Am 27.05.2011 20:50, schrieb Panu Matilainen:
> On 05/27/2011 07:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 27.05.2011 17:54, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
>>> Reindl Harald wrote:
yes, 150 MB
>>>
>>> That's not enough. Try again with 1 or 2 GiB of swap space
>>
>> as said, i had a machine with 5 GB sw
On 05/27/2011 07:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 27.05.2011 17:54, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
>> Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> yes, 150 MB
>>
>> That's not enough. Try again with 1 or 2 GiB of swap space
>
> as said, i had a machine with 5 GB swap and the braindead oom-killer
> started to shoot down pro
Am 27.05.2011 17:54, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>> yes, 150 MB
>
> That's not enough. Try again with 1 or 2 GiB of swap space
as said, i had a machine with 5 GB swap and the braindead oom-killer
started to shoot down process long before the swap was used
the only real solutio
Reindl Harald wrote:
> yes, 150 MB
That's not enough. Try again with 1 or 2 GiB of swap space.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Am 27.05.2011 12:18, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>> tonight on a virtual machine with 512 MB RAM yum-upgrade
>> from fedora 13 to fedora 14, oom-killer played butcher while
>> refreshing the kmod-open-vm-tools while depmod was running
>
> Do you have any swap space configured? Y
Reindl Harald wrote:
> tonight on a virtual machine with 512 MB RAM yum-upgrade
> from fedora 13 to fedora 14, oom-killer played butcher while
> refreshing the kmod-open-vm-tools while depmod was running
Do you have any swap space configured? You should have some.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel
Am 27.05.2011 11:45, schrieb Michael Schroeder:
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 06:00:57PM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
>> You're definitely right that applydeltarpm has a *far* lower memory
>> footprint than createdeltarpm. But, looking at the original traceback,
>> it looks like it isn't getting enou
