Re: updating goffice to 0.9.0

2012-01-19 Thread Bill Nottingham
Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said: > Julian Sikorski (beleg...@gmail.com) said: > > I am going to go ahead and commit this. In case packages cannot be fixed > > in time, we can always introduce compat-goffice. > > I missed the fact that goffice-0.9 is the GTK3 port. So, yes, I'm going to

Re: updating goffice to 0.9.0

2012-01-19 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Sat, 2012-01-07 at 10:03 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote: > W dniu 28.11.2011 17:52, Julian Sikorski pisze: > > W dniu 28.11.2011 17:32, Bill Nottingham pisze: > >> Julian Sikorski (beleg...@gmail.com) said: > >>> Dear Fedorians, > >>> > >>> goffice-0.9.0 was released recently, along with new gnum

Re: updating goffice to 0.9.0

2012-01-19 Thread Bill Nottingham
Julian Sikorski (beleg...@gmail.com) said: > I am going to go ahead and commit this. In case packages cannot be fixed > in time, we can always introduce compat-goffice. I missed the fact that goffice-0.9 is the GTK3 port. So, yes, I'm going to need the compat version. I'll file the package review

Re: updating goffice to 0.9.0

2012-01-19 Thread Bill Nottingham
Julian Sikorski (beleg...@gmail.com) said: > W dniu 28.11.2011 17:52, Julian Sikorski pisze: > > W dniu 28.11.2011 17:32, Bill Nottingham pisze: > >> Julian Sikorski (beleg...@gmail.com) said: > >>> Dear Fedorians, > >>> > >>> goffice-0.9.0 was released recently, along with new gnumeric [1,2]. Wh

Re: updating goffice to 0.9.0

2012-01-07 Thread Julian Sikorski
W dniu 28.11.2011 17:52, Julian Sikorski pisze: > W dniu 28.11.2011 17:32, Bill Nottingham pisze: >> Julian Sikorski (beleg...@gmail.com) said: >>> Dear Fedorians, >>> >>> goffice-0.9.0 was released recently, along with new gnumeric [1,2]. What >>> is your opinion on pushing the update to rawhide

Re: updating goffice to 0.9.0

2011-11-28 Thread Julian Sikorski
W dniu 28.11.2011 17:32, Bill Nottingham pisze: > Julian Sikorski (beleg...@gmail.com) said: >> Dear Fedorians, >> >> goffice-0.9.0 was released recently, along with new gnumeric [1,2]. What >> is your opinion on pushing the update to rawhide ASAP? To the best of my >> knowledge stable goffice 0.1

Re: updating goffice to 0.9.0

2011-11-28 Thread Bill Nottingham
Julian Sikorski (beleg...@gmail.com) said: > Dear Fedorians, > > goffice-0.9.0 was released recently, along with new gnumeric [1,2]. What > is your opinion on pushing the update to rawhide ASAP? To the best of my > knowledge stable goffice 0.10 and gnumeric 1.12 should be out by the > time Fedora

updating goffice to 0.9.0

2011-11-26 Thread Julian Sikorski
Dear Fedorians, goffice-0.9.0 was released recently, along with new gnumeric [1,2]. What is your opinion on pushing the update to rawhide ASAP? To the best of my knowledge stable goffice 0.10 and gnumeric 1.12 should be out by the time Fedora 17 ships, so putting this into rawhide now would allow