On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:41:44 -0500 Jon Masters wrote:
> I also suggest /considering/ implementing rolling updates rather than
> pushing everything to stable. By rolling updates, in this case I mean
> implementing a technical means (and this is tricky with mirrors) by
> which not every user will rec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/09/2010 12:12 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> ...
> We need to work on making it easier for users to see that there are
> available testing updates and give feedback on them. This is clearly
> going to take a while
.. but should happen before the
Matthew Garrett píše v Po 08. 03. 2010 v 21:59 +:
> This is the policy that I expect to be discussed during the Fesco
> meeting tomorrow. This is entirely orthogonal to the ongoing discussions
> regarding whether updates in stable releases should be expected to
> provide features or purely
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Sven Lankes wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 09:59:29PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
>> Before being added to updates, the package must receive a net karma of
>> +3 in Bodhi.
>
> [...]
>
>> It is the expectation of Fesco that the majority of updates should
>> ea
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 00:53, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 18:45 -0500, Steven M. Parrish wrote:
>> As a maintainer I have seen several of my packages sit in updates testing for
>> over 2 weeks with no comments and no karma. In fact they sat so long I got
>> nag mail about not pus
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 09:28 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:41:44 -0500 Jon Masters wrote:
> > I also suggest /considering/ implementing rolling updates rather than
> > pushing everything to stable. By rolling updates, in this case I mean
> > implementing a technical means (an
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 09:59:29PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> It is the expectation of Fesco that the majority of updates should
> easily be able to garner the necessary karma in a minimal space of time.
This seems naive to me. My experience is that there are few people
willing to provide
On 03/09/2010 05:45 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 03/09/2010 06:37 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
>> Correct me if I am wrong, but right now the Fedora project knows little
>> to nothing about its user base as a whole from a scientific perspective.
> And why does Fedora need to know about this?
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 16:10:40 -0700, Kevin wrote:
> - Proposed Updates Policy Change - mjg59
So, I'm willing to sacrifice a pawn. If that proposal, in particular the
| Before being added to updates, the package
| must receive a net karma of +3 in Bodhi.
part and/or "a minimum 14 days halt in upd
2010/3/9 Michael Schwendt :
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 16:10:40 -0700, Kevin wrote:
>
>> - Proposed Updates Policy Change - mjg59
>
> So, I'm willing to sacrifice a pawn. If that proposal, in particular the
>
> | Before being added to updates, the package
> | must receive a net karma of +3 in Bodhi.
>
>
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 08:51:06AM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
> 1. One group wants us to aim for mom/pop/grandma/desktop users - the
> apple market or what ubuntu aims for.
>
> 2. one group wants us to aim exclusively for the bleeding edge open
> source developer market.
>
> 3. one group wants us
Event: Fedora Bug Triage Meeting
Date: 2010-03-09
Time: 15:00 UTC
Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Additions or corrections to the agenda? Reply to this email.
= Agenda =
* follow ups from last meeting
* your item here! (let us know before the meeting)
* open floor
Please do come
Author: stevetraylen
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-STOMP-Client/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25752/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec
Log Message:
Import of perl-Net-STOMP-Client.
--- N
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-STOMP-Client:
94b6b61ac64c91be844aa94efe1c9247 Net-STOMP-Client-0.8.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 08:51:06AM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
>> 1. One group wants us to aim for mom/pop/grandma/desktop users - the
>> apple market or what ubuntu aims for.
>>
>> 2. one group wants us to aim exclusively for the bleeding edge open
>> so
Author: stevetraylen
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-STOMP-Client/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31470/F-11
Modified Files:
sources
Added Files:
perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec
Log Message:
Populate branches.
--- NEW FILE perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec ---
Author: stevetraylen
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-STOMP-Client/EL-5
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31470/EL-5
Modified Files:
sources
Added Files:
perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec
Log Message:
Populate branches.
--- NEW FILE perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec ---
Author: stevetraylen
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-STOMP-Client/F-13
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31470/F-13
Modified Files:
sources
Added Files:
perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec
Log Message:
Populate branches.
--- NEW FILE perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563935
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/06/2010 05:21 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> Good news everyone,
>
> you can probably expect to receive more positive bodhi karma for your
> updates in the future (or you already got unexpected much), because
> there is now a script called 'fedora-easy-
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 11:11:30AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 16:10:40 -0700, Kevin wrote:
>
> > - Proposed Updates Policy Change - mjg59
>
> So, I'm willing to sacrifice a pawn. If that proposal, in particular the
>
> | Before being added to updates, the package
> | mu
On Tuesday 09 March 2010 06:05:32 Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Jon Masters wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > I will propose this to FESCo through their normal channels.
