Hello,
In the process of becomming a package maintainer, the following has
magically appeared when I log in to my Fedora account:
> To do queue:
> Miscellaneous Tasks
> Download a client-side certificate
I downloaded a certificate April 11, got a reciept by e-mail, and
used the certificate wit
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:03:55 -0400 (EDT), Seth wrote:
> Hi,
> I worked on a script back in January which produced a list of packages
> that needed to be looked at. The reason was that the pkg had not been
> built by koji into dist-rawhide by a non-automated process in more than 6
> months.
W
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:01:50 +0200 (CEST), Klaus wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In the process of becomming a package maintainer, the following has
> magically appeared when I log in to my Fedora account:
>
> > To do queue:
> > Miscellaneous Tasks
> > Download a client-side certificate
>
> I downloaded a
Hi all,
I was wondering if I could that last noisy fan on my pc to rest (sitting
on my 4850): Is there any part of radeon powersaving yet in fedora 12
(in what package should it be, kernel, ati or radeon)?
If so, where can I start testing?
regards
Christoph
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist
Am Dienstag, den 13.04.2010, 17:03 -0400 schrieb Seth Vidal:
> http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/potentially-unmaintained/2010-04-13/
I see packages_by_user, pkgs_with_bugs and everything. What I would like
to see is pkgs_with_bugs_by_user, because this is something that should
really consider
On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 22:30 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 20:05 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > How hard is it to use Bodhi properly?
> To be clear, there's nothing 'improper' about editing updates, it's
> common practice. You can suggest ways that the practice could be
>
>> ... the instructions there say I should wait for a fedora-cvs flag
>> ... I can find no such flag
>> ... Am I missing something? ...
>
> Things to check:
> ...
> 2) In the bugzilla ticket, do you see the "Flags:" field at the right?
> 3) If you log in, can you click "Edit" right of the "Flags:"
Hi Michael,
On 14.04.2010 09:19, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Why would it need to be rebuilt manually?
You don't need to. If a package is working perfectly fine and no update
is available there's no need to rebuild.
>> "Hey, this pkg hasn't been built, even in rawhide, in a while, maybe you
>> s
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 14:24 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > hey,
> >
> > I've had this issue for quite a while now.
> >
> > I have a HP pavilion laptop that runs a Fedora 12 (up to date) and vista
> > (the original that came with the laptop).
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:20:05 +0200, Felix wrote:
> >> "Hey, this pkg hasn't been built, even in rawhide, in a while, maybe you
> >> should 1. check that out and 2. if the pkg is dead or unmaintained
> >> consider retiring it."
> >
> > It's stable, works, and is still being used by dependencies. Wo
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 13.04.2010, 17:03 -0400 schrieb Seth Vidal:
>
>> http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/potentially-unmaintained/2010-04-13/
>
> I see packages_by_user, pkgs_with_bugs and everything. What I would like
> to see is pkgs_with_bugs_by_u
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:03:55 -0400 (EDT), Seth wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I worked on a script back in January which produced a list of packages
>> that needed to be looked at. The reason was that the pkg had not been
>> built by koji into dist-rawhide by
varnish is a high performance http accellerator.
I'm just to tag and build the new upstream version 2.1.0 of varnish.
This new version has a change in the vcl configuration language that may
need changes to existing vcl code.
If you are using varnish, please read the release notes carefully.,
htt
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 09:36:54AM +0200, Christoph Höger wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering if I could that last noisy fan on my pc to rest (sitting
> on my 4850): Is there any part of radeon powersaving yet in fedora 12
> (in what package should it be, kernel, ati or radeon)?
> If so, where c
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 02:31:42PM +0200, Ingvar Hagelund wrote:
> varnish is a high performance http accellerator.
>
> I'm just to tag and build the new upstream version 2.1.0 of varnish.
