Enrico Scholz writes:
> I have problems to understand the xmlrpc-c build failure
>
> | /usr/bin/ld.bfd: xml-rpc-api2cpp.5842.test: undefined reference to symbol
> 'pthread_cancel@@GLIBC_2.2.5'
It happens because a library where the program is linked against uses
pthread_* but is not linked agai
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 01:15 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 January 2010, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 01:59 +0100, Milos Jakubicek wrote:
> > > Also I have really doubts what concerns upstreamability of the necessary
> > > changes in packages. Especially if other d
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 20:04 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 00:06 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> >
> > if so, Mandriva has been enforcing the fixing of this type of error for
> > a couple of years now (by having --as-needed and --no-undefined in the
> > default ld flags).
Le dimanche 10 janvier 2010 08:06:11, Kevin Fenzi a écrit :
> rineau:BADSOURCE:figtoipe-20080505.tar.gz:figtoipe
> rineau:BADSOURCE:ipe-6.0pre32patch1-src.tar.gz:ipe
Does the change of URLs of Source0 worths a rebuild in Rawhide, or is the cvs
commit sufficient?
--
Laurent Rineau
http://fedorap
Laurent Rineau wrote:
> Le dimanche 10 janvier 2010 08:06:11, Kevin Fenzi a écrit :
>
>> rineau:BADSOURCE:figtoipe-20080505.tar.gz:figtoipe
>> rineau:BADSOURCE:ipe-6.0pre32patch1-src.tar.gz:ipe
>>
>
> Does the change of URLs of Source0 worths a rebuild in Rawhide, or is the cvs
> commit su
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:54:40 -0500, Matthias wrote:
> > The old semantics made this case work without the .la file, the new
> > semantics lead to programs failing to link in Fedora, making Fedora
> > incompatible with upstream (unless we start to ship .la files again).
>
> .pc files handle this
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:04:21 +, Adam wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 20:04 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 00:06 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > if so, Mandriva has been enforcing the fixing of this type of error for
> > > a couple of years now (by having
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 12:23 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:54:40 -0500, Matthias wrote:
>
> > > The old semantics made this case work without the .la file, the new
> > > semantics lead to programs failing to link in Fedora, making Fedora
> > > incompatible with upstream (u
Compose started at Wed Jan 13 08:15:05 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
DeviceKit-disks-009-3.fc12.i686 requires libparted-1.9.so.0
PyKDE-3.16.6-1.fc13.i686 requires sip-api(6) >= 0:6.0
anjal-0.1.0-1.fc13.i686 requires
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 02:19:16AM +0100, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
> Le 13/01/2010 02:07, Tom Lane a écrit :
> >
> > Why exactly is this a misuse, and not libxml2's bug to fix? There's
> > certainly nothing in their documentation suggesting that there's
> > such a requirement.
there is definitely,
- "Jussi Lehtola" wrote:
>
> So is --as-needed within the current default flags?
As far as I know, no. The default will still be --no-as-needed.
If anyone reading this is interested/confused, I think the
difference is:
The --as-needed flag will link libraries if
A) they define symbols re
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 02:04:16PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> ocaml-camlimages-3.0.2-1.fc13.i686 requires ocaml(Image_intf) =
> 0:f81d11976accf8db51fbce0ac90013cb
A bug .. now fixed.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
libguestfs let
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 05:36:18PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 04:21:08PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 12:06:11AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > rjones:BADURL:expat-2.0.1.tar.gz:mingw32-expat
> > > rjones:BADURL:mingwrt-3.15.2-mingw32-src.tar.g
On 01/12/2010 10:42 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> My f12 + updates + updates-testing box is unhappy with the current state of
> the repo.
> Yum complains..
>
> Transaction Check Error:
>package nss-3.12.5-2.fc12.x86_64 (which is newer than
> nss-3.12.4-14.fc12.i686) is already installed
>
> What ha
Hi Guys,
>> SystemTap is failing on pthread_cancel, which is odd since we have no
>> mention of pthread in our own sources. It seems to be pulled in by some
>> headers in the STL. Consider this minimal example:
>>
>> $ cat string.cxx
>> #include
>> int main()
>> {
>> return std::string("foo
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 07:25:23AM -0800, Elio Maldonado wrote:
> On 01/12/2010 10:42 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> > My f12 + updates + updates-testing box is unhappy with the current state of
> > the repo.
> > Yum complains..
> >
> > Transaction Check Error:
> >package nss-3.12.5-2.fc12.x86_64 (wh
commit 9f88491132cb2d1c5f11fd5475e1a6826e1dc7ee
Author: Endi S. Dewata
Date: Tue Jan 12 14:43:08 2010 -0600
Bug 553027 - Support for nsUniqueId and alias in Retro Changelog.
This patch adds support for storing the target's nsUniqueId in
change log re
cord and renaming any addition
Fedora Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for x86_64
using rawhide as of 2010-01-10. This is a full rebuild of all 8812 packages.
Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
44 Open Bugs which now build, and can be marked CLOSED RAWHIDE:
aldo: [u'539058']
apbs: [u'538881']
arts
Fedora Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for i386
using rawhide as of 2010-01-10. This is a full rebuild of all 8812 packages.
Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
44 Open Bugs which now build, and can be marked CLOSED RAWHIDE:
aldo: [u'539058']
apbs: [u'538881']
arts:
On 01/13/2010 08:24 AM, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
>>> SystemTap is failing on pthread_cancel, which is odd since we have no
>>> mention of pthread in our own sources. It seems to be pulled in by some
>>> headers in the STL. Consider this minimal example:
>>>
>>> $ cat string.cxx
>>> #inclu
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 10:53 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> R-pls: [u'538957']
Pending for stable
Regards,
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 16:24 +, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> >> SystemTap is failing on pthread_cancel, which is odd since we have no
> >> mention of pthread in our own sources. It seems to be pulled in by some
> >> headers in the STL. Consider this minimal example:
> >>
> >> $ cat string.
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:01:54 +0100
Laurent Rineau wrote:
> Le dimanche 10 janvier 2010 08:06:11, Kevin Fenzi a écrit :
> > rineau:BADSOURCE:figtoipe-20080505.tar.gz:figtoipe
> > rineau:BADSOURCE:ipe-6.0pre32patch1-src.tar.gz:ipe
>
> Does the change of URLs of Source0 worths a rebuild in Rawhide,
Hi folks,
This lwn article reports that berlios.de has been compromised for a long,
long time.
http://lwn.net/Articles/369633/
So I compiled a little list of pkgs that need a look:
http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/berlios-pkg-owners-list.txt
Here is the list as well:
arbiter:slim:http:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:10:06PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 16:24 +, Nick Clifton wrote:
> > >> $ g++ -o string string.o -ldb
> > >> /usr/bin/ld.bfd: string.11980.test: undefined reference to symbol
> > >> 'pthread_cancel@@GLIBC_2.2.5'
> > >> /usr/bin/ld.bfd: note: 'pt
Hello,
according to the policy for non-responsive package maintainers:
Does anyone know how to contact igjurisk (Igor Jurišković)?
I have been trying to do so for the past 2 weeks. (see #552351)
Thanks a lot,
Andreas
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraprojec
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 10:51 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> gmrun-0.9.2-16.fc11 (build/make) gilboa
A fixed gmrun is already in F12 updates-testing and rawhide.
- Gilboa
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hello,
according to the policy for non-responsive package maintainers:
Does anyone know how to contact igjurisk (Igor Jurišković)?
I have been trying to do so for the past 2 weeks. (see #552351)
Thanks a lot,
Andreas
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraprojec
I'm orphaning nagios, nrpe and nagios-plugins. I just don't use them
anymore. If you use them and want to help out, get too it!
-Mike
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hello All!
2010/1/13 Mike McGrath :
> I'm orphaning nagios, nrpe and nagios-plugins. I just don't use them
> anymore. If you use them and want to help out, get too it!
I can take nagios and nagios-plugins. Anyone else volunteering?
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
devel mailing list
- Original Message -
From: "Toshio Kuratomi"
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 8:27:02 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: Re: nss version went backwards ?
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 07:25:23AM -0800, Elio Maldonado wrote:
> On 01/12/201
Seth Vidal wrote:
> Hi folks,
> This lwn article reports that berlios.de has been compromised for a long,
> long time.
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/369633/
>
> So I compiled a little list of pkgs that need a look:
>
> http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/berlios-pkg-owners-list.txt
>
>
> Here is
>
> - "Jussi Lehtola" wrote:
> >
> > So is --as-needed within the current default flags?
>
> As far as I know, no. The default will still be --no-as-needed.
That's correct. This change does not affect --as-needed at all.
> The --as-needed flag will link libraries if
> A) they define symb
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello All!
>
> 2010/1/13 Mike McGrath :
>> I'm orphaning nagios, nrpe and nagios-plugins. I just don't use them
>> anymore. If you use them and want to help out, get too it!
>
> I can take nagios and nagios-plugins. Anyone else volunteerin
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 18:07 +0100, Pierre-Yves wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 10:53 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > R-pls: [u'538957']
> Pending for stable
>
> Regards,
> Pierre
>
Stable what? these are rawhide things that don't rebuild.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.c
2010/1/13 Matt Domsch :
> jline-0.9.94-0.4.fc12 (build/make) mbooth
Looks like you missed out on Mr. Kurtakov's fix for this one by the
narrowest of margins. (Thanks Alex.)
--
Mat Booth
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 10:56 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 18:07 +0100, Pierre-Yves wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 10:53 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > > R-pls: [u'538957']
> > Pending for stable
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pierre
> >
>
> Stable what? these are rawhide things tha
Hi There
I am also happy to help with any of the three packages or co-maintain the three.
Jesus
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Lemenkov"
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 7:08:42 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin /
Bern / Rome /
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 10:52 -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > - "Jussi Lehtola" wrote:
> > >
> > > So is --as-needed within the current default flags?
> >
> > As far as I know, no. The default will still be --no-as-needed.
>
> That's correct. This change does not affect --as-needed at all.
Pierre-Yves writes:
> IMHO R2spec is here to help packagers to create/generate spec file
> as close as possible to the Fedora standards.
> Fedora's RPM will never be generated fully automatically and be
> maintained without human intervention that's against its philosophy.
I clearly need t
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 12:33 -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> Seth Vidal wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > This lwn article reports that berlios.de has been compromised for a long,
> > long time.
> > if you're on this list then you need to talk to upstream and find out if
> > they have done an audit yet. You
On Wed, 13.01.10 16:00, Daniel Veillard (veill...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > Afaik it does, i agree with Lennart that a warning from libxml2 would be
> > welcome.
>
> The problem is that you can perfectly have application not relying on
> libxml2 outside of their own code use libxml2 at different p
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> Seth Vidal wrote:
>>
>>
> Thanks, Seth. And if we don't, what's a good resource for security
> auditing n00bs?
1) Look over the change history. Don't trust the source repository but
older versions of the tar balls and see what has changed bet
> > That's correct. In other words, the libfoo.so DSO will only be used at
> > runtime if the presence of -lfoo at link time actually had any effect on
> > what symbols got resolved to what. But --as-needed is not really apropos
> > in this thread.
>
> OK, if RPM picks only the libraries that ar
> Right - Obviously I had not considered the case of a weak reference to a
> symbol defined in an as-needed DSO. I'll look into it today.
You're going to confuse the poor bystanders by using the wrong terminology.
There is no issue with as-needed. It's only --no-add-needed we are talking
about
> But, you have added an explicit dependency upon libdb to your executable
> by mentioning -ldb on the gcc command line. Therefore libdb will be
> loaded at execution start-up. But libdb has a dependency upon
> libpthread, so that library will also be loaded at execution start-up.
> Hence whe
Lennart Poettering writes:
> There's something else that came to my mind: if libxml2 is loaded into
> memory indirectly because some dlopen'ed module wanted it, and then
> used, and then unloaded again because the module got dlcose'd again,
> won't you leak TLS vars unless the xmlCleanupParser() f
On Wed, 13.01.10 16:07, Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> Lennart Poettering writes:
> > There's something else that came to my mind: if libxml2 is loaded into
> > memory indirectly because some dlopen'ed module wanted it, and then
> > used, and then unloaded again because the module got dlc
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:39:43 +0100
Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 13.01.10 16:07, Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> >
> > Lennart Poettering writes:
> > > There's something else that came to my mind: if libxml2 is loaded
> > > into memory indirectly because some dlopen'ed module wante
Daniel Veillard wrote:
> The problem is that you can perfectly have application not relying on
> libxml2 outside of their own code use libxml2 at different phases,
> for example when parsing input, and when generating result, not using
> the library in the meantime and calling xmlCleanupParser() tw
Once upon a time, Stephen John Smoogen said:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> > Thanks, Seth. And if we don't, what's a good resource for security
> > auditing n00bs?
>
> 1) Look over the change history. Don't trust the source repository but
> older versions of the tar bal
On Wed, 13.01.10 16:54, Simo Sorce (sso...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > Oh, and let's note that other libraries have exactly the same
> > probs. Let's pick dbus for example which many might consider a
> > benchmark in many ways. There is dbus_shutdown() which does about the
> > same thing as xmlCleanupP
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 12:23 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
> Hi folks,
> This lwn article reports that berlios.de has been compromised for a long,
> long time.
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/369633/
>
> So I compiled a little list of pkgs that need a look:
>
> http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/berl
This is a heads-up that the python3 package review [1] is done (thanks
everyone!) and that python3 is now in Fedora [2]
I've built python3-3.1.1-14.fc13 into rawhide here:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1919905
I hope I haven't broken anything; I've been running with both vers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13/01/10 03:41 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> This is a heads-up that the python3 package review [1] is done (thanks
> everyone!) and that python3 is now in Fedora [2]
>
> I've built python3-3.1.1-14.fc13 into rawhide here:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/13/2010 09:05 AM, John Reiser wrote:
> *weak undefined* means "I accept *any* definition, or even *no* definition."
> Both binutils and glibc must fix their errors of insisting on any particular
> symbol version for a *weak undefined* symbol.
No
56 matches
Mail list logo
