Re: urgent help needed with Miro rebuild failure blocking security update

2010-02-20 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Dan Walsh (libsepol maintainer) has fixed that issue (RHBZ #566441) two days ago, it's not yet on updates-testing repository. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-1912?_csrf_token=b13c93d715d4f6fd04f59b03908b54d333d628ec H. Le 20/02/2010 08:32, Alex Lancaster a écrit : > Hi th

How to package .so linker scripts?

2010-02-20 Thread Enrico Scholz
Hi, after replacing .so files with linker scripts, I get | ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libxmlrpc_client.so is not an ELF file - it has the wrong magic bytes at the start. from /sbin/ldconfig calls. File above is | $ ls -l /usr/lib64/libxmlrpc_client.so | -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 108 15. Feb 22:34 /us

Re: How to package .so linker scripts?

2010-02-20 Thread Kevin Kofler
Enrico Scholz wrote: > after replacing .so files with linker scripts, I get > > | ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libxmlrpc_client.so is not an ELF file - it has the > | wrong magic bytes at the start. > > from /sbin/ldconfig calls. File above is > > | $ ls -l /usr/lib64/libxmlrpc_client.so > | -rw-r--r--

Re: How to package .so linker scripts?

2010-02-20 Thread Enrico Scholz
Kevin Kofler writes: >> | ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libxmlrpc_client.so is not an ELF file - it has the >> | wrong magic bytes at the start. > ... > Check the library's DT_SONAME field, it should be libxmlrpc.so.3, not > libxmlrpc.so (which I suspect it is). should be ok: $ readelf -a /usr/lib64/li

rawhide report: 20100220 changes

2010-02-20 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sat Feb 20 08:15:16 UTC 2010 New package dmz-cursor-themes X cursors themes New package dpkg Package maintenance system for Debian Linux New package goddard-backgrounds Goddard desktop backgrounds New package hlint Haskell Source code suggestions

koji being silly?

2010-02-20 Thread Paul
Hi, Trying to build monodevelop on koji and all I'm getting is this [p...@pb3 devel]$ make build Enter passphrase for key '/home/paul/.ssh/id_rsa': Enter passphrase for key '/home/paul/.ssh/id_rsa': /usr/bin/koji build dist-rawhide 'cvs://cvs.fedoraproject.org/cvs/pkgs?rpms/monodevelop/devel#

F-13 Branched report: 20100220 changes

2010-02-20 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Sat Feb 20 09:15:21 UTC 2010 New package kitutuki Shell script language Removed package bazaar Updated Packages: asymptote-1.91-1.fc13 - * Fri Feb 19 2010 Tom "spot" Callaway - 1.91-1 - update to 1.91 clive-2.2.9-1.fc13 -- * Thu Fe

Re: koji being silly?

2010-02-20 Thread Jesse Keating
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 16:27 +, Paul wrote: > My cert is fine as I can commit to cvs. Your cert isn't used with CVS, your ssh key is. Your cert may be expired, and you'll need to get a new one. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature

Re: koji being silly?

2010-02-20 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Saturday 20 February 2010 10:27:47 am Paul wrote: > Hi, > > Trying to build monodevelop on koji and all I'm getting is this > > [p...@pb3 devel]$ make build > Enter passphrase for key '/home/paul/.ssh/id_rsa': > Enter passphrase for key '/home/paul/.ssh/id_rsa': > /usr/bin/koji build dist-ra

Re: koji being silly?

2010-02-20 Thread Mike McGrath
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Saturday 20 February 2010 10:27:47 am Paul wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Trying to build monodevelop on koji and all I'm getting is this > > > > [p...@pb3 devel]$ make build > > Enter passphrase for key '/home/paul/.ssh/id_rsa': > > Enter passphrase for key

Rawhide repo

2010-02-20 Thread Paul
Hi, Just checked why I've not been able to grab the updates from rawhide and it looks like the only fedora.repo files in /etc/yum.repos.d is fedora and fedora-testing. What's happened to the fedora-rawhide.repo files? I know things were forked a few days back, but didn't realise the rawhide.repo

Re: Rawhide repo

2010-02-20 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 08:17:28PM +, Paul wrote: > Hi, > > Just checked why I've not been able to grab the updates from rawhide and > it looks like the only fedora.repo files in /etc/yum.repos.d is fedora > and fedora-testing. What's happened to the fedora-rawhide.repo files? > > I know thin

Re: How to package .so linker scripts?

