I have orphaned ldtp and pida. However there is something wrong wiwht
glade3. Pressing the "release ownership" button is not orphaning it.
Any ideas?
Cheers,
Debarshi
--
One reason that life is complex is that it has a real part and an
imaginary part.
-- Andrew Koenig
--
devel mailing list
d
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 31/01/10 12:59, M A Young wrote:
>
>> At the moment it does for you, though more updates may be required
>> depending on what you have installed, but you also have to think longer
>> term, because the latest Fedora release and rawhide will tend to move
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> playmonoi16 (dst=0x76ddc0, len=,
> ch=) at mixasm.c:1746
Sorry for asking the obvious, but this hit me several times... is this
mixasm.c file part of the sources you are compiling w
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:30 AM, M A Young wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jan 2010, Frank Murphy wrote:
>
>> On 31/01/10 12:59, M A Young wrote:
>>
>>> At the moment it does for you, though more updates may be required
>>> depending on what you have installed, but you also have to think longer
>>> term, becau
Le Ven 29 janvier 2010 17:59, David Malcolm a écrit :
>
> On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 15:45 +, Rawhide Report wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> Looks like whatever generates this report is reordering items in the
> changelog relative to the %changelog in the specfile, but in some
> surprising ways; is this a k
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 07:32:06PM +0200, shmuel siegel wrote:
> On 1/29/2010 4:50 AM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> > On 01/28/2010 09:32 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
> >
> >> What is considered the best practice for packaging a program that uses
> >> strlcpy()?
> >>
> > Besides patching it to n
Hi Chen,
Chen Lei wrote:
> those packages were deprecated, so it should be reopened by cvs admin
> by you can take ownership.
Thanks for the hint. I'll use cvs admin requests [1] for the packages.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests
---
Victor
--
devel mailing list
devel@list
Heya,
I just committed and build gstreamer-plugins-bad-free to rawhide. This
package contains the -bad plugins shippable by Fedora.
If you maintain a version of gst-plugins-bad for a 3rd party repository,
or have a package that depends on either:
- gstreamer-plugins-flumpegdemux
or
- gstreamer-pl
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010, drago01 wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:30 AM, M A Young wrote:
>>
>> That doesn't work as nicely as perhaps it should because
>> yum downgrade firefox
>> only downgrades firefox and not xulrunner, and as a result the downgraded
>> firefox refuses to run. You need at least
>
On 30 January 2010 22:57, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 22:37 +, Mat Booth wrote:
>
>> Maybe but I agree with Braden: I don't think it's worth it. Seems like
>> a lot of extra work for not a lot of gain.
>
> Running a fully updated system, I upgraded to firefox-3.6 in rawhide
>
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 09:34:19AM +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> >
> > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > playmonoi16 (dst=0x76ddc0, len=,
> > ch=) at mixasm.c:1746
>
> Sorry for asking the obvious, but this hit me
I'm getting this error when trying to update
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/lib64/gstreamer-0.10/libgstmpegdemux.so from install of
gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.17-3.fc13.x86_64 conflicts with file
from package gstreamer-plugins-flumpegdemux-0.10.15-8.fc13.x86_64
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at
On 30 January 2010 07:33, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> The current PackageKit policy in F12 updates still allows upgrading (as
> opposed to installing or removing, not sure about downgrading, does
> PackageKit even support that?)
No, PackageKit won't let you downgrade a package.
> Is the bureaucracy in
Hi Kevin,
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Victor Vasilyev wrote:
>
>> However, I don't see such buttons associated with the rawhide for all
>> mentioned packages, i.e. bytelist, jcodings, and jvyamlb.
>> How I can take ownership of the packages in the devel branch, but not in
>> Fedora 11?
>>
> Thos
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Vivek Shah wrote:
> Hi Adam,
> I would be interested in comaintaining pida.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Vivek
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
Sounds good, just add
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> I have orphaned ldtp and pida. However there is something wrong wiwht
> glade3. Pressing the "release ownership" button is not orphaning it.
