Re: unrecognized DWARF version in .debug_info at 6

2021-01-27 Thread Sandro Mani
If apitrace has its own old bundled copy of libbacktrace, better it should update it to the latest version, which is https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=tree;f=libbacktrace;h=7c4b8fb2fed26a7412bbed1f23976a0f568d0111;hb=HEAD Incomplete DWARF5 support was added to it in December 2019 and importan

Re: unrecognized DWARF version in .debug_info at 6

2021-01-27 Thread Jakub Jelinek
t-linux-gnu > > Start 1: libbacktrace_btest > > 1/6 Test #1: libbacktrace_btest ...***Exception: SegFault 0.11 > > sec > > unrecognized DWARF version in .debug_info at 6 > > > > Some dwz issues were mentioned in the runup to the mass rebuild, is this a

Re: unrecognized DWARF version in .debug_info at 6

2021-01-27 Thread Jakub Jelinek
e_btest > 1/6 Test #1: libbacktrace_btest ...***Exception: SegFault 0.11 > sec > unrecognized DWARF version in .debug_info at 6 > > Some dwz issues were mentioned in the runup to the mass rebuild, is this a > related issue? If apitrace has its own old bundled copy of libbackt

Re: unrecognized DWARF version in .debug_info at 6

2021-01-27 Thread Jeff Law
Test #1: libbacktrace_btest ...***Exception: SegFault 0.11 > sec > unrecognized DWARF version in .debug_info at 6 > > Some dwz issues were mentioned in the runup to the mass rebuild, is this a > related issue? More likely it doesn't understand dwarf5.  GCC changed from default

unrecognized DWARF version in .debug_info at 6

2021-01-27 Thread Sandro Mani
version in .debug_info at 6 Some dwz issues were mentioned in the runup to the mass rebuild, is this a related issue? Thanks Sandro [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=60502198 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org