On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 08:12:05AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > You might want to look at smock, which is the tool (wrapper around
> > 'mock') that we initially used to build the mingw tree. One nice
> > feature is that it sorts out dependencies and can build for mult
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I'm not sure it'd work for the main Fedora buildsystem, but it seems
> good for personal repos (though I haven't really used it myself).
In my experience, it's only good for building opensuse packages. The
problem I had with building Fedora
I'm seeing very strange problems in Rawhide at the moment where a
guest kernel (running under qemu) gets stacks of block device errors.
These occur under both IDE and virtio. The block device is backed
with a plain file on the host, so obviously no real error should be
occurring.
It's confusing
After more than 7 months John T. Guthrie III is now officially AWOL, see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514882 and my previous mail
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-January/130011.html
John owned 18 packages:
* checkdns -- A Domain Name Server analysis and re
On 08/02/10 11:03, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> After more than 7 months John T. Guthrie III is now officially AWOL, see
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514882 and my previous mail
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-January/130011.html
>
> John owned 18 packages:
...
2010/2/8 Christoph Wickert :
> * edje -- A graphical layout and animation library
> * eet -- Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and
> compression
> * epeg -- Immensely fast JPEG thumbnailer
> * epsilon -- Small, display independent, and quick thumbnailing
I've
Am Montag, den 08.02.2010, 12:25 +0100 schrieb Thomas Janssen:
> 2010/2/8 Christoph Wickert :
> > * edje -- A graphical layout and animation library
> > * eet -- Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and
> > compression
> > * epeg -- Immensely fast JPEG thumbnailer
> >
2010/2/8 Christoph Wickert :
> Am Montag, den 08.02.2010, 12:25 +0100 schrieb Thomas Janssen:
>> 2010/2/8 Christoph Wickert :
>> > * edje -- A graphical layout and animation library
>> > * eet -- Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and
>> > compression
>> > * epeg --
2010/2/8 Christoph Wickert :
> * e_dbus -- Wrappers around dbus for EFL based applications
> * ecore -- Event/X abstraction layer
> * edje -- A graphical layout and animation library
> * eet -- Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and
> compression
> * efreet
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 05:04:01PM -0600, Sir Gallantmon wrote:
>Is KoPeR ever going to become available? Or is it an idea that is DOA?
It might become available if people actually tried to work on it. Nobody
has so far.
josh
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fed
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> After more than 7 months John T. Guthrie III is now officially AWOL, see
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514882 and my previous mail
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-January/130011.html
>
> John owned 18 packages:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 05:03:51PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Unblocked orphan perl-MooseX-Traits-Attribute-CascadeClear
This package is only orphaned in devel and the perl-sig is watching it,
so maybe it should be retired instead of orphaned.
Regards
Till
pgpRU13h5W5iz.pgp
Description: PGP
Eric Springer wrote:
> In my experience, it's only good for building opensuse packages. The
> problem I had with building Fedora packages is that it builds against
> Fedora at release, rather than against updates (and in my case
> wouldn't even run on an updated system). I asked around on IRC and
>
> John owned 18 packages:
>
> * checkdns -- A Domain Name Server analysis and reporting tool
I'll take this one.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
perl-Padre has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Padre-0.50-3.fc13.noarch requires perl(Win32::API)
On i386:
perl-Padre-0.50-3.fc13.noarch requires perl(Win32::API)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedorapro
Compose started at Mon Feb 8 08:15:08 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
PySolFC-cardsets-1.1-5.2.noarch requires PySolFC = 0:1.1
PySolFC-music-4.40-5.noarch requires PySolFC = 0:1.1
blahtexml-0.6-5.fc12.i686 requires l
2010/2/8 Rawhide Report :
> Compose started at Mon Feb 8 08:15:08 UTC 2010
>
> Broken deps for i386
> --
A list of packages that grows slowly.
