Jens Petersen (peter...@redhat.com) said:
> I meant to add that the reason this came up was I was trying to work out
> where to put yum-langpacks in comps: yum-presto being one of the reference
> packages I searched for.
>
> So where can/should yum-langpacks live?
Probably in base. Now whether i
Kevin Kofler (kevin.kof...@chello.at) said:
> +1
>
> In fact, we voted in FESCo that it should be added to one of the base groups
> instead (@base, I guess). It makes no sense to have it in @gnome-desktop nor
> in the KDE .ks file (which is where it is at the moment – for KDE, it's in
> the .k
I meant to add that the reason this came up was I was trying to work out
where to put yum-langpacks in comps: yum-presto being one of the reference
packages I searched for.
So where can/should yum-langpacks live?
Jens
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraprojec
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 05:17:20AM -0500, Jens Petersen wrote:
> > I guess I would be fine with it being in @base or something.
>
> Just wondered does it have any implications for mock?
Mock uses the buildsys-build group iirc.
Regards
Till
pgpBpwH1XyXcy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
deve
> I guess I would be fine with it being in @base or something.
Just wondered does it have any implications for mock?
Jens
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
