Heads up: bazaar is retired in F13 and devel

Hi, I have started the retiring process for bazaar in the F13 and devel branch. Please update your package if it depends on bazaar! Thanks! Zoltan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [Fwd: I'm leaving packaging on Fedora]

I'll take me-tv, co-maintainers are welcome. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Heads up: bazaar is retired in F13 and devel

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 5:10 AM, Zoltan Kota wrote: > Hi, > > I have started the retiring process for bazaar in the F13 and devel > branch. > Please update your package if it depends on bazaar! > Thanks! > > Zoltan > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedorapro

Re: [Fwd: I'm leaving packaging on Fedora]

looks like packages are not orphaned yet. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Heads up: bazaar is retired in F13 and devel

Adam Miller (maxamill...@fedoraproject.org) said: > > I have started the retiring process for bazaar in the F13 and devel > > branch. > > Please update your package if it depends on bazaar! > > Thanks! > > Just out of curiosity, why is this package being retired? AFAIK, it's been completely repl

Re: Fedora 13 has been branched!!

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 07:36:09AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > We don't really have a coverage list, but most of the people who have > been doing tagging are all in the US time zones, so anything outside of > that is welcome. Ok. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Buildroot_override_SOP is the w

2010-02-19 - Fedora 13 Alpha blocker bug review Recap

We held the third blocker bug review of the Fedora 13 cycle today. A couple of sticky issues, but overall things are looking good. We reviewed all open Alpha blocker bugs. Thanks to all who attended. The summary of the meeting can be found here: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/

Re: Heads up: bazaar is retired in F13 and devel

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Adam Miller (maxamill...@fedoraproject.org) said: >> > I have started the retiring process for bazaar in the F13 and devel >> > branch. >> > Please update your package if it depends on bazaar! >> > Thanks! >> >> Just out of curiosity, why i

Fedora Release Engineering meeting summary for 2010-02-19

Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-02-19/fedora-releng.2010-02-19-18.18.html Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-02-19/fedora-releng.2010-02-19-18.18.txt Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-02-1

Re: Fedora Release Engineering meeting summary for 2010-02-19

On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 12:26 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > Minutes: > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-02-19/fedora-releng.2010-02-19-18.18.html > > Minutes (text): > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-02-19/fedora-releng.2010-02-19-18.18.txt > > Log:

F-13 Branched report: 20100219 changes

Compose started at Fri Feb 19 09:15:13 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- balsa-2.4.6-3.fc13.i686 requires libgmime-2.4.so.2 blahtexml-0.6-5.fc12.i686 requires libxerces-c.so.28 doodle-0.6.7-5.fc12.i686 requires libextra

Re: Bodhi hash collision?

Hi Luke, On 02/18/2010 10:08 PM, Luke Macken wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 03:57:58PM -0500, Josh Kayse wrote: >> On 02/18/2010 02:35 PM, Jonathan Underwood wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I just logged into the bodhi web interface and clicked on "my >>> updates". In the list I see a recent package I pu

Call for Participation - Fedora 13 Talking Points

Talking points are key highlights of the new release. They should be compelling, but they will not necessarily be comprehensive. There are different types of talking points for different types of people: general desktop users/everyone, developers, and sysadmins.  For the Fedora 13 cycle, we will al

Re: Final (hopefully) privilege escalation policy draft

Tim Waugh wrote: > On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 12:10 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: >> That's correct. This is frankly a 'realistic' decision, on the basis >> that the PackageKit maintainer believes updating packages should be >> allowed for a regular user by default and intends to implement this, and >>

Re: Bodhi hash collision?

On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 01:42:29AM +0100, Christian Krause wrote: > Hi Luke, > > On 02/18/2010 10:08 PM, Luke Macken wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 03:57:58PM -0500, Josh Kayse wrote: > >> On 02/18/2010 02:35 PM, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I just logged into the bodhi web

Re: Bodhi hash collision?

Luke Macken writes: > A large number of updates currently suffer from duplicate IDs, and I > need to figure out a clever way to fix it. Would it be prudent to not push new updates until you've fixed it? regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.or

urgent help needed with Miro rebuild failure blocking security update

Hi there, I'm the Miro maintainer and the new xulrunner/firefox API bump causes a broken dep because Miro wasn't able to be rebuilt see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-1727 and: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566883 The proximate cause of this rebuild fail