> Broken deps for x86_64
> --
Same here,
Start End Name
Tue 09-Feb Tue 09-Feb Feature Freeze (Testable|Complete)
Tue 09-Feb Tue 09-Feb Branch Fedora 13 from Rawhide
Tue 09-Feb Tue 09-Feb Orphan Rawhide Packages
Tue 09-Feb Tue 09-Feb Spins Freeze
Wed 10-Feb Thu 11-Feb Create Alpha Test Compose (TC)
Thu 11-Feb Wed 1
On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 16:52 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> As I said, I don't understand much about them. i.e., I don't know what
> they're used for. i.e., flippant answers aren't terribly helpful. =) I
> am terribly sorry for only having shown up within the last decade or so,
> I fully appreciat
On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 04:28 -0300, Mario Chacon wrote:
> I am trying to get the XDG_SESSION_COOKIE value on SSH connection, but
> I get an empty value, Why do I get empty value? Is it an authorization
> issue?
This isn't really a Fedora issue, but.
You don't have an XDG session cookie when ssh'i
On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 22:27 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Normally automation and lack of duplication is regarded as a good
> thing.
>
> Package X and mingw32-X are related. The description of mingw32-X
> could be something like:
>
> "This package is the library X, cross-compiled for 32
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 12:03 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> * dxpc -- A Differential X Protocol Compressor
Yoink.
- ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> - it actually does work, but it's bug detection/analyse is too general for
> some apps, this is something we know about and it's not in our powers to fix
> (it's not even considered a bug). This is actually the reason why is ABRT
> extendible
On 02/08/2010 05:05 PM, Jerry James wrote:
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
- it actually does work, but it's bug detection/analyse is too general for
some apps, this is something we know about and it's not in our powers to fix
(it's not even considered a bug). This is actu
I have a conflict this morning and wish to move the meeting to 2200 UTC
(2pm US pacific, 5 pm US eastern). This may be a permanent move, to be
decided at the meeting.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Description: This is a dig
Michael Schwendt writes:
>> I believe ABRT shouldn't file a bug report unless it is filled in
>> properly.
>
> Yeah, some of us have pointed out that before.
> I'm happy about every detailed backtrace I get, but I would be even more
> happy if users contributed a tiny bit more and added comments
On 02/08/2010 05:36 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
Michael Schwendt writes:
I believe ABRT shouldn't file a bug report unless it is filled in
properly.
Yeah, some of us have pointed out that before.
I'm happy about every detailed backtrace I get, but I would be even more
happy if users contrib
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 02:19:41PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> fusecompress-2.6-3.fc12.i686 requires libboost_serialization-mt.so.5
> fusecompress-2.6-3.fc12.i686 requires libboost_system-mt.so.5
> fusecompress-2.6-3.fc12.i686 requires libboost_program_options-mt.so.5
> f
the kde-sig is beginning work to prepare qt-4.6/kde-4.4 updates, which
will be landing in f11 and f12 koji buildroots shortly.
Maintainers of qt/kde packages, please be aware of this if doing builds
yourself. If you have any concerns or questions, please drop by
#fedora-kde on freenode/irc (or
With a burst of testing last week, we confirmed that our infrastructure
should handle No Frozen Rawhide
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/No_Frozen_Rawhide_Proposal . Feature
freeze is tomorrow, which is when we'd branch our source control, and
when we'd enact no frozen rawhide. The timing is a bit t
On 02/08/2010 02:22 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 07.02.2010, 22:26 +0100 schrieb Karel Klic:
>> I
>> placed the list of found bugs to the Fedora wiki [2]. IMHO only bugs
>> with 2 comments should be closed, because 2 comments mean that the
>> package maintainer did not touch the b
Jiri Moskovcak writes:
> Such log would be nice, but it might take some time (even days) before
> the app crashes again and I can imagine that could generate quite a
> large log :-/ Maybe if it would store just last few syscalls...
Sure, some circular logging, the last few thousand syscalls, no
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 15:40:48 +0100,
Thomas Janssen wrote:
>
> Same here, a slowly growing list of packages.
>
> What's up with the maintainers of the packages? MIA? Most of the
> packages in this broken-list are broken since some time.
glest got broke by the xerces update and doesn't clea
Hi,
here is another update of packages that are afaik going to be removed
from F13 tomorrow. I started to collect some end user feedback and until
now for these packages interest has been shown:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/muine
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packag
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Eric Springer wrote:
>> In my experience, it's only good for building opensuse packages. The
>> problem I had with building Fedora packages is that it builds against
>> Fedora at release, rather than against updates (and in my case
>> wouldn't
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 10:36 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> You might like to install additional packages before actually running
> the rpmbuild -bs, but rpm has no way of expressing this kind of
> "SourceBuildRequires".
