On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Another way to look at it might be: Since a lot of people have libvirt
> installed (it's the default isn't it?) and hence forwarding has been
> on for many people for a long time, what harm is it causing?
RFC 1812
> 2.2.8.1 Embedded Rout
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> This is the general problem that IP forwarding is no local setting, and
> that the global setting has no inherent concept of ownership or
> refcounting.
The proper place for this seems to be firewalld, which should not only
control the
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:06:51AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> We really only wanted to enable forwarding from virbr0, to the LAN, but
> you can't toggle this per NIC afaick - you have to turn on the global
There seems to be per-NIC settings at:
/proc/sys/net/ipv*/conf/*/forwarding
Regard
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:06:51AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 07:25:50PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 11:32:13PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > Or in other words: I don't think it makes much sense to turn this on
> > > only at runt
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 07:25:50PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 11:32:13PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > Or in other words: I don't think it makes much sense to turn this on
> > only at runtime inside the service file as matthew suggests, as it hides
> > the fact th
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 11:32:13PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Or in other words: I don't think it makes much sense to turn this on
> only at runtime inside the service file as matthew suggests, as it hides
> the fact that the setting is made, makes it hard for admins to discover
> and overr
On Fri, 04.10.13 16:04, Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 02:15:07PM -0500, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
> > So, IP forwarding seems to be disabled by default in Fedora. docker-io
> > requires IP forwarding enabled
> >
> > With respect to packaging, we'd like t
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 03:21:07PM -0500, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 04:04:19PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 02:15:07PM -0500, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
> > > So, IP forwarding seems to be disabled by default in Fedora. docker-io
> > > requires IP fo
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 03:21:07PM -0500, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
> Josh (cc'd) said libvirtd would enable it, but we still need to take care of
> this for docker+lxc.
If we pick libvirt-lxc as the preferred configuration, we can maybe get away
with just documenting changes needed if you want to u
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 04:04:19PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 02:15:07PM -0500, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
> > So, IP forwarding seems to be disabled by default in Fedora. docker-io
> > requires IP forwarding enabled
> >
> > With respect to packaging, we'd like to have doc
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 02:15:07PM -0500, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
> So, IP forwarding seems to be disabled by default in Fedora. docker-io
> requires IP forwarding enabled
>
> With respect to packaging, we'd like to have docker-io installation set
> sysctl values to enable IPv4 and IPv6 forwarding
So, IP forwarding seems to be disabled by default in Fedora. docker-io
requires IP forwarding enabled
With respect to packaging, we'd like to have docker-io installation set
sysctl values to enable IPv4 and IPv6 forwarding:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011680
I was told on #fedora
12 matches
Mail list logo