> Any ideas?
>
> Cheers,
> Debarshi
> --
> One reason that life is complex is that it has a real part a
Compose started at Mon Feb 1 08:15:03 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
PySolFC-cardsets-1.1-5.2.noarch requires PySolFC = 0:1.1
PySolFC-music-4.40-5.noarch requires PySolFC = 0:1.1
doodle-0.6.7-5.fc12.i686 requires li
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 13:27 +, leigh scott wrote:
> I'm getting this error when trying to update
>
> Transaction Check Error:
> file /usr/lib64/gstreamer-0.10/libgstmpegdemux.so from install of
> gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.17-3.fc13.x86_64 conflicts with file
> from package gstreamer-pl
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 01:18 -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> I'm trying to debug an issue for the upstream author of ocp and am
> running into an issue where gdb is showing "" for
> variables even though I've compiled the program with gcc -g -O0. Are
> there any gcc/gdb gurus who can help?
>
>
Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 09:34:19AM +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
>>> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>>> playmonoi16 (dst=0x76ddc0, len=,
>>>ch=) at mixasm.c:1746
>> Sorry for asking the obvio
On Friday 29 January 2010 06:35:21 Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 01/28/2010 04:06 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time, Ralf Corsepius said:
> >> On 01/27/2010 02:17 PM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> >>> Do you think moving this is a bad idea?
> >>
> >> Yes.
> >>
> >> The pciutils are valuable to
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 12:08 +, M A Young wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2010, drago01 wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:30 AM, M A Young wrote:
> >>
> >> That doesn't work as nicely as perhaps it should because
> >> yum downgrade firefox
> >> only downgrades firefox and not xulrunner, and as a re
On 2/1/2010 6:01 PM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> right, the point is lspci wont work without /usr, but can you give me
> any real
> world scenario where not having working pciutils on system with not mounted
> /usr can make any trouble that you won't be able to mount /usr without it?
>
>
For ins
On 02/01/2010 05:01 PM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> On Friday 29 January 2010 06:35:21 Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> Should setpci be used somewhere in bootup scripts, you likely won't be
>> able to boot up your system at all.
>
> and because libpci is in /usr for a long time and there was not any complai
Once upon a time, Ralf Corsepius said:
> IMO, you are facing a hen-and-egg problem: You've never seen such a
> complaint, because using a separate /usr partition has never worked on
> RH-based distros.
Please stop repeating this untrue statement. As I told you already, I
have used separate /us
Apologies for the noise, this is a test email that should make it to
de...@lists.fp.o :-)
Thanks,
Ricky
pgpApacHwp6ai.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
devel-announce mailing list
devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Ricky Zhou wrote:
> Apologies for the noise, this is a test email that should make it to
> de...@lists.fp.o :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Ricky
>
no problem
Itamar Reis Peixoto
e-mail/msn/google talk/sip: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br
skype: itamarjp
icq: 81053601
+5
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:13:06PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> >> I have no idea if it actually requires them to be alongside the
> >> executables, but hopefully the link will help.
> >
> > It doesn't. Also, ugh. I'm the one who actually rev
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> This is one reason I prefer to use the following changelog style
>
> * Thu Jan 28 2010 Michael Schwendt
> - 2.2-10
> - Fix tuple_copy() further (it was completely broken as the mowgli
> dict wasn't copied at all).
> - 2.2-9
> - Let set_tuple_cb() work on a copied tuple
Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> That's not the intent: "mechanism" is "the code that causes running
> something as root", in this case DBus activation, not "the code running
> as root" (a DBus server).
Oh, if that's the intent, that's of course perfectly fine.
