Re: non-responsive maintainer: thomasvs

On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Julian Sikorski wrote: > W dniu 03.04.2010 20:52, Felix Kaechele pisze: >> I talked to him on IRC three days ago and he accepted one of my bugs I >> filed at morituri's (a cd ripping tool of his, best there is) bugtracker. >> >> Maybe ping him on IRC. His nick is t

Fwd: Jabbin

-- Forwarded message -- From: Jabbin Date: Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 7:54 AM Jabbin Jabbin Team looks for Linux packagers Posted: 04 Apr 2010 01:45 AM PDT Jabbin is an Open Source and cross-platform application developed on qt library Released unde

What Decides Basearch?

I have created a hybrid box for myself. Kernel.x86_64 All else i686 + noarch (no problems encountered) bash-4.1$ uname -i (-m) x86_64 How would I get\force it to return i686? -- Regards, Frank Murphy UTF_8 Encoded, Fedora.x86_64/i686 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Remove of

Hallo, it may be nice, if anyone can tell me since which kernel release the file was removed. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: What Decides Basearch?

Use setarch! -of Frank Murphy schrieb: >I have created a hybrid box for myself. > >Kernel.x86_64 >All else i686 + noarch (no problems encountered) > >bash-4.1$ uname -i (-m) >x86_64 > >How would I get\force it to return i686? > > >-- >Regards, > >Frank Murphy >UTF_8 Encoded, Fedora.x86_64/i686

Re: openal-soft .pc file compiling is broken i need help please

Am 05.04.2010 03:11, schrieb Braden McDaniel: > On Sun, 2010-04-04 at 17:18 +0200, LinuxDonald wrote: > >> Am 01.04.2010 23:01, schrieb Braden McDaniel: >> > [snip] > > >>> It looks like this line in CMakeLists.txt: >>> >>> >>> SET(libdir "\${exec_prefix}/${LIB_INSTALL_DI

Re: sssd update pulling in 686 packages [Fwd: Fedora 13 updates-testing report]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/02/2010 11:44 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 09:34:31 -0600 > Orion Poplawski wrote: > >> This more of things disappearing from updates-testing before >> appearing in the main F13 repo? Multi-lib issue? > > Only sssd-client shoul

Intel's SU4100 support on Fedora 12

Hi, I own a laptop which has an Intel SU4100 (http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=43568), a dual core CPU and has 4 Gb of RAM. The Fedora 12 install DVD, picks up the PAE kernel for my machine while I expected a SMP, PAE enabled kernel instead. Is it possible to manually select such a kernel, dur

Re: Intel's SU4100 support on Fedora 12

On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Ilyes Gouta wrote: > Hi, > > I own a laptop which has an Intel SU4100 > (http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=43568), a dual core CPU and has > 4 Gb of RAM. The Fedora 12 install DVD, picks up the PAE kernel for my > machine while I expected a SMP, PAE enabled kerne

Re: Intel's SU4100 support on Fedora 12

Hi, > while), it is detected at runtime. When installing the system, right? So it's done once? I believe grub has a static configuration which indicates the location of the kernel image. > Also for this system I recommend using x86_64. I don't remember the installer giving me the choice between

Re: Intel's SU4100 support on Fedora 12

On 04/05/2010 03:10 PM, Ilyes Gouta wrote: > Hi, > > >> while), it is detected at runtime. >> > When installing the system, right? So it's done once? I believe grub > has a static configuration which indicates the location of the kernel > image. > > >> Also for this system I recommend

Re: Intel's SU4100 support on Fedora 12

On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Ilyes Gouta wrote: > Hi, > >> while), it is detected at runtime. > > When installing the system, right? So it's done once? I believe grub > has a static configuration which indicates the location of the kernel > image. No, there is only one kernel image ... the ker

i386-class support changed in F-13?

Hello, I was trying to install i686 variant of F-13 to an Alix board (2D13 with Geode LX) and got into troubles. The kernel boots fine, but when it should start initramfs the kernel panics. Everything works well when using complete F-12 environment and when using F-12 kernel+initramfs with F-13 ro

Re: What Decides Basearch?

On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Frank Murphy wrote: > I have created a hybrid box for myself. > > Kernel.x86_64 > All else i686 + noarch (no problems encountered) > > bash-4.1$ uname -i (-m) > x86_64 > > How would I get\force it to return i686? > return arch, where? you mean for $basearch? -sv -- devel

Re: Remove of

Hi > it may be nice, if anyone can tell me since which kernel release > the file was removed. 2.6.32. http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=fc5377668c3d808e1d53c4aee152c836f55c3490 Regards Rich -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://

A little help with build failure?

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for mercurial: 22eac5602d777f9601e23700e641503f mercurial-1.5.1.tar.gz OK, so why: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2095322&name=build.log says: error: File /builddir/build/SOURCES/mercurial-1.5.1.tar.gz: No such file or directory

Re: A little help with build failure?

On 04/05/2010 04:18 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > A file has been added to the lookaside cache for mercurial: > > 22eac5602d777f9601e23700e641503f mercurial-1.5.1.tar.gz > > OK, so why: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2095322&name=build.log > > says: > > error: File /builddir/buil

Re: A little help with build failure?

Neal Becker píše v Po 05. 04. 2010 v 10:18 -0400: > A file has been added to the lookaside cache for mercurial: > > 22eac5602d777f9601e23700e641503f mercurial-1.5.1.tar.gz > > OK, so why: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2095322&name=build.log > > says: > > error: File /

Re: Fedora 12: Make Dell machines boot again

On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 10:48:39PM +0200, Felix Schwarz wrote: > since the last stable kernel update in Fedora 12, a lot of Dell machines > do not boot anymore due to a kernel oops... Of course bugzilla has a > couple of bug reports (e.g. #578217, #579118, #578663, #578590). > > There is a know

(Solved) Re: What Decides Basearch?

