On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:33:09AM +0800, He Rui wrote:
> Greetings testers,
>
> F13 Beta RC1 has been uploaded for testing. As before, please follow the
> guidance in the below
> links to download the images and execute test cases to make sure they meet
> the beta release criteria[1]:
>
> Inst
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 06:12:32PM +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> I want to ask which is the maximum length of a userid on Fedora Linux.
>
> I think the maximum length of a userid should be 16 but I want to get
> a confiration about this assumetion.
Even old Red Hat Linux supported long account n
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 07:23 +0100, Paul wrote:
> Oddly, Matt's solution of
>
> wget -O - \
> 'https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=rawhide&arch=i686'
>
> does work, but it looks like the problem is a crypto one...
It's also a yum bug that it doesn't give you a sane error message, an
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Paul wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been away from my pc for the last couple of days and have come back
> to find a problem.
>
> When I try to do an update from yum, I'm getting the following error
>
> Error: Cannot retrieve metalink for repository: rawhide. Please verify
I am irritated by the way the KDE SIG and the KDE bugzappers handle
bugs. For most bugs that are reported they demand the reporter to file
an upstream bug report at bugs.kde.org and set the bug to NEEDINFO. If
the reporter doesn't respond, the bug is closed NOTABUG or WONTFIX. But
if the bug has be
On Monday 29 March 2010 13:09:46 Christoph Wickert wrote:
> I am irritated by the way the KDE SIG and the KDE bugzappers handle
> bugs. For most bugs that are reported they demand the reporter to file
> an upstream bug report at bugs.kde.org and set the bug to NEEDINFO. If
> the reporter doesn't re
I had similar issues already and I totally agree with Christoph!
The maintainer should not redirect the bugreporter to the upstream bugreporting
plattform. I already have plenty of accounts on upstream bugzillas because of
exactly this...
-of
Christoph Wickert schrieb:
>I am irritated by the
On Monday 29 March 2010 13:38:52 Oliver Falk wrote:
> I had similar issues already and I totally agree with Christoph!
> The maintainer should not redirect the bugreporter to the upstream
> bugreporting plattform. I already have plenty of accounts on upstream
> bugzillas because of exactly this...
2010/3/29 Oliver Falk :
> I had similar issues already and I totally agree with Christoph!
> The maintainer should not redirect the bugreporter to the upstream
> bugreporting plattform. I already have plenty of accounts on upstream
> bugzillas because of exactly this...
>
I don't see any problem
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:35 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> The problem is - we can't act as man in middle - it's better when original
> reporter is also upstream reporter = direct communication.
Wait -- *any* Fedora developer could say this about any bug. I just
don't think it's true, and it as
On 03/29/2010 01:38 PM, Oliver Falk wrote:
> I had similar issues already and I totally agree with Christoph!
Me too.
Except that I would not want to restrict this complaint to Fedora KDE.
There are many other maintainers who apply a similar strategy and
therefore deserve the same amount of flam
2010/3/29 Michał Piotrowski :
> 2010/3/29 Oliver Falk :
>> I had similar issues already and I totally agree with Christoph!
>> The maintainer should not redirect the bugreporter to the upstream
>> bugreporting plattform. I already have plenty of accounts on upstream
>> bugzillas because of exactl
On Monday 29 March 2010 14:03:51 Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
> 2010/3/29 Michał Piotrowski :
> > 2010/3/29 Oliver Falk :
> >> I had similar issues already and I totally agree with Christoph!
> >> The maintainer should not redirect the bugreporter to the upstream
> >> bugreporting plattform. I already have
2010/3/29 Jaroslav Reznik :
> On Monday 29 March 2010 14:03:51 Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
>> 2010/3/29 Michał Piotrowski :
>> > 2010/3/29 Oliver Falk :
>> >> I had similar issues already and I totally agree with Christoph!
>> >> The maintainer should not redirect the bugreporter to the upstream
>> >> bugr
On Monday 29 March 2010 13:57:54 Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:35 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > The problem is - we can't act as man in middle - it's better when
> > original reporter is also upstream reporter = direct communication.
>
> Wait -- *any* Fedora developer could say t
On 03/29/2010 02:11 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> On Monday 29 March 2010 14:03:51 Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
>> 2010/3/29 Michał Piotrowski:
>>> 2010/3/29 Oliver Falk:
I had similar issues already and I totally agree with Christoph!
