s.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
ct.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
iling_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedorapro
raproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Do not reply to or forward spam emails back to the mailing list. You just
became part of the problem and many/most spam scanning services now
consider YOUR email to be spam. Gmail in particular makes it very difficult
to manage the spam status of individual emails (seems like you can only
report
Dne 17. 12. 20 v 12:37 Petr Šabata napsal(a):
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 12:27 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm unsure how to deal with this, so I'm asking here if anybody has ideas.
- I'm getting serious spam from fedora-notif on IRC about successful -
and a lot mo
x27;m unsure how to deal with this, so I'm asking here if anybody has ideas.
> > >
> > > - I'm getting serious spam from fedora-notif on IRC about successful -
> > > and a lot more failed - ELN builds for my packages (triggered either
> > > by ELN dev
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 12:37 PM Petr Šabata wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 12:27 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > I'm unsure how to deal with this, so I'm asking here if anybody has ideas.
> >
> > - I'm getti
Petr Šabata writes:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 12:27 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>>
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> I'm unsure how to deal with this, so I'm asking here if anybody has ideas.
>>
>> - I'm getting serious spam from fedora-notif on IRC ab
On 17/12/2020 11:23, Fabio Valentini wrote:
- I'm getting serious spam from fedora-notif on IRC about successful -
and a lot more failed - ELN builds for my packages (triggered either
by ELN developers or automatically by their CI)
I use email notification rather than IRC so I just ha
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 12:27 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I'm unsure how to deal with this, so I'm asking here if anybody has ideas.
>
> - I'm getting serious spam from fedora-notif on IRC about successful -
> and a lot more failed - E
Hi everybody,
I'm unsure how to deal with this, so I'm asking here if anybody has ideas.
- I'm getting serious spam from fedora-notif on IRC about successful -
and a lot more failed - ELN builds for my packages (triggered either
by ELN developers or automatically by their CI)
- bo
.cgi?id=810049
>>>
>>> It's worse because there are way more spam comments and they get
>>> amplified by the mails to the package-review lists as well ...
>>
>> Thanks to god they didn't spam to mailing list directly.
>>
>>> I was told to
On 31/8/20 21:54, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 4:51 AM Christopher
> wrote:
>>
>> This old issue (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177202)
>> keeps receiving spam every couple of weeks from a different account.
>> I've been tryin
On 31/8/20 12:51, Christopher wrote:
> This old issue (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177202)
> keeps receiving spam every couple of weeks from a different account.
> I've been trying to flag the spam comments as spam, and remove the
> flags they keep setting, and r
On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 at 14:22, Qiyu Yan wrote:
> Fabio Valentini 于2020年8月31日周一 下午7:54写道：
> > I'm getting *pretty annoyed* with a similar (but way worse) issue as
> well:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049
> >
> > It's worse because t
Fabio Valentini 于2020年8月31日周一 下午7:54写道：
> I'm getting *pretty annoyed* with a similar (but way worse) issue as well:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049
>
> It's worse because there are way more spam comments and they get
> amplified by the mails to th
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 4:51 AM Christopher wrote:
>
> This old issue (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177202)
> keeps receiving spam every couple of weeks from a different account.
> I've been trying to flag the spam comments as spam, and remove the
> flags th
This old issue (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177202)
keeps receiving spam every couple of weeks from a different account.
I've been trying to flag the spam comments as spam, and remove the
flags they keep setting, and remove their CC as well, so they don't
get follow-u
ow_bug.cgi?id=1644013
>>
>> Can someone maintaining bugzilla investigate the issue?
>
> There's a self-service way to fix this (I see it's already been done
> in this case, but here it is for the record):
>
> (1) On the comment click on the little label icon ("
te the issue?
There's a self-service way to fix this (I see it's already been done
in this case, but here it is for the record):
(1) On the comment click on the little label icon ("Tags").
(2) Type "spam" into the field and press enter.
This will hide the comment as s
Hello team,
It looks like spammers use closed bug report for their ads as seen in
this one:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644013
Can someone maintaining bugzilla investigate the issue?
--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Fedora Design Team
Fedora Design Suite maintainer
_
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/3831
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a
live CD or over the netw
something I can do to stop this spam?
>
> Another few hundred emails this morning too.
>
> Apparently if I could make this update "Obsolete" it would go away,
> but there doesn't seem to be any way to do that (nor to delete the
> update) through the user interface.
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 10:19:34PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I understood the message the first time, so I didn't need to be
> emailed 147 times (so far) about it.
>
> Is there something I can do to stop this spam?
Another few hundred emails this morning too.
Apparentl
I understood the message the first time, so I didn't need to be
emailed 147 times (so far) about it.
Is there something I can do to stop this spam?
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 10:15:06PM +, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> The following comment has been added to the nbdkit-1.17.1-2.fc3
5.7.1 : Recipient address rejected: Access
denied (in reply to RCPT TO command)
My original report:
> Subject: Bugzilla Comment Spam in Bug 1489554
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489554#c178 is a spam
> comment.
>
> Can you remove it?
Best regards
Geo
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 7:05 PM Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> If anyone spots any more, please open a ticket by emailing bugzilla-requests
> @redhat.com and one of us will clean it up.
Thanks Alasdair, that's good to know.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@li
nes I found). They are defeating our existing anti-spam
protection!
If anyone spots any more, please open a ticket by emailing bugzilla-requests
@redhat.com and one of us will clean it up.
Alasdair
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 11/01/2018 07:23 AM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A few minutes ago I was notified about a post in a closed bug. It
> turns out that the account that made the post has been sporadically
> spamming various bugs:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=user_activity.html&action=run&
On Thu, 2018-11-01 at 12:23 +0100, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A few minutes ago I was notified about a post in a closed bug. It
> turns out that the account that made the post has been sporadically
> spamming various bugs:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=user_activity.html
I have forwarded this to the Bugzilla owner. Thank you for the research on this.