> This new version has a change in the vcl configuration language that may
> need changes to existing vcl cod
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Juha Tuomala wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, Ryan Rix wrote:
>> On Mon 12 April 2010 6:40:59 am Juha Tuomala wrote:
>>> I recall, that the earlier version had some level of Akonadi support
>>> as well, so in theory, would it be possible to revert the codebase
>>> ba
On 04/14/2010 05:20 AM, Felix Kaechele wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 14.04.2010 09:19, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
>> Why would it need to be rebuilt manually?
>
> You don't need to. If a package is working perfectly fine and no update
> is available there's no need to rebuild.
>
>>> "Hey, this pkg has
The Documentation team has prepared and posted a draft of the Fedora
13 Release Notes for the Beta release:
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/drafts.html
It's recommended that developers check out sections that are relevant
or important to them. If you find that a page needs changes, you can
use the
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:20:32 -0400,
"Paul W. Frields" wrote:
> The Documentation team has prepared and posted a draft of the Fedora
> 13 Release Notes for the Beta release:
>
> http://docs.fedoraproject.org/drafts.html
>
> It's recommended that developers check out sections that are releva
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:20:32 -0400,
"Paul W. Frields" wrote:
> The Documentation team has prepared and posted a draft of the Fedora
> 13 Release Notes for the Beta release:
>
> http://docs.fedoraproject.org/drafts.html
>
> It's recommended that developers check out sections that are releva
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> The Documentation team has prepared and posted a draft of the Fedora
> 13 Release Notes for the Beta release:
>
> http://docs.fedoraproject.org/drafts.html
PPC is no longer a primary arch, so the wording about supporting it
should be remov
Just a reminder to everyone that we're still right in the middle of
Graphics Test Week. The NVIDIA Test Day[1] yesterday went very well, and
of course you can still add results to that page if you didn't get
around to testing yet. Today is the ATI/AMD Test Day[2], so if your
graphics card is from A
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 01:50:58PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 02:31:42PM +0200, Ingvar Hagelund wrote:
> > varnish is a high performance http accellerator.
> >
> > I'm just to tag and build the new upstream version 2.1.0 of varnish.
> > This new version has a change in
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:20:05PM +0200, Felix Kaechele wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 14.04.2010 09:19, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > Why would it need to be rebuilt manually?
>
> You don't need to. If a package is working perfectly fine and no update
> is available there's no need to rebuild.
>
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 16:45 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said:
> > I'd like to retire kudzu for F-13.
> >
> > Why?
> > - There are places where it almost certainly does not work with current
> > kernels
> > - It's so deprecated that one of its replacements
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 05:03:55PM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "Hey, this pkg hasn't been built, even in rawhide, in a while, maybe you
> should 1. check that out and 2. if the pkg is dead or unmaintained
> consider retiring it."
The junction with bug information is also interesting. I t
drago01 wrote:
> PPC is no longer a primary arch, so the wording about supporting it
> should be removed.
Sony recently removed "Other OS" support from all PS3 units. Should the
Playstation line be removed as well?
(I haven't updated my PS3 yet so I can still use Fedora)
--
devel mailing list
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> drago01 wrote:
>> PPC is no longer a primary arch, so the wording about supporting it
>> should be removed.
>
> Sony recently removed "Other OS" support from all PS3 units. Should the
> Playstation line be removed as well?
The Playstat
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 09:38:03AM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 13.04.2010, 17:03 -0400 schrieb Seth Vidal:
>
> > http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/potentially-unmaintained/2010-04-13/
>
> I see packages_by_user, pkgs_with_bugs and everything. What I would like
> to see i
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 22:03 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:35:09 -0700, Jesse wrote:
>
> > >> I wonder if there's something about the commit message which
> > >> caused the report to chop it off?
> > >
> > > No, it's a [fixed] bug in repodiff, which ignores %changelog entr
> "TK" == Toshio Kuratomi writes:
TK> Querying bugzilla is a comparatively expensive process so it's
TK> probably something we need to do by syncing the count of bugs into
TK> the db via a cron job. Any takers?