> >
> > My proposal is that we create a "Fedora User Survey" and create a link
> > on the fp.o website with a few very simple
On Tuesday 09 March 2010 13:55:53 Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Karel Zak wrote:
> > Always when I see that someone is trying to introduce a new rule I
> > have to ask myself ... why so large project like kernel is able to
> > successfully exist for 20 years without a huge collection of r
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:51, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 09:59:29PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> It is the expectation of Fesco that the majority of updates should
>> easily be able to garner the necessary karma in a minimal space of time.
>
> This seems naive to me. My experi
Sounds pretty sensible.
We should also keep in mind that one size does not fit all. While core
and widely used packages should have a more conservative update path,
some packages could benefit from faster release. karma mechanism +
feedback integration in PK looks like a total win for the latter.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563937
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 08:51 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
>> Here's the camps I see:
>>
>> 1. One group wants us to aim for mom/pop/grandma/desktop users - the
>> apple market or what ubuntu aims for.
>>
>> 2. one group wants us to aim exclusively for the
Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 07:50 -0500 schrieb Stephen Gallagher:
> On 03/06/2010 05:21 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> > [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Easy_Karma
>
>
> Given the obvious utility of this script, can we get it added to the
> fedora-packager package? It doesn't make a lot of se
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 03/08/2010 11:05 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
>> -1
>>
>> It sure looks like a californian referendum process. Let me make this
>> abundantly clear: I have ZERO interest in developing a distro which is
>> driven by mob vote of whomever happens to be o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/08/2010 10:59 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> The ability for maintainers to flag an update directly into the updates
> repository will be disabled. Before being added to updates, the package
> must receive a net karma of +3 in Bodhi.
- -1, I wou
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 08:51 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
> We get the users we aim for.
Not really true. We don't aim at all, and we only get the users that can
bear to stay with us...
> Here's the camps I see:
>
> 1. One group wants us to aim for mom/pop/grandma/desktop users - the
> apple market
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>
> Another question - how many broken things we shipped in release that could be
> fixed by updates? We shipped lot of unfinished, feature incomplete stuff in
> history...
>
> Nobody can't say I'm for shipping broken stuff - for release, updates etc...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563937
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 14:20:20 +0100, Mathieu wrote:
> I maintain some niche packages that almost no one uses/no one would
> provide karma for. But if I'm asked for a bugfix, and I do it, I want
> the people requesting it to tell me that it indeed fixes the issue and
> doesn't break anything else.
Hello Seth,
Tuesday, March 9, 2010, 8:38:44 AM, you wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>> On Tuesday 09 March 2010 14:02:07 Seth Vidal wrote:
> I'm sure with the same logic I can say a lot of things.
> What I said was " I want fewer broken things."
> -sv
Seth,
The problem is
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
>
> Seth,
>
> The problem is that when things do get broken in a stable release, the
> updates that fix the problem often only get released in the next
> release.
>
> When I installed F11, two of my systems ran fine for the install and
> those upda
Hello Seth,
Tuesday, March 9, 2010, 9:37:26 AM, you wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
>> Hello Seth,
>>
>> Tuesday, March 9, 2010, 9:23:00 AM, you wrote:
>>
>>> Your primary server runs fedora? May I ask why?
>>> -sv
>>
>> I have limited time to do system installs and maintena
On Tuesday 09 March 2010 15:33:35 Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 12:23 +0100, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > Ok, but then we're stuck in infinite cycle. Some people want to change
> > update policies/target of Fedora because of users, we don't know who are
> > our user and what they want.
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 12:23 +0100, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> Ok, but then we're stuck in infinite cycle. Some people want to change update
> policies/target of Fedora because of users, we don't know who are our user
> and
> what they want. Now someone wants to know who are our users/what our user
Hello Seth,
Tuesday, March 9, 2010, 9:23:00 AM, you wrote:
> Your primary server runs fedora? May I ask why?
> -sv
I have limited time to do system installs and maintenance. Sticking
with one distribution helps keep that sane. I have a dual boot XP +
Ubuntu machine that I do some play with
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
> Hello Seth,
>
> Tuesday, March 9, 2010, 9:23:00 AM, you wrote:
>
>> Your primary server runs fedora? May I ask why?
