Le 08/02/2010 23:37, Roland Grunberg a écrit :
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking
+ mysql++ should be fixed. now
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1981564
But I'm asking about -pthread option (which is detect/use for this package).
According to
On 13.02.2010 06:18, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 16:45 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors,
>> pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things
>> that are tagged for the release after they get thr
Le 13/02/2010 01:45, Jesse Keating a écrit :
> As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors,
> pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things
> that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We
> don't yet have a clever name for this co
On 13/02/10 05:18, Adam Williamson wrote:
--snipped--
>> Want to help us come up with a term we could use to reference this tree?
>> Email away!
>
> Why not just call it 13 now, and 14 next time, and so on? It doesn't
> really need to have its own name that's always the same...
+2
Easier tell the
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I'll take a quick look over the weekend. We probably want to wait until
> the branch next week anyway. I have been meaning to get back to
> squashfs-tools in any case, as this gives me a way forward. If it looks
> like I can figure it out, I plan on submitting a package for
John Reiser wrote:
> The previous editions lzma442, 443, 449, 457, 458, 459,
> all required *different* adaptations by upx.
> So a separate Fedora source package would have been of little value,
> except possibly as an indicator of the need for a -libs package.
> But during that time, creating a -l
Jesse Keating wrote:
> As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors,
> pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things
> that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We
> don't yet have a clever name for this concept yet, and we've jus
On 02/12/2010 10:45 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> I'd like to propose moving comps to fedorahosted git.
> Why? Because CVS is a pain.
>
> I can work on fixing the automated releng tasks that use comps.
>
> What I'd like to know is if doing this at some point over the
> next few weeks (say, post-Al
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 10:57:35 +0100,
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > I'll take a quick look over the weekend. We probably want to wait until
> > the branch next week anyway. I have been meaning to get back to
> > squashfs-tools in any case, as this gives me a way forward. If
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 10:57:35 +0100,
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > I'll take a quick look over the weekend. We probably want to wait until
> > the branch next week anyway. I have been meaning to get back to
> > squashfs-tools in any case, as this gives me a way forward. If
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> I'd like to propose moving comps to fedorahosted git.
> Why? Because CVS is a pain.
>
> I can work on fixing the automated releng tasks that use comps.
>
> What I'd like to know is if doing this at some point over the
> next few weeks (say
Hi!
Using the KDE version of fedora 12 and notice that the kplayer doesnt play mp3s
via samba/networkshares. It plays for some seconds and just crash!
Anyone know what to do to fix it!?
__
Bruker du Yahoo!?
Lei av spam? Yahoo! Mail har den beste
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 16:45 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors,
> pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things
> that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We
> don't yet have a clever name
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 04:45:06PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>I'd like to propose moving comps to fedorahosted git.
>Why? Because CVS is a pain.
>
>I can work on fixing the automated releng tasks that use comps.
>
>What I'd like to know is if doing this at some point over the
>next few weeks (s
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 07:36 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
>
> rawhide - packages for rawhide dir
> testing - packages for current development release going to testing
> stable - packages for current development release going to main dir
> release - packages for current officially released already g
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors,
> pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things
> that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We
> don't yet have a clever name fo
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 07:11 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 07:36 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> >
> > rawhide - packages for rawhide dir
> > testing - packages for current development release going to testing
> > stable - packages for current development release going to main
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 09:25 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> staging - devel release for main dir
We use the term staging when we have are putting things on the master
mirror for our other mirrors to pick up (:
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 21:18 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Why not just call it 13 now, and 14 next time, and so on? It doesn't
> really need to have its own name that's always the same...
Mostly because it becomes awkward to talk about things in "13" before 13
is released, and when we're trying
On 13/02/10 00:45, Jesse Keating wrote:
> As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors,
> pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things
> that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We
> don't yet have a clever name for this concept
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:48:07AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> Why not just call it 13 now, and 14 next time, and so on? It doesn't
>> really need to have its own name that's always the same...
> Mostly because it becomes awkward to talk about things in "13" before 13
> is released,
In my w
On 02/13/2010 10:48 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 21:18 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Why not just call it 13 now, and 14 next time, and so on? It doesn't
>> really need to have its own name that's always the same...
>
How about call it 13pre ... keep it simple and what it
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 06:29:33PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 17:07 -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > An interesting note here is that target audience is of no use in deciding
> > this. KDE and GNOME aim for the same target audiences but have different
> > ideas of how to
Le 13/02/2010 16:50, Matt Domsch a écrit :
> trasher: gcompris,homebank,tuxtype2
>
gcompris and homebank are already fixed and has been rebuilt. tuxtype2
will be soon, I'm working on it.
