Re: Heads up! Broken deps in Upgrade from 12 to 13

2010-02-21 Thread Thomas Janssen
2010/2/21 Michael Schwendt : > Just for kicks, the current > >   Upgrade from  12+updates  to  13+updates+testing > > broken deps look like below. While several may be due to dead packages > that have been removed in 13, some are likely due to violated upgrade > paths and bad/missing Obsoletes for

Re: Heads up! Broken deps in Upgrade from 12 to 13

2010-02-21 Thread Paul Howarth
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 04:16:20 + Leigh Scott wrote: > avant-window-navigator doesn't have broken deps, this error occurred > because the F12 package had a higher release version. > Perhaps yum should deal with this better i.e take dist tag into > account Release trumps dist tag by design. This

Re: Package OpenVAS-Server not available

2010-02-21 Thread Xavier Bachelot
On 02/21/2010 01:16 AM, Dirk Gottschalk wrote: > Hello, > > why are the openVAS-Librires (an old Version) available, but > Openvas-Server not available (Fedora 12) ? > > I'm interestet in creating and maintaining these packages with actual > versions, if there is any interest for that. > > Regar

rawhide report: 20100221 changes

2010-02-21 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sun Feb 21 08:15:11 UTC 2010 New package perl-Config-MVP Multivalue-property package-oriented configuration New package perl-Data-Dumper-Concise A convenient way to reproduce a set of Dumper options New package perl-MooseX-Role-WithOverloading Roles which

F-13 Branched report: 20100221 changes

2010-02-21 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Sun Feb 21 09:15:14 UTC 2010 Updated Packages: jd-2.6.5-0.1.svn3370_trunk.fc13 --- * Sat Feb 20 2010 Mamoru Tasaka - rev 3370 mfiler3-3.0.3-1.fc13 * Sat Feb 20 2010 Mamoru Tasaka - 3.0.3-1 - Update to 3.0.3 nntpgrab-0.5.91-

Re: Heads up! Broken deps in Upgrade from 12 to 13

2010-02-21 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:46:14 -0500, Braden wrote: > >Upgrade from 12+updates to 13+updates+testing > > broken deps look like below. While several may be due to dead packages > > that have been removed in 13, some are likely due to violated upgrade > > paths and bad/missing Obsoletes for ol

Re: Heads up! Broken deps in Upgrade from 12 to 13

2010-02-21 Thread Braden McDaniel
On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 19:43 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:46:14 -0500, Braden wrote: > > > >Upgrade from 12+updates to 13+updates+testing > > > > broken deps look like below. While several may be due to dead packages > > > that have been removed in 13, some are l

Re: Bodhi hash collision?

2010-02-21 Thread Luke Macken
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:40:42PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Luke Macken writes: > > A large number of updates currently suffer from duplicate IDs, and I > > need to figure out a clever way to fix it. > > Would it be prudent to not push new updates until you've fixed it? The duplicate update ID i

Re: Heads up! Broken deps in Upgrade from 12 to 13

2010-02-21 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 15:21:22 -0500, Braden wrote: > Then I still don't understand this. openvrml-devel went away between > F12 and F12-updates. Then you've broken F12, too, ... but it doesn't result in broken deps yet because the SONAME deps of the builds haven't changed. Unlike F13. As soon as

Re: Bodhi hash collision?

2010-02-21 Thread Jon Masters
On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 15:36 -0500, Luke Macken wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:40:42PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > Luke Macken writes: > > > A large number of updates currently suffer from duplicate IDs, and I > > > need to figure out a clever way to fix it. > > > > Would it be prudent to not

Re: Package OpenVAS-Server not available

2010-02-21 Thread Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Xavier Bachelot wrote: > On 02/21/2010 01:16 AM, Dirk Gottschalk wrote: >> Hello, >> >> why are the openVAS-Librires (an old Version) available, but >> Openvas-Server not available (Fedora 12) ? >> >> I'm interestet in creating and maintaining these pa

Re: Heads up! Broken deps in Upgrade from 12 to 13

2010-02-21 Thread Braden McDaniel
On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 21:38 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: [snip] > See above. Part of the current multiarch repo compose strategy is to pull > in all -devel packages and their dependency chains. Initially, you've had > openvrml-devel.i686 add openvrml.i686 in the F-12 x86_64 repo. Then you've