The maintainer should not redirect the bugreporter to the upstr
On Monday 29 March 2010 14:20:57 Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 03/29/2010 02:11 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > On Monday 29 March 2010 14:03:51 Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
> >> 2010/3/29 Michał Piotrowski:
> >>> 2010/3/29 Oliver Falk:
> I had similar issues already and I totally agree with Christoph!
> >
On Monday 29 March 2010 14:16:55 Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
> 2010/3/29 Jaroslav Reznik :
> > On Monday 29 March 2010 14:03:51 Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
> >> 2010/3/29 Michał Piotrowski :
> >> > 2010/3/29 Oliver Falk :
> >> >> I had similar issues already and I totally agree with Christoph!
> >> >> The maintain
Hi,
I am trying to reposync updates, but reposync seems to be having troubles:
...
[updates: 2742 of 6885 ] Downloading
kde-l10n-Korean-4.4.1-2.fc12.noarch.rpm
Could not retrieve package kde-l10n-Korean-4.4.1-2.fc12.noarch. Error
was failure: kde-l10n-Korean-4.4.1-2.fc12.noarch.rpm from updat
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 02:20:57PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> As a user, having been hit by a bug, "CLOSED UPSTREAM" is nothing but a
> cheap bold lie packagers use as weak excuse to for not being able to fix
> a bug having hit a user.
>
> In other words: "FIXED UPSTREAM" does not fix anyth
2010/3/29, Michał Piotrowski :
> I don't see any problem here if KDE SIG just declare "we don't fix KDE
> bugs, we just update packages".
wtf? You can not be serious!
It's the duty of every maintainer to accept responsibility for his/her
package(s).
If there is no responsibility granted for package
2010/3/29 Josephine Tannhäuser :
> 2010/3/29, Michał Piotrowski :
>> I don't see any problem here if KDE SIG just declare "we don't fix KDE
>> bugs, we just update packages".
> wtf? You can not be serious!
> It's the duty of every maintainer to accept responsibility for his/her
> package(s).
> If t
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 15:10 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>
> But still bugs are fixed by program developers not Fedora developers.
IMO 'Fedora developers' (really, what you mean here are packagers, I
guess) should strive to become 'program developers' for the packages
they maintain.
Getting
On Monday 29 March 2010 15:13:56 Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 15:10 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> > But still bugs are fixed by program developers not Fedora developers.
>
> IMO 'Fedora developers' (really, what you mean here are packagers, I
> guess) should strive to become
2010/3/29 Till Maas :
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 02:20:57PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
>> As a user, having been hit by a bug, "CLOSED UPSTREAM" is nothing but a
>> cheap bold lie packagers use as weak excuse to for not being able to fix
>> a bug having hit a user.
>>
>> In other words: "FIXED U
On 3/29/2010 7:33, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> I am trying to reposync updates, but reposync seems to be having troubles:
>
> ...
> [updates: 2742 of 6885 ] Downloading
> kde-l10n-Korean-4.4.1-2.fc12.noarch.rpm
> Could not retrieve package kde-l10n-Korean-4.4.1-2.fc12.noarch. Error
> was failure: kde
Start End Name
Thu 25-Mar Thu 01-Apr Test Beta Candidate
Wed 31-Mar Wed 31-Mar Beta Go/No-Go Meeting (20:00 EST)
Thu 01-Apr Thu 01-Apr Start Stage & Sync Beta to Mirrors
Thu 01-Apr Thu 01-Apr Beta Project Wide Release Readiness Meeting
Thu 01-Apr Tue 06-Apr Stage & Sync Beta
On 03/29/2010 04:30 PM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> On 3/29/2010 7:33, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> I am trying to reposync updates, but reposync seems to be having troubles:
>>
>> ...
>> [updates: 2742 of 6885 ] Downloading
>> kde-l10n-Korean-4.4.1-2.fc12.noarch.rpm
>> Could not retrieve package kde-
Hello,
because for the new Qt installation, nas it not needed anymore,
to play sounds I orphaning it.
When somebody will you can take it.
For EL4 and EL5 I will maintain it until EL4/EL5 will be unsupported at
upstreanm.