>> -sv
>
> I have limited time to do system installs and maintenance. Sticking
> with one distribution helps keep that sane. I have a
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Seth Vidal wrote:
>> Here's the camps I see:
>>
>> 1. One group wants us to aim for mom/pop/grandma/desktop users - the
>> apple market or what ubuntu aims for.
>>
>> 2. one group wants us to aim exclusively for t
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 11:41:44PM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
>
> I believe that this is possibly too limited. Aside from the obvious
> abuse potential (which will always exist no matter what happens) -
> obviously someone could just hate the process and decide to have a
> couple of others sign off
The Fedora 13 "Goddard" Alpha release is available! What's next for the
free operating system that shows off the best new technology of
tomorrow? You can see the future now at:
http://fedoraproject.org/get-prerelease?anF13a
== What is the Alpha release? ==
The Alpha release contains all the feat
On 03/09/2010 02:57 PM, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
> Hello Seth,
>
> Tuesday, March 9, 2010, 9:37:26 AM, you wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
>
>>> Hello Seth,
>>>
>>> Tuesday, March 9, 2010, 9:23:00 AM, you wrote:
>>>
Your primary server runs fedora? May I ask why?
-sv
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Karel Zak wrote:
>
> Always when I see that someone is trying to introduce a new rule I
> have to ask myself ... why so large project like kernel is able to
> successfully exist for 20 years without a huge collection of rules?
the kernel has one rule which ends up working ve
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 10:17:21AM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
> > Aiming at #1 means that every single new student and researcher at the
> > school where I work comes in asking for Ubuntu -- even if one could make a
> > very persuasive case that these users probably fit better into #2 and #3.
> I thi
The Fedora 13 "Goddard" Alpha release is available! What's next for the
free operating system that shows off the best new technology of
tomorrow? You can see the future now at:
http://fedoraproject.org/get-prerelease?anF13a
== What is the Alpha release? ==
The Alpha release contains all the feat
On Tuesday 09 March 2010 14:35:49 Dan Horák wrote:
> Seth Vidal píše v Út 09. 03. 2010 v 08:02 -0500:
> > On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > > Ok, but then we're stuck in infinite cycle. Some people want to change
> > > update policies/target of Fedora because of users, we don't know wh
On Monday, 08 March 2010 at 22:59, Matthew Garrett wrote:
[...]
> Proposal
>
>
> The ability for maintainers to flag an update directly into the updates
> repository will be disabled. Before being added to updates, the package
> must receive a net karma of +3 in Bodhi.
-1 to this. I've
Till Maas said the following on 03/05/2010 04:27 AM Pacific Time:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 10:53:54PM -0500, TK009 wrote:
>
>> I hope everyone is well. With the worst of the “snowpocalypse" behind us
>> (here in the Northern Hemisphere) and the branching of Fedora 13, there
>> is a bit of ‘sprin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563937
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Author: stevetraylen
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-STOMP-Client/EL-4
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31470/EL-4
Modified Files:
sources
Added Files:
perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec
Log Message:
Populate branches.
--- NEW FILE perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec ---
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 March 2010 14:02:07 Seth Vidal wrote:
>> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>>> Ok, but then we're stuck in infinite cycle. Some people want to change
>>> update policies/target of Fedora because of users, we don't know who are
>
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 09:52:28AM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> Matthew Garrett píše v Po 08. 03. 2010 v 21:59 +:
> > This is the policy that I expect to be discussed during the Fesco
> > meeting tomorrow. This is entirely orthogonal to the ongoing discussions
> > regarding whether updates in s
On Mon, 08.03.10 21:59, Matthew Garrett (mj...@srcf.ucam.org) wrote:
> The ability for maintainers to flag an update directly into the updates
> repository will be disabled. Before being added to updates, the package
> must receive a net karma of +3 in Bodhi.
Two questions:
How do you plan to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567120
--- Comment #6 from Jose Pedro Oliveira 2010-03-09 10:23:00
EST ---
Would be possible to have version 1.23 built instead (the
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Set-Scalar/EL-5
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4662
Modified Files:
perl-Set-Scalar.spec sources
Log Message:
sync to current
Index: perl-Set-Scalar.spec
===
On 03/09/2010 03:29 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> The ability for maintainers to flag an update directly into the updates
> repository will be disabled. Before being added to updates, the package
> must receive a net karma of +3 in Bodhi.
