b43: N-PHY

2010-04-15 Thread Bojan Smojver
Anyone knows what the status of these patches is when it comes to F-13 and higher? I'm referring to: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/1/37 Or more generally, whether the open source b43 driver knows how to drive BCM4322 chips. -- Bojan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://a

Re: Reverting kaddressbook back to previous version?

2010-04-15 Thread Juha Tuomala
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Rex Dieter wrote: > are a lot of other packages and issues and bugs involved here. Reverting > even part or all as you suggest would have far bigger bad consequences than > helping That's what I thought, it's not just a matter of yumming older stuff back. Secondly, major

Re: b43: N-PHY

2010-04-15 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 18:20 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote: > Anyone knows what the status of these patches is when it comes to F-13 > and higher? > > I'm referring to: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/1/37 > > Or more generally, whether the open source b43 driver knows how to drive > BCM4322 chips.

Re: devkit-power-daemon broken?

2010-04-15 Thread Richard Hughes
On 14 April 2010 19:02, Adam Williamson wrote: > AFAIK none of these are generic bugs. Handling AC plug/unplug is > actually not as simple as it seems, and can vary from device to device > (or, rather, ACPI implementation to ACPI implementation). So this is to > a degree system-specific. It's tot

Re: devkit-power-daemon broken?

2010-04-15 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 13:32 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 14 April 2010 19:02, Adam Williamson wrote: > > AFAIK none of these are generic bugs. Handling AC plug/unplug is > > actually not as simple as it seems, and can vary from device to device > > (or, rather, ACPI implementation to ACPI imp

Please test varnish-2.1.0-2 for F-13

2010-04-15 Thread Ingvar Hagelund
I think it's important that varnish-2.1.0-2.fc13 is included in F-13, and hope that it's not too late. It was submitted by bodhi today, and can also be downloaded from koji. Please test the update and give feedback through bodhi. Snipped from the bodhi update request: Details Upgrade t

Re: F13 Beta release notes

2010-04-15 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 06:33:38PM +0200, drago01 wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > drago01 wrote: > >> PPC is no longer a primary arch, so the wording about supporting it > >> should be removed. > > > > Sony recently removed "Other OS" support from all PS3 u

Re: F13 Beta release notes

2010-04-15 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:47:50AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 10:20 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > The Documentation team has prepared and posted a draft of the Fedora > > 13 Release Notes for the Beta release: > > > > http://docs.fedoraproject.org/drafts.html > > Th

Re: F13 Beta release notes

2010-04-15 Thread drago01
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 06:33:38PM +0200, drago01 wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> > drago01 wrote: >> >> PPC is no longer a primary arch, so the wording about supporting it >> >> should be removed.

orphaning ifd_egate

2010-04-15 Thread Robert Relyea
This package has no effective upstream. The package supports the old Schlumberger/Axalto egate token which has a built-in USB reader. This token has not been available for about 5 years. I've orphaned the package in case someone who is using the tokens still needs it. Currently there is one packag

Outage notification - koji01 kdump setup - Sat Apr 17 2010

2010-04-15 Thread Jon Stanley
Outage: setup kdump on koji01 - 2010-04-17 17:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2010-04-17 17:00 UTC, which will last approximately 2 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2010-04-17 17:00 UTC' Re

Re: devkit-power-daemon broken?

2010-04-15 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 18:10 +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 13:32 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > > On 14 April 2010 19:02, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > AFAIK none of these are generic bugs. Handling AC plug/unplug is > > > actually not as simple as it seems, and can vary from dev

gcc 4.5 released

2010-04-15 Thread Neal Becker
What is plan to introduce gcc 4.5 into fedora? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: gcc 4.5 released

2010-04-15 Thread Filipe Rosset
On 04/15/2010 04:34 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > What is plan to introduce gcc 4.5 into fedora? > F-14? -- Filipe Rosset Fedora Project rosset.fil...@gmail.com filiperos...@fedoraproject.org Rio Grande do Sul - Brazil "First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you wi

F-13 Branched report: 20100415 changes

2010-04-15 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Thu Apr 15 09:15:04 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- hornsey-1.5.2-0.1.fc13.i686 requires libclutter-gst-0.10.so.0 python-basemap-0.99.4-2.fc13.i686 requires libgeos-3.2.0.so zikula-module-menutree-2

Re: gcc 4.5 released

2010-04-15 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 17:07:55 -0300, Filipe Rosset wrote: > On 04/15/2010 04:34 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > > What is plan to introduce gcc 4.5 into fedora? > > > > F-14? I think he was expecting a bit more to a plan than just a release target. Are we going to do a mass rebuild? If so, when? H

[Test-Announce] F-13 Blocker Meeting 2010-04-16 @ 15:00 UTC (11 AM EDT)

2010-04-15 Thread James Laska
# What: F-13 Blocker bug review # When: Friday, 2010-04-16 @ 15:00 UTC (11 AM EDT) # Where: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net As if we needed another reminder that time flies, tomorrow will be the first of 4 scheduled [1] Fedora 13 Blocker bug review meetings. We'll be reviewing all F13Block

Re: potentially unmaintained packages

2010-04-15 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 08:38:52PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > seriously? I don't think I ever said the list was all inclusive. > And in my original reply I only asked some questions related to > packages being considered "potentially unmaintained". Is there a secret definition of "potentia

Re: potentially unmaintained packages

2010-04-15 Thread drago01
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 08:38:52PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> > seriously? I don't think I ever said the list was all inclusive. >> And in my original reply I only asked some questions related to >> packages being considered "potenti

Re: b43: N-PHY

2010-04-15 Thread Bojan Smojver
Bastien Nocera redhat.com> writes: > The reverse engineering isn't complete, so the n-phy version of b43 > isn't functional yet. OK, thanks for the info. Does that mean that the driver is usable with BCM4322 but won't go to N speeds, or does it mean one needs to use proprietary Broadcom driver?