On 05/04/10 13:57, Seth Vidal wrote: > > > On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Frank Murphy wrote: > >> I have created a hybrid box for myself. >> >> Kernel.x86_64 >> All else i686 + noarch (no problems encountered) >> >> bash-4.1$ uname -i (-m) >> x86_64 >> >> How would I get\force it to return i686? >> > > retur

rawhide report: 20100405 changes

Compose started at Mon Apr 5 08:15:09 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- banshee-mirage-0.6.0-1.fc13.i686 requires mono(Banshee.Core) = 0:1.5.0.0 banshee-mirage-0.6.0-1.fc13.i686 requires mono(Hyena) = 0:1.5.0.0 banshee

Re: Unsigned Packages - Yum/Pk

On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 12:52 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote: > PackageKit allows a forced install of unsigned pkg. > > yu does the following: > Package krb5-libs-1.7.1-7.fc13.i686.rpm is not signed > > I know about --nogpgcheck. > > But can I edit something to the effect of: > If unsigned don't includ

Upcoming Fedora 13 Tasks

Start End Name Thu 25-Mar Thu 08-Apr Test Beta Candidate Wed 07-Apr Wed 07-Apr Fedora 13 Beta Go/No-Go Meeting (20:00 EST) Thu 08-Apr Thu 08-Apr Fedora 13 Beta Release Readiness Meeting Thu 08-Apr Thu 08-Apr Start Stage & Sync Beta to Mirrors Thu 08-Apr Tue 13-Apr Stage & Sy

Re: Unsigned Packages - Yum/Pk

> Yum can only tell if something is signed (and by what key it is signed) > after it has downloaded the package. > Currently we have no easy way to "exclude" packages after the download > phase (the basic problem being we'd need to go back and redo the > transaction, which was a couple of steps

Re: openal-soft .pc file compiling is broken i need help please

On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 13:09 +0200, LinuxDonald wrote: > Am 05.04.2010 03:11, schrieb Braden McDaniel: > > On Sun, 2010-04-04 at 17:18 +0200, LinuxDonald wrote: > > > >> Am 01.04.2010 23:01, schrieb Braden McDaniel: > >> > > [snip] > > > > > >>> It looks like this line in CMakeLists.t

Re: Unsigned Packages - Yum/Pk

On 05/04/10 17:19, John Reiser wrote: >>Yum can only tell if something is signed (and by what key it is signed) >> after it has downloaded the package. >>Currently we have no easy way to "exclude" packages after the download >> phase (the basic problem being we'd need to go back and redo th

F-13 Branched report: 20100405 changes

Compose started at Mon Apr 5 09:15:07 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- edje-0.9.9.050-6.fc12.i686 requires libembryo.so.0 edje-devel-0.9.9.050-6.fc12.i686 requires embryo-devel gnome-web-photo-0.9-4.fc13.i686 requires

Re: i386-class support changed in F-13?

On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 02:48:03PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > Hello, > > I was trying to install i686 variant of F-13 to an Alix board (2D13 with > Geode LX) and got into troubles. The kernel boots fine, but when it > should start initramfs the kernel panics. Everything works well when > using comp

File SVG-TT-Graph-0.14.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by eseyman

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-SVG-TT-Graph: 05d35dd63a0c77f274a0f29217f361e9 SVG-TT-Graph-0.14.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai

Re: i386-class support changed in F-13?

Richard W.M. Jones píše v Po 05. 04. 2010 v 19:31 +0100: > On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 02:48:03PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I was trying to install i686 variant of F-13 to an Alix board (2D13 with > > Geode LX) and got into troubles. The kernel boots fine, but when it > > should star

X vt selection in F-13

So, how is the select of which VT X is to run on supposed to work in F-13? It appears that kdm can get it wrong, my guess is a race between kdm and mingetty startup. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577482 Do gdm specify which vt X is to run on? How? -- Orion Poplawski Techn

Re: New emails not being read

On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 23:20 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote: > When going to a new folder and the first new email, seems evo won't show > the email as read even tho it's clicked on. Have to click on another > email and back to it, or open the email to show as read. > > evolution-2.30.0-1.fc13.x86_64

[389-devel] Please review: Bug 574098 - Console has text field when adding usercertificate attribute; should be Set Value button

Hi, Please review the patch for this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574098 Patch: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=404574&action=edit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=404574&action=diff Thanks! -- Endi S. Dewata -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lis

Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-04-06)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting tomorrow at 19:00UTC (3pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. NOTE: The Meeting Time has CHANGED. See above. = Followups = #347 tor is not compliant with Fedora guidelines #351 Create a policy for updates = N

[Test-Announce] Fedora 13 Beta RC#4 available now!

Greetings, Fedora 13 Beta RC#4 is available for testing. Andre has created the test results page and deltaisos for us. I highlighted the test cases which have critical issues in Beta RC2 and RC3 candidates tests[1]. If you are interested in providing feedback against the Beta release criteria [2

Re: 2010-03-25 Printing test day recap

On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 18:48 +0200, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > The turnout was somewhat disappointing: we only had results from about a > > half dozen testers. If anyone has a particular reason they didn't > > attend, we'd love to hear about

[Test-Announce] Bugzappers Meeting Agenda for 2010-04-06

Event: Fedora Bug Triage Meeting Date: 2010-04-06 Time: 15:00 UTC Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Additions or corrections to the agenda? Reply to this email. = Agenda = * follow ups * impact of new release schedule (tech33) * open floor Thanks to tech33 for our agenda item this w