On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:46 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 17 2021 at 03:10:11 PM +0100, Hans de Goede
> wrote:
> > Note this does not takeaway that the classic Xorg server packages
> > could definitely use some love / use some community co-maintainers.
>
> If xgl-maint isn't going
On Fri, Dec 17 2021 at 03:10:11 PM +0100, Hans de Goede
wrote:
Note this does not takeaway that the classic Xorg server packages
could definitely use some love / use some community co-maintainers.
If xgl-maint isn't going to maintain the packages anymore, orphaning
them is the right thing to
Hi Fabio,
On 12/17/21 12:21, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With the recent updates to use a standalone xwayland package, the
> "classic" xorg-x11-server package seems to have fallen into disrepair.
> It is multiple versions behind upstream (Fedora has 1.20.11, upstream
> has released 1.20.
*** It is multiple versions behind upstream (Fedora has 1.20.11,
upstream has released 1.20.12, 1.20.13, 1.20.14, 21.1.0, 21.1.1,
21.1.2), and has open CVE issues attached to it. ***
On Fri, 2021-12-17 at 12:21 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With the recent updates to use a standa
Hi all,
With the recent updates to use a standalone xwayland package, the
"classic" xorg-x11-server package seems to have fallen into disrepair.
It is multiple versions behind upstream (Fedora has 1.20.11, upstream
has released 1.20.12, 1.20.13, 1.20.14, 21.1.0, 21.1.1, 21.1.2), and
has open CVE i
