Am 25.10.20 um 22:47 schrieb Leigh Scott:
See
https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2020/10/2020-10-23-RIAA.md
Githubs CEO has contacted the youtube-dl devs to help them getting
theire repo back online:
http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/4zuP1Ce7AJU/riaas-youtube-dl-takedow
On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 10:16 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 09:47:42 +
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 08:33 +, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > > > I don't know what IANAL means but sounds rude...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 00:14, Fabi
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020, at 1:46 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 13:33, Colin Walters wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020, at 12:16 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
> > >
> > > There is a maintained upstream for bsd-games [1] that has effectively
> > > forked the old codeba
On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 13:33, Colin Walters wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020, at 12:16 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
> >
> > There is a maintained upstream for bsd-games [1] that has effectively
> > forked the old codebase and trimmed out some of the bits which are not
> > quite games including wtf (the
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020, at 12:16 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
>
> There is a maintained upstream for bsd-games [1] that has effectively
> forked the old codebase and trimmed out some of the bits which are not
> quite games including wtf (the readme says "outdated acronym lookup. We
> have Google now."). Ho
On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 09:47:42 +
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 08:33 +, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > > I don't know what IANAL means but sounds rude...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 00:14, Fabio Valentini
> > > >
> > LOL :-)
> >
> > IANAL=I am not a lawyer
>
On 26.10.2020 12:32, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
IANAL, but I think that the crux of the RIAA's request is that the offending
code used as an evidence of copyright-circumventing nature of the source
code as a whole, so it's not that simple
Next time they will try to block all torrent clients, t
On 26.10.2020 12:40, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Notice that what I proposed provides opt-in censorship. People can use
the list from RIAA if they need to but nobody is forced to use the list.
That is not the same as silently censoring things.
Such a list would make it much easier to block applicat
Le lun. 26 oct. 2020 à 12:10, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
a écrit :
>
> On 26.10.2020 11:29, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> > I've recently made some suggestions about using IPFS as part of the
> > packaging workflow[1]
>
> Censorship is evil. If the copyright holders complain about any
> packages, they shou
On 26/10/2020 12:09, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 26.10.2020 11:29, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> I've recently made some suggestions about using IPFS as part of the
>> packaging workflow[1]
>
> Censorship is evil. If the copyright holders complain about any
> packages, they should be moved to
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:13:07PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 26.10.2020 11:28, Damian Ivanov wrote:
> >Well if some tests do download copyrighted material,
> >I wonder how this has become blocked in the first place...
>
> I think upstream can easily move the tests to a separate r
On 26.10.2020 11:28, Damian Ivanov wrote:
Well if some tests do download copyrighted material,
I wonder how this has become blocked in the first place...
I think upstream can easily move the tests to a separate repository and
remove the copyrighted URLs from the documentation.
--
Sincerely,
On 26.10.2020 11:29, Daniel Pocock wrote:
I've recently made some suggestions about using IPFS as part of the
packaging workflow[1]
Censorship is evil. If the copyright holders complain about any
packages, they should be moved to RPM Fusion repository.
We don't need any registries at all. Do
On 26/10/2020 10:53, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 25.10.2020 22:47, Leigh Scott wrote:
>> https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2020/10/2020-10-23-RIAA.md
>
> Self-censorship is the worst thing in the world. We shouldn't do
> anything with this.
I've recently made some suggestions
Well if some tests do download copyrighted material,
I wonder how this has become blocked in the first place...
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:24 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 26.10.2020 11:00, Damian Ivanov wrote:
> > If you check the fork and what has been removed,
> > it will be obviou
On 26.10.2020 11:00, Damian Ivanov wrote:
If you check the fork and what has been removed,
it will be obvious how this happened
Yes, they removed some tests and links from the README. But I think the
package maintainer should wait for upstream reaction first. The new fork
is owned by third-pa
If you check the fork and what has been removed,
it will be obvious how this happened
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 11:54 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 25.10.2020 22:47, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2020/10/2020-10-23-RIAA.md
>
> Self-censorship is the w
On 25.10.2020 22:47, Leigh Scott wrote:
https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2020/10/2020-10-23-RIAA.md
Self-censorship is the worst thing in the world. We shouldn't do
anything with this.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
__
On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 08:33 +, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > I don't know what IANAL means but sounds rude...
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 00:14, Fabio Valentini
> >
> LOL :-)
>
> IANAL=I am not a lawyer
you may install wtf [1] (part of bsd-games package) and query aboutthis acronym
> I don't know what IANAL means but sounds rude...
>
>
>
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 00:14, Fabio Valentini wrote:
LOL :-)
IANAL=I am not a lawyer
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists
I don't know what IANAL means but sounds rude...
On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 00:14, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 10:52 PM Christian Dersch
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 25/10/2020 22:47, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > > See
> > >
> > > https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2020/10/2020-
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 10:52 PM Christian Dersch
wrote:
>
>
> On 25/10/2020 22:47, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > See
> >
> > https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2020/10/2020-10-23-RIAA.md
>
>
> There is already a fork of youtube-dl removing the critical parts, maybe
> we should switch if Fedora h
On 25/10/2020 22:47, Leigh Scott wrote:
See
https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2020/10/2020-10-23-RIAA.md
There is already a fork of youtube-dl removing the critical parts, maybe
we should switch if Fedora has to remove original youtube-dl for legal
reasons: https://github.com/l1vi
See
https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2020/10/2020-10-23-RIAA.md
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/
24 matches
Mail list logo
