Daniel Mach wrote:
> This is nothing that can be fixed in DNF directly.
> DNF passes packages to libsolv to resolve the transaction and it can
> only cherry-pick packages for the transaction or set transaction flags.
Yes, I also think that this needs to be fixed at the libsolv level.
> If you wan
Igor Raits wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 08:38 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> The correct solution is to actually fix DNF. It MUST NOT take
>> Obsoletes from
>> outdated versions of packages (i.e., when there is a newer version in
>> the
>> repository which removes the Obsoletes) into account.
>
>
Dne 05. 06. 20 v 8:41 Kevin Kofler napsal(a):
The fact that Obsoletes from outdated packages are being considered is the
bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748187
but the DNF developers refused to acknowledge this and just closed the bug
when the issue was worked around in the fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 08:38 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > On 01. 06. 20 23:10, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > It was actually a bit tricky to come up with a solution for this.
> > > I
> > > hacked up a minimal reproducer with
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 02:10:12PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Another factor here is that DNF's behaviour when multiple different
>> available packages obsolete an installed package on update is 'greedy'.
>> If 'bar', 'moo' and 'meep' all obsolete 'foo' an
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 01. 06. 20 23:10, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> It was actually a bit tricky to come up with a solution for this. I
>> hacked up a minimal reproducer with empty packages, and experimented a
>> bit, and the solution I was able to find that works is to have systemd-
>> udev Obso
On Tue, 2020-06-02 at 06:37 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 02:10:12PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hi folks! openQA caught a subtle issue in a systemd update over the
> > weekend, and I thought it would be worth flagging up here both to let
> > people know
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 02:10:12PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks! openQA caught a subtle issue in a systemd update over the
> weekend, and I thought it would be worth flagging up here both to let
> people know about it and also to see if anyone has a better solution
> than the one I came
On 01. 06. 20 23:10, Adam Williamson wrote:
It was actually a bit tricky to come up with a solution for this. I
hacked up a minimal reproducer with empty packages, and experimented a
bit, and the solution I was able to find that works is to have systemd-
udev Obsoletes: systemd < 245.6-1. This se
Hi folks! openQA caught a subtle issue in a systemd update over the
weekend, and I thought it would be worth flagging up here both to let
people know about it and also to see if anyone has a better solution
than the one I came up with.
The issue affects this systemd update for F32:
https://bodhi.f
10 matches
Mail list logo