I could probably whip something up.
- J<
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fe
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 6:09 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> I agree, and thought Seth made his point well. I typically consider the
> set of things in Fedora I need to worry about to be the set of bugs
> assigned to me, plus the ones I've files, plus any FTFFS or broken deps
> I'm aware of. If somethin
Compose started at Wed Apr 14 08:15:04 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
evolution-couchdb-0.3.2-2.fc13.i686 requires libcouchdb-glib-1.0.so.1
fwfstab-0.03-5.fc12.noarch requires kudzu
hornsey-1.5.2-0.1.fc13.i686 requir
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 09:19 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:03:55 -0400 (EDT), Seth wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I worked on a script back in January which produced a list of packages
> > that needed to be looked at. The reason was that the pkg had not been
> > built by koji in
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 16:44 +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> There appear to be bugs on this issue[1][2] with lengthy discussions
> already having taken place. The bug has been reported in 9/2009, which
> is 6 months back. Can the concerned maintainers please prioritize this
> bug and squash it asap? P
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:01:01 -0700, Adam wrote:
> It seems to me that Seth quite carefully wrote his email specifically to
> forestall replies of this kind. Apparently it wasn't enough...
Of course not. The subject says "potentially unmaintained packages".
The message makes a fuss about it, even
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:01:01 -0700, Adam wrote:
>
>> It seems to me that Seth quite carefully wrote his email specifically to
>> forestall replies of this kind. Apparently it wasn't enough...
>
> Of course not. The subject says "potentially unmainta
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:34:54 -0400 (EDT), Seth wrote:
> seriously? I don't think I ever said the list was all inclusive.
Me neither.
And in my original reply I only asked some questions related to
packages being considered "potentially unmaintained".
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproj
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 10:20 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> The Documentation team has prepared and posted a draft of the Fedora
> 13 Release Notes for the Beta release:
>
> http://docs.fedoraproject.org/drafts.html
Thanks for updating the system requirements. However, this looks like a
typo:
Mi
On Wed 14 April 2010 6:53:24 am Thomas Janssen wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Juha Tuomala
wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, Ryan Rix wrote:
> >> On Mon 12 April 2010 6:40:59 am Juha Tuomala wrote:
> >>> I recall, that the earlier version had some level of Akonadi support
> >>> as well,
Compose started at Wed Apr 14 09:15:04 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
gnome-shell-2.29.1-4.i686 requires gobject-introspection >= 0:0.6.9
hornsey-1.5.2-0.1.fc13.i686 requires libclutter-gst-0.10.so.0
python-basemap-0
Hi Jeff,
Good idea, also the opencv package would use this feature for its Python
programming examples. Current ABRT cannot ignore crashes based on paths,
so it must be developed.
Please file a RFE in Bugzilla, and include the filename mask(s) marking
the files you want to exclude. I think it
On Mi, 2010-04-07 at 16:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 22:30 +0200, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
> > On Mi, 2010-04-07 at 09:17 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Thanks to everyone for their testing, it's greatly appreciated. Based on
> > > the positive r
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 21:53, Karel Klic wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Good idea, also the opencv package would use this feature for its Python
> programming examples. Current ABRT cannot ignore crashes based on paths,
> so it must be developed.
>
> Please file a RFE in Bugzilla, and include the filename
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Karel Klic wrote:
> Please file a RFE in Bugzilla, and include the filename mask(s) marking
> the files you want to exclude. I think it will be something like:
> /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/scipy/*/examples/*.py
For the moment... im talking about things down
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 15:53 +0200, Thomas Janssen wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Juha Tuomala wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, Ryan Rix wrote:
> >> On Mon 12 April 2010 6:40:59 am Juha Tuomala wrote:
> >>> I recall, that the earlier version had some level of Akonadi support
> >>> as wel
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Karel Klic wrote:
> Please file a RFE in Bugzilla, and include the filename mask(s) marking
> the files you want to exclude. I think it will be something like:
> /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/scipy/*/examples/*.py
do you want that in Fedora bugzilla against ab
Matt McCutchen wrote:
> Please take the request seriously. If Tuju is right that most users
> would be better off with the older version, then that's what Fedora
> should ship.
