On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 23:40:25 +0200,
Peter Boy wrote:
Fedora 35 comes obviously without Postgres module 9.6. Unfortunately, the
release change set doesn’t mention that. We need a clear indication and warning
of this.
That might be because 9.6 gets its last update in about two weeks. Thi
V Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 12:23:29PM +0200, Peter Boy napsal(a):
>
> > Am 24.10.2021 um 04:55 schrieb Samuel Sieb :
> >
> > I've never used the modules, but with rpms, you get the postgresql-upgrade
> > package installed as well in order to upgrade the database. Is this not
> > available with modul
V Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 11:40:25PM +0200, Peter Boy napsal(a):
> I just tested the dnf upgrade procedure on one of our standby backup systems
> which happens to have the F34 postgresql module version 9.6 installed.
>
> The module was overwritten with version 13 without warning.
I guess DNF report
> Am 24.10.2021 um 04:55 schrieb Samuel Sieb :
>
> On 10/23/21 14:40, Peter Boy wrote:
>> I just tested the dnf upgrade procedure on one of our standby backup systems
>> which happens to have the F34 postgresql module version 9.6 installed.
>> The module was overwritten with version 13 without
On 10/23/21 14:40, Peter Boy wrote:
I just tested the dnf upgrade procedure on one of our standby backup systems
which happens to have the F34 postgresql module version 9.6 installed.
The module was overwritten with version 13 without warning. Given the data
incompatibility, this is a very una
I just tested the dnf upgrade procedure on one of our standby backup systems
which happens to have the F34 postgresql module version 9.6 installed.
The module was overwritten with version 13 without warning. Given the data
incompatibility, this is a very unattractive practice. As far as I remem