>
I don't see how we expect that for all packages to ge
Dne 8.3.2010 22:59, Matthew Garrett napsal(a):
> The ability for maintainers to flag an update directly into the updates
> repository will be disabled. Before being added to updates, the package
> must receive a net karma of +3 in Bodhi.
I usually decrease required karma to +-1, but I have never e
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563935
--- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot 2010-03-09 07:27:53
EST ---
Steven, it's been almost one month already since I filed the bu
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 11:54:29AM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 11:11:30AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 16:10:40 -0700, Kevin wrote:
> >
> > > - Proposed Updates Policy Change - mjg59
> >
> > So, I'm willing to sacrifice a pawn. If that proposal, in p
Today I wanted to give F13 Alpha a test and installed it. The
installation went fine but I do not get a proper screen resolution
setup. The basic setup was done via system-config-display, I only added
a modeline. But it seems to me that the modeline is ignored. Is this a
new behavior because of ker
Compose started at Tue Mar 9 08:15:08 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
blahtexml-0.6-5.fc12.i686 requires libxerces-c.so.28
calibre-0.6.42-1.fc14.i686 requires libMagickCore.so.2
calibre-0.6.42-1.fc14.i686 requires li
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 03:30:37PM +, Terry Barnaby wrote:
> I personally thought the old 12 month RedHat Linux release cycle was about
> right.
RHL was also on a 6 month release cycle.
--
Matt Domsch
Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
--
devel
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 06:00:20PM -0800, Chris Weyl wrote:
> Hmm. So. I have a package, perl-Moose, that has 4,667 tests run at
> build time. It depends on perl-Class-MOP, which has 2,225 tests, and
> it in turn depends on perl, which has 234,776 tests run at build. On
> a future note, we're
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 09:59:29PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> This is the policy that I expect to be discussed during the Fesco
> meeting tomorrow. This is entirely orthogonal to the ongoing discussions
> regarding whether updates in stable releases should be expected to
> provide features
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 15:43 +0100, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
> Today I wanted to give F13 Alpha a test and installed it. The
> installation went fine but I do not get a proper screen resolution
> setup. The basic setup was done via system-config-display, I only added
> a modeline. But it s
On Tuesday 09 March 2010 14:02:07 Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > Ok, but then we're stuck in infinite cycle. Some people want to change
> > update policies/target of Fedora because of users, we don't know who are
> > our user and what they want. Now someone wants
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Karel Zak wrote:
> It's not (only) about Linus. It's about working environment and
> strong focus on technical things.
>
> Please, read:
> http://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/ManagementStyle
>
>> Yes, we don't have Linus here ;-) But usually I like his decisions - mostly
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Set-Scalar:
749349bb42757f46d25593e89444872e Set-Scalar-1.25.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
Seth Vidal píše v Út 09. 03. 2010 v 08:02 -0500:
>
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>
> > Ok, but then we're stuck in infinite cycle. Some people want to change
> > update
> > policies/target of Fedora because of users, we don't know who are our user
> > and
> > what they want. Now
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 10:17:01AM -0500, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> 4. one group who don't really care about distro wars but use Fedora
> because this way they know what will be in RHEL/CentOS, which is what
> they use for "serious work" on their servers.
I actually use RHEL on my servers beca
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 21:59 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> This is the policy that I expect to be discussed during the Fesco
> meeting tomorrow. This is entirely orthogonal to the ongoing discussions
> regarding whether updates in stable releases should be expected to
> provide features or pur
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 02:10:58PM +0100, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 March 2010 13:55:53 Seth Vidal wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Karel Zak wrote:
> > > Always when I see that someone is trying to introduce a new rule I
> > > have to ask myself ... why so large project like kernel is a
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 12:23:42 +0100, Jaroslav wrote:
> Some people want to change update
> policies/target of Fedora because of users,
Not sure this is true.
> we don't know who are our user and
> what they want.
Really? The users I see want "stuff that works". Preferably, they want the
stuff
Author: stevetraylen
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-STOMP-Client/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31470/devel
Modified Files:
perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec
Log Message:
Populate branches.
Index: perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec
=
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> Ok, but then we're stuck in infinite cycle. Some people want to change update
> policies/target of Fedora because of users, we don't know who are our user and
> what they want. Now someone wants to know who are our users/what our users
> really want,
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 03:26:15PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> -1 to this. I've packaged a number of things that I know just one user of.
