Re: why are is subversion 1.7 for F16/F17 removed

2012-03-12 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 12.03.2012 22:49, schrieb Jesse Keating: > Every package is different. While the subversion update required > hand management to bring up to date, the dbmail may not have (note > I do not know if this is true or not) what i meant here is why the maintainer does not update to stable release

Re: [PARTLY SOLVED] Re: why are is subversion 1.7 for F16/F17 removed

2012-03-12 Thread drago01
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 12.03.2012 20:43, schrieb drago01: >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Reindl Harald >> wrote: >> >>> the F17 src.rpm can not be rebuilded with "rpmbuild --rebuild" >>> on F16 because BuildRequirements  - so i am f**ed up because >>

Re: why are is subversion 1.7 for F16/F17 removed

2012-03-12 Thread Jesse Keating
On 3/12/12 12:59 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > I'm not sure. Install the build deps needed to rebuild the f17 SRPMs? they are NOT solveable for the available src.rpms on F16 that is why it makes me so crazy that once built and working packages are removed in the meantime > don't do the testing

[PARTLY SOLVED] Re: why are is subversion 1.7 for F16/F17 removed

2012-03-12 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 12.03.2012 20:43, schrieb drago01: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > >> the F17 src.rpm can not be rebuilded with "rpmbuild --rebuild" >> on F16 because BuildRequirements - so i am f**ed up because >> tessted and expected after all is running fine this was >> pushed

Re: why are is subversion 1.7 for F16/F17 removed

2012-03-12 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 12.03.2012 20:33, schrieb Jon Ciesla: He expected that it /would/ be pushed to stable. >>> >>> Well, yes. And I can understand that. But as you said, that's no >>> guarantee it'll ever hit stable. >> >> but what should i do now a half year later >> >> i need subversion >= 1.7.0, this wa

Re: why are is subversion 1.7 for F16/F17 removed

2012-03-12 Thread drago01
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > the F17 src.rpm can not be rebuilded with "rpmbuild --rebuild" > on F16 because BuildRequirements  - so i am f**ed up because > tessted and expected after all is running fine this was > pushed to stable updates long ago Well that does not h

Re: why are is subversion 1.7 for F16/F17 removed

2012-03-12 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 12.03.2012 19:16, schrieb Paul W. Frields: >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:46:08PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Jesse Keating >>> wrote: On 3/12/12 10:43 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > No, it lo

Re: why are is subversion 1.7 for F16/F17 removed

2012-03-12 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 12.03.2012 18:46, schrieb Jon Ciesla: >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Jesse Keating >> wrote: >>> On 3/12/12 10:43 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: No, it looks like it stayed in testing because the version was updated.  I d

Re: why are is subversion 1.7 for F16/F17 removed

2012-03-12 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 12.03.2012 19:16, schrieb Paul W. Frields: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:46:08PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Jesse Keating >> wrote: >>> On 3/12/12 10:43 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: No, it looks like it stayed in testing because the version was update

Re: why are is subversion 1.7 for F16/F17 removed

2012-03-12 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 12.03.2012 18:46, schrieb Jon Ciesla: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Jesse Keating > wrote: >> On 3/12/12 10:43 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >>> >>> No, it looks like it stayed in testing because the version was >>> updated. I don't see where it was ever in stable. >>> >>> https://admin.fedora

Re: why are is subversion 1.7 for F16/F17 removed

2012-03-12 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:46:08PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Jesse Keating > wrote: > > On 3/12/12 10:43 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > >> > >> No, it looks like it stayed in testing because the version was > >> updated.  I don't see where it was ever in stable. > >> >

Re: why are is subversion 1.7 for F16/F17 removed

2012-03-12 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 12.03.2012 17:44, schrieb Paul Howarth: >> On 03/12/2012 03:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> working since many motnhs with: >>> subversion-1.7.0-2.fc15.x86_64 >>> subversion-libs-1.7.0-2.fc15.x86_64 >>> >>> http://koji.fedoraproject.o

Re: why are is subversion 1.7 for F16/F17 removed

2012-03-12 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 12.03.2012 17:44, schrieb Paul Howarth: > On 03/12/2012 03:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> working since many motnhs with: >> subversion-1.7.0-2.fc15.x86_64 >> subversion-libs-1.7.0-2.fc15.x86_64 >> >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=752 >> >> all the 1.7 packages are r

Re: why are is subversion 1.7 for F16/F17 removed

2012-03-12 Thread Paul Howarth
On 03/12/2012 03:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: working since many motnhs with: subversion-1.7.0-2.fc15.x86_64 subversion-libs-1.7.0-2.fc15.x86_64 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=752 all the 1.7 packages are removed for F15/F16 now so after distro-sync to F16 downgradded t

why are is subversion 1.7 for F16/F17 removed

2012-03-12 Thread Reindl Harald
working since many motnhs with: subversion-1.7.0-2.fc15.x86_64 subversion-libs-1.7.0-2.fc15.x86_64 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=752 all the 1.7 packages are removed for F15/F16 now so after distro-sync to F16 downgradded to subversion-1.6.17-5.fc16.x86_64 and now? WHY