By default, rpmbuild -bs fails if BuildRequires aren't present. This
suggests t
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 21:00 +0100, Iain Arnell wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Eric Springer wrote:
> >> In my experience, it's only good for building opensuse packages. The
> >> problem I had with building Fedora packages is that it builds against
> >> Fedora at r
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 12:54 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 10:36 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> > You might like to install additional packages before actually running
> > the rpmbuild -bs, but rpm has no way of expressing this kind of
> > "SourceBuildRequires".
>
> By defa
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561383
Daniel Walsh changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 11:30 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 09:07:56 -0800,
> Jesse Keating wrote:
> >
> > Even though we've been talking about No Frozen Rawhide for quite a
> > while, this will indeed surprise some people, so we will be trying to be
> > extra verbose in
On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:54:56 -0800, Adam wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 10:36 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> > You might like to install additional packages before actually running
> > the rpmbuild -bs, but rpm has no way of expressing this kind of
> > "SourceBuildRequires".
>
> By default, rpmb
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 02:19:41PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> geglmm-0.1.0-2.fc12.i686 requires libbabl-0.0.so.0
> geglmm-0.1.0-2.fc12.x86_64 requires libbabl-0.0.so.0()(64bit)
I have just rebuilt these, so it should hopefully be fixed in the next
push.
http://koji.fedoraproject
On 02/08/2010 04:07 PM, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> Think networked drives. Is the users home dir mounted on Linux, Solaris,
> Mac, or maybe a P: drive on Windows?
Well, having also been there, I think that sort of environment involves
customization beyond that provided by the distribution. Or, to put
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-Google-AuthSub:
edd1363bd9db1e96d2cd2d4893d62537 Net-Google-AuthSub-0.5.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproj
Author: andriy
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Net-Google-AuthSub/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31050/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log perl-Net-Google-AuthSub.spec
Log Message:
Accepted in #478683
--- NEW FILE impor
On 8 February 2010 14:40, Thomas Janssen wrote:
> 2010/2/8 Rawhide Report :
>> Compose started at Mon Feb 8 08:15:08 UTC 2010
>>
>> Broken deps for i386
>> --
>
> A list of packages that grows slowly.
>
>> Broken deps for x86_64
>> -
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Well, yes, of course. Also, our non-existent system would have free
> ponies for everyone.
The OBS source code has been released under a Free Software license, so in
principle we should be able to just set it up. Of course, in practice we'd
have to come up with the infra
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 09:07 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> /pub/fedora/linux/development/13/ will become the new path of the
> branched Fedora 13 content. This is where builds from the F-13/ branch
> in CVS will go, after they pass through bodhi as "stable".
So let's take above directory layout
This is just an update to let maintainers know that the changes to
LD outlined here :
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking
will be in fedora rawhide pretty soon.
The details behind what this feature will do, along with how to
get failing packages to build can be fou
Till Maas wrote:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/showimg
The big problem with this one is that it's dead upstream (since 2006!) and
stuck at KDE 3 (which also implies that its kipi-plugins support no longer
works because we ship only the KDE 4 kipi-plugins these days, as al
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 23:27 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Well, yes, of course. Also, our non-existent system would have free
> > ponies for everyone.
>
> The OBS source code has been released under a Free Software license, so in
> principle we should be able to just set
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 20:00UTC (3pm EST) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Followups:
#314 Wordpress bundles libraries
New Business:
#336 Fedora Packaging Committee items for ratification (2009-02-03)
* SRPM Buildtime ma
Roland Grunberg wrote:
> This is just an update to let maintainers know that the changes to
> LD outlined here :
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking
>
> will be in fedora rawhide pretty soon.
As a result, you'll be causing dozens of FTBFS bugs just before the f
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 23:27 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> (I think
> this is the main reason why the KoPeR proposal went nowhere.)