> I have no idea how many people actually use my packages or how to reach
> them. Therefore it will most likely be impossible for me to get +
On Tuesday 09 March 2010 14:51:06 Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > Another question - how many broken things we shipped in release that
> > could be fixed by updates? We shipped lot of unfinished, feature
> > incomplete stuff in history...
> >
> > Nobody can't say
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Set-Scalar/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7398/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Set-Scalar.spec sources
Log Message:
update to 1.25
Index: .cvsignore
On 03/09/2010 03:57 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 08:51 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
>
>> We get the users we aim for.
>
> Not really true. We don't aim at all, and we only get the users that can
> bear to stay with us...
>
>> Here's the camps I see:
>>
>> 1. One group wants us to
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Set-Scalar/EL-5
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7398/EL-5
Modified Files:
perl-Set-Scalar.spec sources
Log Message:
update to 1.25
Index: perl-Set-Scalar.spec
===
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 11:12:11PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 11:21:45PM +0100, Sven Lankes wrote:
> >
> > If Fesco is aiming at getting rid of all the pesky packagers maintaining low
> > profile packages: You're well on your way.
>
> So, no, that's not the intent and
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 02:20:20PM +0100, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:51, Joe Orton wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 09:59:29PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >> It is the expectation of Fesco that the majority of updates should
> >> easily be able to garner the necessary
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Seth Vidal wrote:
> Here's the camps I see:
>
> 1. One group wants us to aim for mom/pop/grandma/desktop users - the
> apple market or what ubuntu aims for.
>
> 2. one group wants us to aim exclusively for the bleeding edge open
> source developer market.
>
> 3. one
Author: stevetraylen
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-STOMP-Client/F-12
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31470/F-12
Modified Files:
sources
Added Files:
perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec
Log Message:
Populate branches.
--- NEW FILE perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec ---
On Tuesday 09 March 2010 15:57:05 Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 08:51 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
> > We get the users we aim for.
>
> Not really true. We don't aim at all, and we only get the users that can
> bear to stay with us...
>
> > Here's the camps I see:
> >
> > 1. One gro
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 07:45 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 15:43 +0100, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
> > I'm wondering because before F10 was installed, and I even did not need
> > to setup a modeline. Everything was automatically configured by X.org.
>
> If your monit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567120
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-09
11:12:17 EST ---
perl-Set-Scalar-1.25-1.el5 has been submitted as an update
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 03:26:15PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
>
>> -1 to this. I've packaged a number of things that I know just one user of.
>> I have no idea how many people actually use my packages or how to reach
>> them. Ther
- "Jakub Jelinek" wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 06:44:18AM -0500, Michal Nowak wrote:
> > So far when rebuilding Base group: TOTAL: 99 PASS: 84 FAIL: 15
> > See attachment for complete list. Regarding fails, they are being
> > classified by the script so you can easily figure out, where m
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Set-Scalar/F-13
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11905
Modified Files:
perl-Set-Scalar.spec sources
Log Message:
update to 1.25
Index: perl-Set-Scalar.spec
===
On 09/03/10 15:49, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 03:30:37PM +, Terry Barnaby wrote:
>> I personally thought the old 12 month RedHat Linux release cycle was about
>> right.
>
> RHL was also on a 6 month release cycle.
>
Shows how good my memory is :)
Mind you, even then, I only up
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567120
--- Comment #8 from Jose Pedro Oliveira 2010-03-09 11:29:19
EST ---
Spot,
Thanks!
jpo
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzill
- "Richard Hughes" wrote:
> On 8 March 2010 11:44, Michal Nowak wrote:
> > Past months I spent investigating `gold' - the new GNU linker
> > and how it now works with stock Fedora packages.
>
> Using gold, I get:
>
> /usr/bin/ld: --no-add-needed: unknown option
> /usr/bin/ld: use the --he
On 09/03/10 15:26, Seth Vidal wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Seth Vidal wrote:
>>> Here's the camps I see:
>>>
>>> 1. One group wants us to aim for mom/pop/grandma/desktop users - the
>>> apple market or what ubuntu aims for.
>>>
>
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
--
= Weekly KDE Summary
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567120
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2010-03-09
11:40:57 EST ---
perl-Set-Scalar-1.25-1.fc13 has been submitted as an updat
(2010?03?08? 19:54), Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack.
--noriko
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
1 - 100 of 235 matches
Mail list logo