I'd be happy to provide any needed documenta
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 13:38:13 -0500
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:13:06PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Jarod Wilson
> > wrote:
> > >> I have no idea if it actually requires them to be alongside the
> > >> executables, but hopefully the link
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-02-01/fedora-releng.2010-02-01-18.17.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-02-01/fedora-releng.2010-02-01-18.17.txt
Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-02-0
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:47:20 +0100, Kevin wrote:
> Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > This is one reason I prefer to use the following changelog style
> >
> > * Thu Jan 28 2010 Michael Schwendt
> > - 2.2-10
> > - Fix tuple_copy() further (it was completely broken as the mowgli
> > dict wasn't copied a
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 01:38:13PM -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
> 1) The present packages need to be fixecd. Sounds like fipscheck, hmaccalc,
> and openssh. They are violating the FHS which is prohibited by the
> Guidelines. Ralf, have you opened bugs?
>
> 2) We need to decide where to plac
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Spins_Fedora_13
>
> Some of those are kickstart only and won't have prebuilt isos for
> download.
In addition to these spins, there are also the 2 permanent live spins (GNOME
and KDE) and the non-live installers (DVD, CD set, netin
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Mat Booth wrote:
> On 30 January 2010 22:57, Mike Chambers wrote:
>> On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 22:37 +, Mat Booth wrote:
>>> Maybe but I agree with Braden: I don't think it's worth it. Seems like
>>> a lot of extra work for not a lot of gain.
>> Running a fully upd
Le lundi 01 février 2010 à 19:47 +0100, Kevin Kofler a écrit :
> Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > This is one reason I prefer to use the following changelog style
> >
> > * Thu Jan 28 2010 Michael Schwendt <>
> > - 2.2-10
> > - Fix tuple_copy() further (it was completely broken as the mowgli
> > dict
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 01:03:11PM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
> >> However, this changes behavior that has existed since the dawn
> >> of time in Red Hat/Fedora systems; with this change, single-user
> >> mode would now require the root password.
> >> Comments?
> I'm totally in favor of it. It is som
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 06:47:38PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Well, I understand the problem that this patch is addressing.
> However, the ability to get root shell on runlevel 1 without
> root password has always been a time saver when you forgot it
> or couldn't contact the pr
On 1 February 2010 19:23, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Mat Booth wrote:
>> On 30 January 2010 22:57, Mike Chambers wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 22:37 +, Mat Booth wrote:
Maybe but I agree with Braden: I don't think it's worth it. Seems like
a lot of
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 12:33 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 17:04 +, Mat Booth wrote:
> > On 29 January 2010 17:00, Pierre-Yves wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 11:59 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > >> Here's where it gets weird:
> > >> 0.6.10-1 then 0.6.10-2 then 0.6.9-4
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Milos Jakubicek wrote:
> On 31.1.2010 01:24, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
>
>>
>> Anyway, the discussion was good and maybe it is useful to other people
>> too.
>>
>>
> :)
>
> Well, really: if you want to change something, file the bugreport, or get
> in touch with re
On 15 January 2010 11:03, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> 2010/1/14 Matthew Garrett :
>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 01:46:52PM +0100, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
>>
>>> thats exactly what i am "complaining" about. it states that burning
>>> failed. id expect it to tell me that polling failed. thats not really
>>> "ran
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Sure it is, it's changelog style #3 of
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs
No, it's not style #3. It's 2 or more style #3 entries collapsed into 1,
which is not one of the allowed formats.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lis
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 11:16:54AM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Ralf Corsepius said:
> > IMO, you are facing a hen-and-egg problem: You've never seen such a
> > complaint, because using a separate /usr partition has never worked on
> > RH-based distros.
>
> Please stop repeatin
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 20:00UTC (3pm EST) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Followups:
#314 Wordpress bundles libraries
#324 naming conflict: surf
#320 Feature: Modprobe whitelist (
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Mo
I feel like I'm neglecting the terminator package because I don't have
enough time to send the bugs and feature requests upstream or debug them
myself. Anybody interested, give me a shout and I'll let the package go
in pkgdb.