Regards,
Johan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 07:12:24PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Mike McGrath wrote:
> > Spins didn't help, reinstalling did.
>
> No. His problem was with switching desktop environment. It was solved by
> reinstalling with the spin for the target environment, getting the exact
> package selection
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:50:29 -0600,
Matt Domsch wrote:
>
> Of those expected to have worked...
> Without a bug filed: 659
> --
> glest-3.2.2-2.fc12 (build/make) bruno,bruno
I believe I fixed glest on 2010-02-11.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproje
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 08:43:45PM -0600, inode0 wrote:
> > http://www.linux.com/learn/docs/ldp/282996-choosing-the-best-linux-distributions-for-you
> >
> > I particularly like this:
> >
> > "Ubuntu edges out its closest contenders, Fedora and openSUSE, because its
> > development team is constant
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:50:29AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> gpscorrelate-1.6.0-4.fc13 (build/make) till
fixed in release 6 by using g++ for linking.
Regards
Till
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Compose started at Sat Feb 13 08:15:06 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
balsa-2.4.6-3.fc13.i686 requires libgmime-2.4.so.2
beagle-0.3.9-15.fc12.i686 requires mono(gmime-sharp) = 0:2.4.0.0
beagle-evolution-0.3.9-15.fc12
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 17:00 +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> kernel-2.6.33-0.44.rc8.git0.fc13
>
> * Fri Feb 12 2010 Chuck Ebbert 2.6.33-0.44.rc8
> - 2.6.33-rc8
>
> * Fri Feb 12 2010 Chuck Ebbert
> 2.6.33-0.43.rc7.git6
> - 2.6.33-rc7-git6
>
> * Thu Feb 11 2010 Chuc
Mike,
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 17:00 +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> > kernel-2.6.33-0.44.rc8.git0.fc13
> >
> > * Fri Feb 12 2010 Chuck Ebbert 2.6.33-0.44.rc8
> > - 2.6.33-rc8
> >
> > * Fri Feb 12 2010 Chuck Ebbert
> > 2.6.33-0.43.rc7.git6
> > - 2.6.33-rc7-git6
> >
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:27:59 -0800,
darrell pfeifer wrote:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562514
>
> You may have to edit you grub.conf. Look for missing lines compared to
> working stanzas.
That might not be the problem here. I am getting the initrd lines added
now when
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:50:29AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
> using rawhide from 2010-02-10
>
> This run includes the new default linker feature --no-add-needed.
> This is responsible for 446 failures noted below. See
> http://fedoraproject.
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 16:52:55 +0100,
Sven Lankes wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:48:07AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
>
> >> Why not just call it 13 now, and 14 next time, and so on? It doesn't
> >> really need to have its own name that's always the same...
>
> > Mostly because it beco
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:50:29 -0600, Matt wrote:
> sylpheed-3.0.0-3.0.beta7.fc13
> (missing_DSO_to_linker__http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking)
> itamarjp,cwickert,mschwendt
How is package ownership determined? I have nothing to do anymore with
Sylpheed for F-13 or
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 11:07 -0500, Mail Lists wrote:
> How about call it 13pre ... keep it simple and what it is - no need
> for
> contortions.
"Pre" or "Prerelease" was the name we used to use for Beta, so that's
not saving any confusion there :/
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a featu
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 16:03 +, Frank Murphy wrote:
> CuredHide
Actually, I kind of like where this is going. Rawhide -> Curing ->
Stable
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message par
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 11:35:53AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:27:59 -0800,
> darrell pfeifer wrote:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562514
> >
> > You may have to edit you grub.conf. Look for missing lines compared to
> > working stanzas.
>
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:28:34PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:50:29 -0600, Matt wrote:
>
> > sylpheed-3.0.0-3.0.beta7.fc13
> > (missing_DSO_to_linker__http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking)
> > itamarjp,cwickert,mschwendt
>
> How is packa
At the last fesco meeting we talked about the ramifications of allowing
any person in the packager grop to commit to packages and decided that
rather than having more accounts and acls on to manage this, that it was
desirable to change the responsibilities of sponsors and maintainers.
The goal is
Hey all,
I'm orphaning the following packages:
SDL_image
SDL_mixer
SDL_net
SDL_ttf
freeciv
fyre
ggz-gtk-client
gossip
swfdec
swddec-gnome
twitux
Thanks,
/B
--
Brian Pepple
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CB
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 10:57:35 +0100,
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > I'll take a quick look over the weekend. We probably want to wait until
> > the branch next week anyway. I have been meaning to get back to
> > squashfs-tools in any case, as this gives me a way forward. If
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:50:29AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
>> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
>> using rawhide from 2010-02-10
>>
>> This run includes the new default linker feature --no-add-needed.
>> This is responsible
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_sponsor_responsibilities%28draft%29
It says "package sponsor" in the URL, in the heading and in the second
paragraph. I think it should be "packager sponsor" as the sponsor sponsors a
packager, not a package.
Björn Persson
signat
2010/2/13 Tomasz Torcz
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 11:35:53AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:27:59 -0800,
> > darrell pfeifer wrote:
> > >
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562514
> > >
> > > You may have to edit you grub.conf. Look for missing lines
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:10:02 -0800,
darrell pfeifer wrote:
>
> A version of rsyslog was causing the boot to hang. Moving it out of init.d
> for a while fixed it until a new version came along.
Using chkconfig to turn it off is the more standard way to not run a service.
--
devel mailing l
Hi,
Le samedi 13 février 2010 20:34:16, Brian Pepple a écrit :
> Hey all,
>
> I'm orphaning the following packages:
I think it should be nice, when a Fedora packager say he orphaned some
packages, he tells why he orphans its:
- no time to package
- no use it any more
- lack of communication wit
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Frank Büttner wrote:
>> I have done some like at my first package, and then to my was spoken,
>> that I use local mock and not the infrastructure. But after some updates
>> of mock, mock it now dead. The no response from them maintainer.
>
> Do
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 13:34:13 -0600,
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> It seems Lougher added a wrapper for xz about a week ago. I haven't tried it
> out yet, but I think that will likely make it significantly easier for me
> to get 4.1 into rawhide. I won't do this before the alpha, but it might
>
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 19:44 +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 11:35:53AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:27:59 -0800,
> > darrell pfeifer wrote:
> > >
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562514
> > >
> > > You may have to edit you g
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 02:53:20PM -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:50:29AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> >> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
> >> using rawhide from 2010-02-10
> >>
> >> This run incl
On 02/13/2010 01:34 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 11:07 -0500, Mail Lists wrote:
> "Pre" or "Prerelease" was the name we used to use for Beta, so that's
> not saving any confusion there :/
>
Ok - how about 13-dev ... or 13-frontier .. or 13-alpha .. or even
13-not-yet-
It is hard to do testing for spins when there is also some broken dependency
in rawhide. (The latest last minute breakage being gmime.) Doing soname
bumps right before the alpha freeze (I think under the new development rules
the updates would be blocked for beta and beyond) results in fire drills
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors,
> pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things
> that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We
> don't yet have a clever name f
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
> using rawhide from 2010-02-10
>
> This run includes the new default linker feature --no-add-needed.
> This is responsible for 446 failures noted below. See
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 07:11 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 07:36 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> >
> > rawhide - packages for rawhide dir
> > testing - packages for current development release going to testing
> > stable - packages for current development release going to main
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:36:00 -0800
Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 16:03 +, Frank Murphy wrote:
> > CuredHide
>
> Actually, I kind of like where this is going. Rawhide -> Curing ->
> Stable
>
braising ... what a meal will it be ...
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 02:06:06PM -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:28:34PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:50:29 -0600, Matt wrote:
> >
> > > sylpheed-3.0.0-3.0.beta7.fc13
> > > (missing_DSO_to_linker__http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Cha
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:04:33 -0600, Matt wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 02:06:06PM -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:28:34PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:50:29 -0600, Matt wrote:
> > >
> > > > sylpheed-3.0.0-3.0.beta7.fc13
> > > > (miss
On Sat 13 February 2010 4:01:52 am Frode Nicolaisen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Using the KDE version of fedora 12 and notice that the kplayer doesnt play
> mp3s via samba/networkshares. It plays for some seconds and just crash!
>
> Anyone know what to do to fix it!?
Please ask this on the proper list for
Krzesimir Nowak wrote:
> Maybe [unifdef] was retired or orphaned because unifdef was superseded by
> sunifdef (which is packaged in fedora), which is now superseded by coan
> [1] (which is not yet packaged in fedora)?
>
> Krzesimir
>
> [1] http://coan2.sourceforge.net/
>
OK, I've submitted a coa
Adam Williamson wrote:
> The bug lifecycle documentation is here:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow
>
> it's linked extensively from the Bugzilla HOWTO, the QA Wiki section,
> and also if you get to [...]
>
Great, thanks! Now I feel really dumb for not having found
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 02:50:35AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:04:33 -0600, Matt wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 02:06:06PM -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:28:34PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:50:29 -0
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:03:37PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_sponsor_responsibilities%28draft%29
>
> It says "package sponsor" in the URL, in the heading and in the second
> paragraph. I think it should be "packager sponsor" as
64 matches
Mail list logo
