Re: systemd not in critpath

2011-08-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 16:42 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Stephen Gallagher > wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 15:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Toshio Kuratomi > >> wrote: > >> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:13:48PM -0700,

Re: systemd not in critpath

2011-08-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 15:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:13:48PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: > >> Neither bodhi nor mash appears to consider systemd to be in the critical > >> path. Why is this? Is that

Re: systemd not in critpath

2011-08-25 Thread Bill Nottingham
Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:13:48PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: > > Neither bodhi nor mash appears to consider systemd to be in the critical > > path. Why is this? Is that the way we want it to be? > > > We should get that corrected. notting has

Re: systemd not in critpath

2011-08-25 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 09:36, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 15:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:13:48PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: >> >> Neither bodhi nor mash appears to consider sy

Re: systemd not in critpath

2011-08-25 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 15:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:13:48PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: >> >> Neither bodhi nor mash appears to consider

Re: systemd not in critpath

2011-08-25 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 15:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:13:48PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: > >> Neither bodhi nor mash appears to consider systemd to be in the critical > >> path. Why is this? Is that

Re: systemd not in critpath

2011-08-25 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:13:48PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: >> Neither bodhi nor mash appears to consider systemd to be in the critical >> path.  Why is this?  Is that the way we want it to be? >> > We should get that corrected.  not

Re: systemd not in critpath

2011-08-24 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:13:48PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: > Neither bodhi nor mash appears to consider systemd to be in the critical > path. Why is this? Is that the way we want it to be? > We should get that corrected. notting has ben promising to get a script that integrates with mas

systemd not in critpath

2011-08-24 Thread Garrett Holmstrom
Neither bodhi nor mash appears to consider systemd to be in the critical path. Why is this? Is that the way we want it to be? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel