Re: yum tidy-cache

2013-05-05 Thread Frank Murphy
On Sun, 5 May 2013 14:45:17 +0100 Frank Murphy wrote: Apology for self reply > but repomanage seems to act on a named dir, > as distinct from working on yum cachedir. > > Am uncertain as to use in culling all repos within keepcache=1 > It may work as "repomanage -n /var/cache/yum I had been t

Re: yum tidy-cache

2013-05-05 Thread Frank Murphy
On Sun, 05 May 2013 06:35:37 -0700 John Reiser wrote: > > Asking was yum tidy-cache ever in Fedora? > > http://freecode.com/projects/tidy-yum-cache-plugin > > How does that compare to "repomanage -o" from the yum-utils package? > That's not a plugin, but

Re: yum tidy-cache

2013-05-05 Thread John Reiser
> Asking was yum tidy-cache ever in Fedora? > http://freecode.com/projects/tidy-yum-cache-plugin How does that compare to "repomanage -o" from the yum-utils package? That's not a plugin, but it does say which are the obsoleted package versions. -- -- dev

yum tidy-cache

2013-05-05 Thread Frank Murphy
Asking was yum tidy-cache ever in Fedora? http://freecode.com/projects/tidy-yum-cache-plugin No upstream activity since 2009: Couldn't find any mention of it being so using term "yum-tidy-cache" -- Regards, Frank - I check for new mail every 20min www.frankly3d.com -- devel mai