Current Bugs:
#565181 - The make file for >FC12 must be fixed.
smime.p7s
D
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Paul wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been away from my pc for the last couple of days and have come back
>> to find a problem.
>>
>> When I try to do an update from yum, I'm getting the following error
>>
>> Error
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-STOMP-Client:
0cb3ba1526f50210c7787f2f7c1658f9 Net-STOMP-Client-0.9.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.
Author: stevetraylen
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-STOMP-Client/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv11838
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec sources
Log Message:
New 0.9 upstream.
Index: .cvsignore
===
Author: stevetraylen
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-STOMP-Client/EL-5
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12702/EL-5
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec sources
Log Message:
Up 0.9.
Index: .cvsignore
=
Author: stevetraylen
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-STOMP-Client/F-12
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12702/F-12
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec sources
Log Message:
Up 0.9.
Index: .cvsignore
=
Author: stevetraylen
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-STOMP-Client/F-11
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12702/F-11
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec sources
Log Message:
Up 0.9.
Index: .cvsignore
=
Author: stevetraylen
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-STOMP-Client/EL-4
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12702/EL-4
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec sources
Log Message:
Up 0.9.
Index: .cvsignore
=
Author: stevetraylen
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-STOMP-Client/F-13
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12702/F-13
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec sources
Log Message:
Up 0.9.
Index: .cvsignore
=
Compose started at Mon Mar 29 08:15:07 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
anaconda-14.2-1.fc14.i686 requires fcoe-utils >= 0:1.0.12-2.20100323git
dsniff-2.4-0.8.b1.fc13.i686 requires libnids.so.1.23
emotion-0.1.0.042-5.f
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577880
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-29
12:31:54 EDT ---
perl-Net-STOMP-Client-0.9-1.fc12 has been submitted as an
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 17:31 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> * Somebody at rel-eng failed to do his job ;)
That file exists on the master mirror, so your favorite punching bag
doesn't seem to be the blame this time.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkea
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577880
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-29
12:30:55 EDT ---
perl-Net-STOMP-Client-0.9-1.el5 has been submitted as an u
Yeah. Kick out KDE! Use XFCE! Flamewar! *g*
Just jokin'...
I also agree with "Fine". Pkg maintainers are responsible for their pkgs. And
of course not everybody is able to fix any kind of bug...
Josephine Tannhäuser schrieb:
>2010/3/29, Michał Piotrowski :
>> I don't see any problem here
Compose started at Mon Mar 29 09:15:04 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
gnome-web-photo-0.9-4.fc13.i686 requires gecko-libs = 0:1.9.2.1
hornsey-1.5.2-0.1.fc13.i686 requires libclutter-gst-0.10.so.0
libnodeupdown-backen
Hi,
I'm looking for a way how to correctly have beep program[1] with setuid
binary (I mean, what is correct process for this from maintainer point
of view? Or what should be done except change in spec file). I saw
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Privilege_escalation_policy
however, I have no idea wh
Package perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak in Fedora 13 was orphaned by allisson
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fed
Package perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak in Fedora 12 was orphaned by allisson
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fed
Package perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak in Fedora devel was orphaned by allisson
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.
Package perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak in Fedora 10 was orphaned by allisson
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fed
Package perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak in Fedora 11 was orphaned by allisson
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fed
Package perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak in Fedora 9 was orphaned by allisson
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedo
Package perl-Test-JSON in Fedora devel was orphaned by allisson
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Test-JSON
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.