2010-02-20 Thread Roland McGrath
What ldconfig actually does is fairly stupid. When a file is not something else (i.e. ELF), it checks if the entire contents contain either "GROUP" or "GNU ld script" and barfs if they don't. So the generic advice is to put: /* GNU ld script Explain briefly what this is here for. */ at the

Package OpenVAS-Server not available

2010-02-20 Thread Dirk Gottschalk
Hello, why are the openVAS-Librires (an old Version) available, but Openvas-Server not available (Fedora 12) ? I'm interestet in creating and maintaining these packages with actual versions, if there is any interest for that. Regards, Dirk -- Gottschalk IT + Internet UG (haftungsbeschränkt) Kl

Re: Final (hopefully) privilege escalation policy draft

2010-02-20 Thread Kevin Kofler
Matthew Woehlke wrote: > What happened to 'ask the first time, and at the same time ask to change > the policy to make this action permitted without authentication'? PolicyKit dropped support for that. :-( > IMO that's the right way. Either the user will be nagged *once*, or else > they have said

Heads up! Broken deps in Upgrade from 12 to 13

2010-02-20 Thread Michael Schwendt
Just for kicks, the current Upgrade from 12+updates to 13+updates+testing broken deps look like below. While several may be due to dead packages that have been removed in 13, some are likely due to violated upgrade paths and bad/missing Obsoletes for old subpackages. [...] Summary of brok

Re: Heads up! Broken deps in Upgrade from 12 to 13

2010-02-20 Thread Braden McDaniel
On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 02:15 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Just for kicks, the current > >Upgrade from 12+updates to 13+updates+testing > > broken deps look like below. While several may be due to dead packages > that have been removed in 13, some are likely due to violated upgrade > pa

Re: Heads up! Broken deps in Upgrade from 12 to 13

2010-02-20 Thread Braden McDaniel
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 20:46 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote: > On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 02:15 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > Just for kicks, the current > > > >Upgrade from 12+updates to 13+updates+testing > > > > broken deps look like below. While several may be due to dead packages > > t

Re: Heads up! Broken deps in Upgrade from 12 to 13

2010-02-20 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Schwendt writes: > mysql-cluster-5.1.42-7.fc12.i686 requires mysql = 0:5.1.42-7.fc12 Yeah, so? Those come out of the same SRPM, so it's hardly possible that we are providing one and not the other. I think there's something fishy about your script. regards,

Re: Heads up! Broken deps in Upgrade from 12 to 13

2010-02-20 Thread Leigh Scott
avant-window-navigator doesn't have broken deps, this error occurred because the F12 package had a higher release version. Perhaps yum should deal with this better i.e take dist tag into account On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 02:15 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: >

Re: Heads up! Broken deps in Upgrade from 12 to 13

2010-02-20 Thread Conrad Meyer
On Saturday 20 February 2010 06:03:28 pm Braden McDaniel wrote: > I guess I should properly read the headings... I guess I misunderstood > where this was going from your summary. > > If I understand it correctly, it's telling me that a F12 that hasn't > been updated will have problems being upgrad

Re: Heads up! Broken deps in Upgrade from 12 to 13

2010-02-20 Thread Conrad Meyer
On Saturday 20 February 2010 08:20:17 pm Conrad Meyer wrote: > I think that's everything. Oh, and I forgot something: After making whatever changes need to be made to F-13, tag and rebuild the package. Regards, -- Conrad Meyer -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.

Re: Heads up! Broken deps in Upgrade from 12 to 13

2010-02-20 Thread Braden McDaniel
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 20:20 -0800, Conrad Meyer wrote: > On Saturday 20 February 2010 06:03:28 pm Braden McDaniel wrote: > > I guess I should properly read the headings... I guess I misunderstood > > where this was going from your summary. > > > > If I understand it correctly, it's telling me tha

Re: Heads up! Broken deps in Upgrade from 12 to 13

2010-02-20 Thread Conrad Meyer
On Saturday 20 February 2010 08:34:39 pm Braden McDaniel wrote: > (portions snipped) > > On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 20:20 -0800, Conrad Meyer wrote: > > ... > I'm happy to fix it if I can figure out what's broken. > > ... > That's not it. > > ... > Also not it. > > ... > Nope. > > > I think that's ever

Re:Package OpenVAS-Server not available

2010-02-20 Thread Chen Lei
openvas-libraries is maintained by , maybe you can contact him for more information. http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/openvas-libraries/ 在2010-02-21 08:16:56,"Dirk Gottschalk"  写道: >Hello, > >why are the openVAS-Librires (an old Version) available, but >Openvas-Server not available (