I appreciate the comment, but that oversimplifies things quite a bit. there
are a lot of other packages and issues a
Dne 14.4.2010 22:40, Jeff Spaleta napsal(a):
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Karel Klic wrote:
>> Please file a RFE in Bugzilla, and include the filename mask(s) marking
>> the files you want to exclude. I think it will be something like:
>> /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/scipy/*/examples/*.
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 15:51 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > Please take the request seriously. If Tuju is right that most users
> > would be better off with the older version, then that's what Fedora
> > should ship.
>
> I appreciate the comment, but that oversimplifies thin
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 10:25 -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
> I suggested that Juha fix his issue by downgrading simply because of this.
> He was the same person who has been complaining about KAddressbook in 4.4
> since its initial release, two months ago.
I find that communities run better if every que
Dne 14.4.2010 22:02, Mathieu Bridon napsal(a):
> I'm not sure if that could be used for my own issues with ABRT, but
> let me explain it.
>
> When I'm developing a TG2 application, I sometimes get a traceback
> (well, I'm not perfect :). ABRT sees the traceback, and wants me to
> report a bug again
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 17:03 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> You should have given this
> answer to Tuju's original question rather than snippily dismissing it.
Whoops, sorry, I confused Rex Dieter with Ryan Rix. That remark was
meant for Ryan, not Rex.
--
Matt
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists
Ideally I think abrt's crash signature stuff ought to find two
characteristic failures are the same, and so send a reporter to
an existing bug report. Then that bug can be marked closed with
an annotation explaining what you need to install. (Of course,
it's also arguably wiser to have a hook in
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 14:14 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Ideally I think abrt's crash signature stuff ought to find two
> characteristic failures are the same, and so send a reporter to
> an existing bug report. Then that bug can be marked closed with
> an annotation explaining what you need to
I am trying to update the eclipse-egit package to 0.7.1 and it requires
eclipse-jgit >= 0.7.1 which I just built. I would like both packages to
be in updates-testing at the same time since use of the eclipse-egit
package is the real test of the eclipse-jgit package.
For rawhide, I just used th
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 17:31 -0400, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> I am trying to update the eclipse-egit package to 0.7.1 and it requires
> eclipse-jgit >= 0.7.1 which I just built. I would like both packages to
> be in updates-testing at the same time since use of the eclipse-egit
> package is the rea
On Wed 14 April 2010 2:12:36 pm Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 17:03 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > You should have given this
> > answer to Tuju's original question rather than snippily dismissing it.
>
> Whoops, sorry, I confused Rex Dieter with Ryan Rix. That remark was
> mean
I'm talking to you because I know some of you work at companies,
organizations, foundations, consortiums, and so forth. And you may be
in the perfect position to sponsor a student for Fedora Summer Coding.
We're moving the schedule back an extra month to give a chance for
more sponsors. The prop
On 4/13/2010 14:07, James Laska wrote:
> I see, thanks for the clarification. Is there a better way you would
> recommend to locate a sponsor for the packager of beakerlib (pmuller)?
Before anyone will sponsor a prospective packager the person should
first do some informal package reviews to dem
There will be another set of changes to the xorg.conf.d system, in rawhide
and F-13. This may affect your input device configuration in X. My apologies
for the inconvenience, especially after the Beta.
Long story short, when the xorg.conf.d stuff went into rawhide we (well, I,
so blame me for that
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 15:53 +0200, Thomas Janssen wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Juha Tuomala wrote:
>> > On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, Ryan Rix wrote:
>> >> On Mon 12 April 2010 6:40:59 am Juha Tuomala wrote:
>> >>> I recall, that the
62 matches
Mail list logo