Package perl-Test-JSON in Fedora 12 was orphaned by allisson
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Test-JSON
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Package perl-Test-JSON in Fedora 10 was orphaned by allisson
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Test-JSON
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Package perl-Test-JSON in Fedora 11 was orphaned by allisson
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Test-JSON
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Package perl-Test-JSON in Fedora 9 was orphaned by allisson
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Test-JSON
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Package perl-Object-Event in Fedora devel was orphaned by allisson
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Object-Event
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedorapr
Package perl-Object-Event in Fedora 13 was orphaned by allisson
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Object-Event
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproje
Package perl-Object-Event in Fedora 12 was orphaned by allisson
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Object-Event
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproje
Package perl-Object-Event in Fedora 11 was orphaned by allisson
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Object-Event
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproje
Package perl-Net-DBus-GLib in Fedora devel was orphaned by allisson
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Net-DBus-GLib
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedora
Package perl-Net-DBus-GLib in Fedora 13 was orphaned by allisson
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Net-DBus-GLib
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedorapro
Package perl-Net-DBus-GLib in Fedora 11 was orphaned by allisson
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Net-DBus-GLib
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedorapro
Package perl-Net-DBus-GLib in Fedora 12 was orphaned by allisson
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Net-DBus-GLib
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedorapro
Package perl-Net-DBus-GLib in Fedora 10 was orphaned by allisson
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Net-DBus-GLib
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedorapro
Package perl-Net-DBus-GLib in Fedora 9 was orphaned by allisson
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Net-DBus-GLib
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproj
Package perl-Object-Event in Fedora 10 was orphaned by allisson
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Object-Event
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproje
Package perl-MooseX-Singleton in Fedora devel was orphaned by allisson
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-MooseX-Singleton
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.
Package perl-MooseX-Singleton in Fedora 13 was orphaned by allisson
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-MooseX-Singleton
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fed
Package perl-MooseX-Singleton in Fedora 10 was orphaned by allisson
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-MooseX-Singleton
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fed
Package perl-MooseX-Singleton in Fedora 12 was orphaned by allisson
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-MooseX-Singleton
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fed
Package perl-MooseX-Singleton in Fedora 9 was orphaned by allisson
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-MooseX-Singleton
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedo
Package perl-MooseX-Singleton in Fedora 11 was orphaned by allisson
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-MooseX-Singleton
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fed
Package perl-Test-JSON in Fedora 13 was orphaned by allisson
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Test-JSON
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Am Montag, den 29.03.2010, 19:47 +0200 schrieb Oliver Falk:
> Yeah. Kick out KDE! Use XFCE! Flamewar! *g*
+1 :D
>
> Just jokin'...
>
> I also agree with "Fine". Pkg maintainers are responsible for their pkgs. And
> of course not everybody is able to fix any kind of bug...
I also agree with Ch
I am orphaning the following packages.
==
amora -- A mobile remote assistant
couchdb -- A document database server, accessible via a RESTful JSON API
eina -- A classic player for a modern era
emesene --
Am Montag, den 29.03.2010, 21:05 +0200 schrieb Thomas Spura:
> Am Montag, den 29.03.2010, 19:47 +0200 schrieb Oliver Falk:
> > I also agree with "Fine". Pkg maintainers are responsible for their pkgs.
> > And of course not everybody is able to fix any kind of bug...
>
> I also agree with Christop
2010/3/29 Allisson Azevedo :
> I am orphaning the following packages.
>
> couchdb -- A document database server, accessible via a RESTful JSON API
I can (co)maintain it. Are there any other volunteers?
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ht
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 19:00UTC (3pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
NOTE: The Meeting Time has CHANGED. See above.
= Followups =
#347 tor is not compliant with Fedora guidelines
#351 Create a policy for updates
#356
Allisson Azevedo wrote:
> I am orphaning the following packages.
>
> ==
> amora -- A mobile remote assistant
>
> couchdb -- A document database server, accessible via a RESTful JSON API
>
> eina -- A classic
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 17:39:08 +0200,
Frank Büttner wrote:
> Hello,
> because for the new Qt installation, nas it not needed anymore,
> to play sounds I orphaning it.
> When somebody will you can take it.
> For EL4 and EL5 I will maintain it until EL4/EL5 will be unsupported at
> upstreanm.
>
Em 29-03-2010 16:40, Jon Ciesla escreveu:
> Allisson Azevedo wrote:
>> I am orphaning the following packages.
I'm took amora and pino.
Comaintainers welcome as always.
Regards,
--
Filipe Rosset
Projeto Fedora Brasil
ros...@projetofedora.org
rosset.fil...@gmail.com
Rio Grande do Sul - Brasil
"Fi
I can take:
- sphinx
- siege
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Jan Klepek píše v Po 29. 03. 2010 v 20:59 +0200:
> I'm looking for a way how to correctly have beep program[1] with setuid
> binary (I mean, what is correct process for this from maintainer point
> of view? Or what should be done except change in spec file). I saw
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/P
I am a gnome user and since had to do a new install yesterday of F13, I
decided to give KDE a try, as I hadn't installed it in few years. Well,
I won't get into why I didn't stay in KDE, but I will tell you what I
liked about the initial desktop look/feel. Actually, backup a tad and
go to the KDM
Till Maas wrote:
> Also it would be nice to provide hardware testing feedback, e.g. for Xorg
> updates to say "Works with nouveau, Geforce XY, using VGA out and XV",
> which then shows that e.g. 3D support, DVI out or multi screen support
> was not tested.