--
Ian Weller
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 10:31 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 1:20 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > Well, reboot is a one-time operation; if there's only one user logged
> > in, they can only affect themselves by rebooting. Adjusting the clock or
> > installing new software i
On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 08:55 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > I think it's sensible, yeah. It's not really much bureaucracy; I don't
> > think it would ever be a good idea to introduce a new privilege
> > escalation mechanism without FESco knowing about it...
>
> Right now we
Looking at the build logs for F-12, e.g.:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/glib2/2.22.4/1.fc12/data/logs/i686/build.log
we seem to have things set up to run configure as:
--build=i386-redhat-linux-gnu
--host=i386-redhat-linux-gnu
--target=i686-redhat-linux-gnu
Which, according to m
Start End Name
Thu 04-Feb Thu 04-Feb Create Installable Images for QA testing #3
Fri 05-Feb Fri 05-Feb Alpha Blocker Meeting (F13Alpha) #1
Tue 09-Feb Tue 09-Feb Feature Freeze (Testable|Complete)
Tue 09-Feb Tue 09-Feb Spins Freeze
Tue 09-Feb Tue 09-Feb Branch Fedora 13 from
Hi again, folks. Here is another draft of the privilege escalation
policy. This is the sixth draft (second to this list). Changes: one of
Kevin Kofler's queries alerted me to the fact that somehow all the
changes between draft 1 and draft 2 were lost from drafts 3 onwards,
d'oh :) They are restored
Owen Taylor (otay...@redhat.com) said:
> Looking at the build logs for F-12, e.g.:
>
> http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/glib2/2.22.4/1.fc12/data/logs/i686/build.log
>
> we seem to have things set up to run configure as:
>
> --build=i386-redhat-linux-gnu
> --host=i386-redhat-linux-gn
Am Montag, den 01.02.2010, 17:07 -0600 schrieb Ian Weller:
> I feel like I'm neglecting the terminator package because I don't have
> enough time to send the bugs and feature requests upstream or debug them
> myself. Anybody interested, give me a shout and I'll let the package go
> in pkgdb.
I'd l
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 08:39:15AM -0600, Adam Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> > I have orphaned ldtp and pida. However there is something wrong wiwht
> > glade3. Pressing the "release ownership" button is not orphaning it.
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > D
> I've reassigned glade3 to maxamillion.
Thank you very much.
Cheers,
Debarshi
--
One reason that life is complex is that it has a real part and an
imaginary part.
-- Andrew Koenig
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Author: philipp
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Text-vCard/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22747
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
perl-Text-vCard.spec
Log Message:
Initial commit of v2.07.
--- NEW FILE perl-Text-vCard.spec ---
Name:
On 02/01/2010 10:23 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 11:16:54AM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
>> Once upon a time, Ralf Corsepius said:
>>> IMO, you are facing a hen-and-egg problem: You've never seen such a
>>> complaint, because using a separate /usr partition has never worked on
On 28/01/10 01:03, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Unblocked orphan backintime
In principle I'll take this to keep it in Fedora since I use it and it's a
nice app. However with limited time I wasn't in a great rush to add any more
packages to my list so if anyone else would like to take over I'd happily
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> The "emergency scenario" (/usr not being available) does not work with
> Fedora and probably all RH-based distros, because there are packages in
> /bin/* /sbin/*, which are dynamically linked against libraries in /usr/lib*.
When you said "us
Once upon a time, Ralf Corsepius said:
> On 02/01/2010 10:23 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 11:16:54AM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> >> Once upon a time, Ralf Corsepius said:
> >>> IMO, you are facing a hen-and-egg problem: You've never seen such a
> >>> complaint, because u
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 02:03:21AM +0100, Dominic Hopf wrote:
> Am Montag, den 01.02.2010, 17:07 -0600 schrieb Ian Weller:
> > I feel like I'm neglecting the terminator package because I don't have
> > enough time to send the bugs and feature requests upstream or debug them
> > myself. Anybody inte
62 matches
Mail list logo
