On 10/08/2011 09:15 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
> Milan Broz wrote:
> > Truecrypt on Linux uses kernel dm-crypt, so it is all mainly about
> > metadata format handling.
> >
> > I will probably try to add alternative to cryptsetup
> > to handle directly Truecrypt format (which is documented on projec
On 08/10/11 01:15 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
> Milan Broz wrote:
> > Truecrypt on Linux uses kernel dm-crypt, so it is all mainly about
> > metadata format handling.
> >
> > I will probably try to add alternative to cryptsetup
> > to handle directly Truecrypt format (which is documented on
Milan Broz wrote:
> Truecrypt on Linux uses kernel dm-crypt, so it is all mainly about
> metadata format handling.
>
> I will probably try to add alternative to cryptsetup
> to handle directly Truecrypt format (which is documented on project
> page, outside of source), the same way I already
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 15:11:06 +0200
Milan Broz wrote:
> Before this thread end in flame (as almost all discussions on this
> list :-)
>
> Truecrypt on Linux uses kernel dm-crypt, so it is all mainly about
> metadata format handling.
>
> I will probably try to add alternative to cryptsetup
> to h
On 10/08/2011 04:17 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 10/08/2011 12:55 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>> Is there any reason to use TrueCrypt, over the whole disk encryption
>> that Fedora already provides? LUKS "just works" afaict ...
>
> Does it? It is not easily accessible for a regular end us
On 10/08/2011 12:55 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Is there any reason to use TrueCrypt, over the whole disk encryption
> that Fedora already provides? LUKS "just works" afaict ...
Does it? It is not easily accessible for a regular end user and is not
cross platform.
Rahul
--
devel mailing l
On 10/07/2011 09:25 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 02:51:26PM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
>> On 10/06/2011 04:54 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:28 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth
>>> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> If I re
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 02:51:26PM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 10/06/2011 04:54 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:28 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth
> > wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> >>> If I remember correctly it's not that TrueCrypt is non-free,
On 10/06/2011 04:54 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:28 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>> If I remember correctly it's not that TrueCrypt is non-free, but that
>>> the license is incompatible with Fedora and upstream was n
Richard Shaw wrote:
> That's being rather pedantic... Yes it's considered non-free because
> of the screwy licensing agreement, however, the software is free to
> download and use,
Free of charge (gratis) != Free Software
Free Software as defined by the Free Software Foundation refers to freedom,
Do what thou wilt
shall be the whole of the Law.
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Richard Shaw
wrote:t, however, the software is free to
> download and use, it is open source.
(free (of cost) & open source) != Free software.
>
> Richard
charles zeitler
--
Love is the law, love under wi
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 15:54 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:28 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> >> If I remember correctly it's not that TrueCrypt is non-free, but that
> >> the license is incompatible with Fedora and
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:28 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> If I remember correctly it's not that TrueCrypt is non-free, but that
>> the license is incompatible with Fedora and upstream was not willing
>> to budge on that so it was re-branded
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:37 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
>> There was discussion back in 2007 of TrueCrypt, and the conclusion was
>> that the license was non-free, with several major problems.
>
> Just an FYI, unless you specifically want to stay aw
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:37 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
> There was discussion back in 2007 of TrueCrypt, and the conclusion was
> that the license was non-free, with several major problems.
Just an FYI, unless you specifically want to stay away from
problematic licences (i.e. Fedora) but don't have a
Hi Eric,
On 10/06/2011 10:37 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
> There was discussion back in 2007 of TrueCrypt, and the conclusion was
> that the license was non-free, with several major problems.
>
> There is now a BSD-licensed alternative to TrueCrypt called tcplay,
> which works with Linux using the de
There was discussion back in 2007 of TrueCrypt, and the conclusion was
that the license was non-free, with several major problems.
There is now a BSD-licensed alternative to TrueCrypt called tcplay,
which works with Linux using the device mapper:
https://github.com/bwalex/tc-play
I've suce
17 matches
Mail list logo