KoPeR proposal was approved pending more fine tuned implementation
details. It hasn't gone any further because A) I've lacked the time to
work on it, since I've been
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Right, I was actually wondering about that the other day. How do Novell
> deal with it? Surely even they don't have a patent grant for every
> patent in the world that extends to anything anyone might choose to run
> through OBS...
According to traceroute, build.opensuse.o
Jesse Keating wrote:
> The major hurdle of having koji make use of repos of packages external
> to it has been cleared though, that work went into koji recently.
I can verify this works. Today I successfully built a custom RPM that is
completely proprietary software using Koji installed on a loca
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 11:35:35PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Till Maas wrote:
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/showimg
>
> The big problem with this one is that it's dead upstream (since 2006!) and
> stuck at KDE 3 (which also implies that its kipi-plugins support no lon
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 16:33 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 09:07 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
>
>
> > /pub/fedora/linux/development/13/ will become the new path of the
> > branched Fedora 13 content. This is where builds from the F-13/ branch
> > in CVS will go, after they p
I orphaned gnome-applet-netspeed a few days ago due to bugs being
reported and dead upstream. I did not have the skills necessary to fix
this myself. The initial plan was to retire the package, but since Erik
van Pienbroek said he'll have a look, I decided to orphan the package
instead.
All in all,
Till Maas wrote:
> This sounds like it should have been retired instead of only orphaned.
> Do you happen to know, why it wasn't retired?
Because the Fedora maintainer for the package was AWOL and didn't bother
retiring it. It will be retired now if nobody picks it up.
Kevin Kofler
--
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:39:07 +0100, Julian wrote:
> I orphaned gnome-applet-netspeed a few days ago due to bugs being
> reported and dead upstream. I did not have the skills necessary to fix
> this myself. The initial plan was to retire the package, but since Erik
> van Pienbroek said he'll have a
On 8.2.2010 23:37, Roland Grunberg wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DSOLinkBugs
281 packages? Wov! (That's after the most often occurring problems have
been already resolved, am I right?)
+ let's say 300 "regular" FTBFS bugs -- the F13 mass rebuild will be
really great...
>
> Thank-Yo
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 12:43:31AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Till Maas wrote:
> > This sounds like it should have been retired instead of only orphaned.
> > Do you happen to know, why it wasn't retired?
>
> Because the Fedora maintainer for the package was AWOL and didn't bother
> retiring it.
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 12:43:31AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Till Maas wrote:
> > This sounds like it should have been retired instead of only orphaned.
> > Do you happen to know, why it wasn't retired?
>
> Because the Fedora maintainer for the package was AWOL and didn't bother
> retiring it.
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-02-08/fedora-releng.2010-02-08-22.16.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-02-08/fedora-releng.2010-02-08-22.16.txt
Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-02-0
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 17:37 -0500, Roland Grunberg wrote:
> This is just an update to let maintainers know that the changes to
> LD outlined here :
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking
>
> will be in fedora rawhide pretty soon.
Worth clarifying here: Rawhide or
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 23:54 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Right, I was actually wondering about that the other day. How do Novell
> > deal with it? Surely even they don't have a patent grant for every
> > patent in the world that extends to anything anyone might choose to
> Worth clarifying here: Rawhide or (and?) F13?
They are still the same thing, so both. gcc-4.4.3-5.fc13 is there right now.
Thanks,
Roland
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 18:47 -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Worth clarifying here: Rawhide or (and?) F13?
>
> They are still the same thing, so both.
They will only be so for a fairly short time, and you gave no specific
time frame for landing the change (only 'pretty soon'), so it was not
entir
On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 14:16 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> because I guess they would just sit there until bugzapping period.
There's no 'bugzapping period', exactly. BugZappers work all the time,
but only on a small subset of all Fedora packages, we simply do not have
the manpower to cover all
On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 22:26 +0100, Karel Klic wrote:
> So I'd like to close over 600 bugs in Bugzilla using scripts. Is there
> some Fedora policy regulating this?
It would be best to contact the maintainer of RH Bugzilla, Dave
Lawrence; he'll be able to advise you how to proceed.
--
Adam Willi
71 matches
Mail list logo
