11 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> On Friday 23 of April 2010 09:03:37 Martin Stransky wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we're patching mozilla packages only for really critical issues because
>> of mozilla trademarks. We can't put any patch we want to the mozilla
>> package and ship it as 'Firefox
On 04/23/2010 09:24 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
> On 04/23/2010 09:18 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 04/23/2010 09:03 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> we're patching mozilla packages only for really critical issues because
>>> of mozilla trademarks. We can't put any patch we want to the m
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 09:40 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:08 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> >
> > I've spent a little time looking at the hardware side of things and
> > done a basic patch for some of the hardware stuff based on the current
> > rawhide comps file. I've br
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 16:45 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 21 April 2010 16:40, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > software needs to be installed for a given bit of hardware. It's
> > really the kind of thing that needs to be added to udev as just a
> > simple rule, and then enabled in gnome-packagekit.
Compose started at Fri Apr 23 08:15:03 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
evolution-couchdb-0.3.2-2.fc13.i686 requires libcouchdb-glib-1.0.so.1
metagoofil-1.4a-4.fc14.noarch requires /usr/bin/libextractor-extractor
paper
On Friday 23 April 2010 13:07:46 Rawhide Report wrote:
> Compose started at Fri Apr 23 08:15:03 UTC 2010
>
> Broken deps for i386
> --
[...]
>skyviewer-1.0.0-3.fc12.i686 requires libQGLViewer.so.2
> Broken deps for x86_64
> -
Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 22/04/10 22:01, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> There was only one: history-2010-03-08.sqlite
>> BZ-attached here:
>>
>> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/584997
>
> Read up on:
> yum-plugin-protect-packages
>
> if your going on autopilot.
Thanks. Installed.
IMHO, one should always be ab
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Frank Murphy wrote:
>> On 22/04/10 22:01, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>> There was only one: history-2010-03-08.sqlite
>>> BZ-attached here:
>>>
>>> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/584997
>>
>> Read up on:
>> yum-plugin-protect-packages
>>
>> if your going on autop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805#c28
Should we have:
postgresql-pgpool-II
postgresql-orafce
or just:
pgpool-II
orafce
Let start discussing. My opinion is postgresql-* because it has kind of
same namespace.
--
Miroslav Suchy
Red Hat Satellite Engineering
--
devel mailing list
# What: F-13 Blocker bug review
# When: Friday, 2010-04-23 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EDT)
# Where: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Today in about an hour (apologies for the late notice!) will be the
second scheduled [1] Fedora 13 Blocker bug review meeting. We'll
be reviewing all F13Blocker bugs
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 16:40 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805#c28
>
> Should we have:
> postgresql-pgpool-II
> postgresql-orafce
>
> or just:
> pgpool-II
> orafce
>
> Let start discussing. My opinion is postgresql-* because it has kind
> of same na
Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= writes:
> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 16:40 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805#c28
>>
>> Should we have:
>> postgresql-pgpool-II
>> postgresql-orafce
>>
>> or just:
>> pgpool-II
>> orafce
>>
>> Let start discussing. M
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 11:44 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= writes:
> > On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 16:40 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805#c28
> >>
> >> Should we have:
> >> postgresql-pgpool-II
> >> postgresql-orafce
> >>
R 2.11.0 is built now for Fedora and EPEL. It is in "updates-testing".
In accordance with the new policies on Fedora Updates, these new
packages will not be pushed as official updates until they either
receive positive testing from users, or sit in updates-testing for two
weeks.
You can help us t
Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Frank Murphy wrote:
>>> On 22/04/10 22:01, Jim Meyering wrote:
There was only one: history-2010-03-08.sqlite
BZ-attached here:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/584997
>>>
>>> Read up on:
>>> yum-plugin-protect-packages
>>
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Seth Vidal wrote:
>> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>> Frank Murphy wrote:
On 22/04/10 22:01, Jim Meyering wrote:
> There was only one: history-2010-03-08.sqlite
> BZ-attached here:
>
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/584997
>
A while back I was complaining about how the KDE SIG handles bug
reports. One could certainly argue that closing everything UPSTREAM
doesn't help to track bugs in Fedora, but on the other hand the bugs are
at least submitted to the original developers.
When I receive a bug report I have a look at
Christoph Wickert wrote:
> When I receive a bug report I have a look at it and if it contains all
> necessary data, I forward it to upstream's bug tracker. Most of the time
> the developers are very thankful about the reports and especially the
> backtraces. Looking at the bugs I filed I see that n
> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 11:44 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= writes:
> > On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 16:40 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805#c28
> >>
> >> Should we have:
> >> postgresql-pgpool-II
> >> postgresql-orafce
> >
Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Seth Vidal wrote:
>>> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 22/04/10 22:01, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> There was only one: history-2010-03-08.sqlite
>> BZ-attached here:
>>
>> http://bug
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
> I've just realized that I had a list of all packages/versions
> that were installed as of a few weeks ago (April 5).
> In case it helps:
>
Yah - the history sqlite file you uploaded has all that info in there (in
a round about way) but the problem sti
On 04/23/2010 08:47 PM, Jean-Francois Saucier wrote:
>> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 11:44 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= writes:
>>> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 16:40 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805#c28
Should we have
Matthias Runge writes:
> Thinking of more general packages, e.g a java binding for postgresql, I
> would prefer names like postgresql-java (or similar) to be able to
> differentiate from mysql-java, ingres-java (given, those packages do
> exist). To be conformant to this naming scheme, other pa
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 19:45 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> P.S.: Now that we gather all these data, do we need a general policy for
> it? Should the bugzappers take care of forwarding bugs?
Not really. abrt reports are bug reports on crashing applications. The
fact that they're automatically g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
With a Fedora release coming soon, it's also time for Fedora
Elections. Both the Fedora Project Board and the Fedora Engineering
Steering Committee (FESCo) will have open seats during this election
cycle.
Nominations for these seats open tomorrow, Sa
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Compose started at Fri Apr 23 09:15:03 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
metagoofil-1.4a-4.fc13.noarch requires /usr/bin/libextractor-extractor
Broken deps for x86_64
--
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 23:30 +, Branched Report wrote:
Disregard this. It was sent from the future where the world has ended
and there is no Branched tree to push.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Description: This is a di
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 15:52 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
>
> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
> > I've just realized that I had a list of all packages/versions
> > that were installed as of a few weeks ago (April 5).
> > In case it helps:
> >
>
> Yah - the history sqlite file you uploaded
On behalf of Nigel Jones, I'm letting people know that the following
packages have been orphaned:
* R-DBI -- Database interface module for R
* R-RSQLite -- SQLite database interface for R
* pAgenda -- A cross platform calendar and scheduler
* perl-Crypt-CAST5_PP -- CAST5 block cipher in pure Perl
Jim Meyering meyering.net> writes:
> IMHO, one should always be able to run "yum -y update" without fear
> of such damage. Maybe that's naive, but with the exception of
> yesterday's run, it's worked for me for more than two years of
> rawhide and F10..F13.
In x86_64 F13 and Rawhide, often depe
41 matches
Mail list logo
