On Wed, 15.12.10 08:44, John Reiser (jrei...@bitwagon.com) wrote:
> > I don't think there's a particularly good reason to use that filesystem for
> > other uses. Just mount another tmpfs elsewhere.
>
> mount() requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN and therefore an application cannot rely
> on performing mounts.
On 12/15/2010 06:40 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:19:38PM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
>> Also, the claim "The API for /dev/shm is shm_open()" is incorrect.
>> See the other message for the history. When something is in the file
>> system, then by default the file system APIs
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:19:38PM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
> Also, the claim "The API for /dev/shm is shm_open()" is incorrect.
> See the other message for the history. When something is in the file
> system, then by default the file system APIs (including creat, open,
> read, write, close, exec