That sounds like a social problem, or at
Mike Chambers wrote:
> (Can KDM be installed with minimal deps and be used for that screen
> instead?)
Yes (depends only on kdelibs).
-- Rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 18:54 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Mike Chambers wrote:
>
> > (Can KDM be installed with minimal deps and be used for that screen
> > instead?)
>
> Yes (depends only on kdelibs).
Hrm, is it called kdm? If so, it wanted 52 deps with it.
--
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY
"
Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 18:54 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Mike Chambers wrote:
>>
>> > (Can KDM be installed with minimal deps and be used for that screen
>> > instead?)
>>
>> Yes (depends only on kdelibs).
>
> Hrm, is it called kdm? If so, it wanted 52 deps with it.
Yes,
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 19:38 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Mike Chambers wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 18:54 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> >> Mike Chambers wrote:
> >>
> >> > (Can KDM be installed with minimal deps and be used for that screen
> >> > instead?)
> >>
> >> Yes (depends only on kdelibs
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 05:31:33PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 03/29/2010 04:30 PM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> > On 3/29/2010 7:33, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> I am trying to reposync updates, but reposync seems to be having troubles:
> >>
> >> ...
> >> [updates: 2742 of 6885 ] Downloading
>
在2010-03-30 03:40:30，"Jon Ciesla" 写道：
>Allisson Azevedo wrote:
>> I am orphaning the following packages.
>>
>> ==
>> amora -- A mobile remote assistant
>>
>> couchdb -- A document database server, acce
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Matt Domsch wrote:
>
> I do wish yum would be more verbose about _which_ mirror it is using,
> which is available as a debug option. That would help folks like me
> look for which mirrors might be out of date. But if a mirror is more
> than 2 days out of date, yum won't tr
On 03/29/2010 07:44 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 17:31 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> * Somebody at rel-eng failed to do his job ;)
>
> That file exists on the master mirror, so your favorite punching bag
> doesn't seem to be the blame this time.
The files in question also exi
On 03/30/2010 03:40 AM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 05:31:33PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 03/29/2010 04:30 PM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
>>> On 3/29/2010 7:33, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I am trying to reposync updates, but reposync seems to be having troubles:
...
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 09:58:08PM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > I do wish yum would be more verbose about _which_ mirror it is using,
> > which is available as a debug option. That would help folks like me
> > look for which mirrors might be out of date.
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Thomas Spura wrote:
> Am Montag, den 29.03.2010, 21:05 +0200 schrieb Thomas Spura:
>> Am Montag, den 29.03.2010, 19:47 +0200 schrieb Oliver Falk:
>> > I also agree with "Fine". Pkg maintainers are responsible for their pkgs.
>> > And of course not everybody is able
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 03/29/2010 07:44 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> My conclusion from this: Either fedora's mirror manager is dysfunctional
> or rel-eng pushed broken packages.
Or someone mirrored during a push
Or your network path has a transparent cache som
Once upon a time, Ralf Corsepius said:
> The files in question also exist in my reposync'ed repository, but they
> are broken:
>
> kdeartwork-4.4.1-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm: rsa sha1 (MD5) PGP MD5 NOT OK
So your reposynced respository is bad. Have you tried removing the
files and resyncing? My copy
On 03/30/2010 05:46 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Ralf Corsepius said:
>> The files in question also exist in my reposync'ed repository, but they
>> are broken:
>>
>> kdeartwork-4.4.1-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm: rsa sha1 (MD5) PGP MD5 NOT OK
>
> So your reposynced respository is bad. Have you
On 03/30/2010 05:40 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 03/29/2010 07:44 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>
>> My conclusion from this: Either fedora's mirror manager is dysfunctional
>> or rel-eng pushed broken packages.
>
> Or someone mirrored d
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
