On 04/09/2010 09:42 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
ignored from then on?
>
> Depends on your laptop. There seem to be two major varieties.
>
> One is where there's a BIOS option and you can pick. Your options will
> typically be "integrated" (where we'll pick intel), "discrete" (where
> we'll pick no
gt; are you saying this will happen even without vga_switcharoo ?
Pretty sure this was in F12. And yes, doesn't depend on the switcher
code at all.
> Do I assume then when I install f12 (f12?) that the intel wins the race
> to fedora's display heart and nvidia will be powered do
VIDIA one. But I'm just guessing :)
>>
>> I guessed the same, until google found claims to the contrary '-)
>
> nouveau has powered down the nvidia if it's not in use for some time
> now.
>
Ah that is good news ... which kernel are we speaking about here
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 08:27:12PM -0400, Mail Lists wrote:
> On 04/07/2010 08:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Well, I would think that if you boot with the Intel adapter active, it
> > wouldn't power up the NVIDIA one. But I'm just guessing :)
>
> I guessed the same, until google found claims
On 04/07/2010 08:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 20:10 -0400, Mail Lists wrote:
>> On 04/07/2010 01:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 13:12 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Ah, wasn't aware of that. Thanks.
>>
>> Also I think without the switcheroo
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 20:10 -0400, Mail Lists wrote:
> On 04/07/2010 01:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 13:12 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> >
> > Ah, wasn't aware of that. Thanks.
>
> Also I think without the switcheroo the power consumption may be a lot
> higher (rumor
On 04/07/2010 01:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 13:12 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> Ah, wasn't aware of that. Thanks.
Also I think without the switcheroo the power consumption may be a lot
higher (rumor- is that true ?) - lowering power consumption on the
unused card may
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 13:12 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 18:11 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 09:14:09AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > > FWIW, I figure the support is currently reasonably useless for NVIDIA
> > > chips, as there's nothing fo
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 18:11 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 09:14:09AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > FWIW, I figure the support is currently reasonably useless for NVIDIA
> > chips, as there's nothing for which nouveau-on-NVIDIA is actually faster
> > than intel-on-In
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 09:14:09AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> FWIW, I figure the support is currently reasonably useless for NVIDIA
> chips, as there's nothing for which nouveau-on-NVIDIA is actually faster
> than intel-on-Intel in Linux, AFAIK. So aside from going 'ooh, it works,
> shiny', t
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 23:17 -0400, Mail Lists wrote:
> I just got an Asus UL30vt which has dual graphics (onbaord intel and
> nvidia) - I am aware of some work by Dave Airlie in this area -
>
> Anyone share the status of whether this might be usable (via cli or
> other) in f13 (or f12 for that ma
I just got an Asus UL30vt which has dual graphics (onbaord intel and
nvidia) - I am aware of some work by Dave Airlie in this area -
Anyone share the status of whether this might be usable (via cli or
other) in f13 (or f12 for that matter!)
Thanks!
gene
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fed
12 matches
Mail list logo