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 08:20, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> A few minutes ago I was notified about a post in a closed bug. It
> turns out that the account that made the post has been sporadically
> spammin
Hello,
A few minutes ago I was notified about a post in a closed bug. It
turns out that the account that made the post has been sporadically
spamming various bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=user_activity.html&action=run&who=dragoelanie%40gmail.com&from=2018-01-01&to=2018-11-01&sort=w
Once upon a time, Florian Weimer said:
> This really should be a configurable knob in Gmail, but currently, it is
> not: Gmail rejects or drops such email occasionally, so you cannot fix
> things with filters. Unfortunately, Google support does not understand
> DMARC and that it's their systems w
* Todd Zullinger:
> AFAIK, there's no individual subscriber control in Mailman.
> It's applied to the list. (I'm nowhere close to an expert
> with Mailman3 though, so corrections are welcome.)
That's a pity (the lack of individual subscriber control I mean).
> However, it only affects messages
: Some User
Mailman will change that to:
From: Some User via users
It will store the original From header (I believe in
Original-From: but it's early in the day and that's from
memory, so it could be slightly off).
The advantage is that domains like @gmail.com which block
(or ma
* Todd Zullinger:
> On the users list we enabled Mailman's DMARC mitigations
> several months ago. That has allowed posts from users
> @yahoo and other domains with strict DMARC settings to reach
> list subscribers @gmail and other domains which honor those
> DMARC settings.
>
> It may be worthwh
Chris Murphy wrote:
> Semi-related to the "Attention Gmail users, please turn off HTML"
> thread; anyone *not* using gmail (e.g. all Yahoo email users) are
> having their emails put into spam by google mail.
>
>
>>This message has a from address in yahoo.co.
Chris,
On 2018-10-06 04:10, Chris Murphy wrote:
Semi-related to the "Attention Gmail users, please turn off HTML"
thread; anyone *not* using gmail (e.g. all Yahoo email users) are
having their emails put into spam by google mail.
Not only that but I have had cases where the
Semi-related to the "Attention Gmail users, please turn off HTML"
thread; anyone *not* using gmail (e.g. all Yahoo email users) are
having their emails put into spam by google mail.
>This message has a from address in yahoo.co.uk but has failed yahoo.co.uk's
>required tes
On 01/26/2018 11:16 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> I'm seeing many duplicate messages coming from r...@citadel.stu.neva.ru
> for messages from the past few days.
>
> Anyone on it?
Yeah, but note that a infrastructure ticket will reach us faster/better
than a devel list post.
I have blocked the
I'm seeing many duplicate messages coming from r...@citadel.stu.neva.ru for messages
from the past few days.
Anyone on it?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 17 July 2017 at 13:34, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do the list admins have any plans to combat the spammers that are spoofing
> Kevin Fenzi to bypass the moderation queue?
>
We are looking into how this is happening. Kevin is not specifically
subscribed as ke...@fedoraproject.org and only a few of the l
Hello,I received two spam emails, one in users and one in devs. Both
are exactly the same.If someone can take care of them, I would be
grateful.
Thanks,Sylvia
On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 10:41 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 07/17/2017 10:34 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> > Do the list ad
I have received a few on the development mailing list.
On 17 Jul 2017 6:48 pm, wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
>> I haven't seen any spam on the devel list. I even checked my spam
>> folder. Maybe the messages are being sent direct
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
I haven't seen any spam on the devel list. I even checked my spam
folder. Maybe the messages are being sent directly to you, not the
list?
They're being sent to 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org (whatever that
is). I can see i
On 17 July 2017 at 13:34, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do the list admins have any plans to combat the spammers that are spoofing
> Kevin Fenzi to bypass the moderation queue?
>
We are aware of this and have been dealing with whack-a-mole in trying
to fix it.
> Could we please at least hold his messages fo
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:41:13AM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> I haven't seen any spam on the devel list. I even checked my spam folder.
> Maybe the messages are being sent directly to you, not the list?
I am getting those messages as well :)
--
Athos Ribeiro
http://www.ime.usp.
as that would be.
Though I don't know what we would do if they start spoofing anyone else.
They're hitting desktop@ too, so we need to take care of both lists.
I haven't seen any spam on the devel list. I even checked my spam
folder. Maybe the messages are being sent directly
Hi,
Do the list admins have any plans to combat the spammers that are
spoofing Kevin Fenzi to bypass the moderation queue?
Could we please at least hold his messages for moderation? Maybe he
could manually approve his own messages, as annoying as that would be.
Though I don't know what we wo
then an infrastructure ticket and we can
>> see what we can do from there.
>
> It's gone now.
Yeah, I went in and found that almost all the spam was 1 user, so I
moderated them and cleaned all their posts from the archive.
kevin
> I forwarded your post to the list owners... they are at least the first
> line of folks to talk to about this.
Thanks! I'll try to keep that in mind (no promises=)
> If they can't clear things up, then an infrastructure ticket and we can
> see what we can do from there.
It's gone now.
Cheers
On 05/24/2017 02:00 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm not sure where it's best to report but today I wanted to probe the
> progress of Fedora MIPS [1] but since I'm not registered to this list
> I opted for the web archive. The first non-spam mess
Hi there,
I'm not sure where it's best to report but today I wanted to probe the
progress of Fedora MIPS [1] but since I'm not registered to this list
I opted for the web archive. The first non-spam message [2] I could
find is from March, everything after that is just noise.
I sup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:50:27 -0700
Kevin Fenzi escribió:
> On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:30:28 +0100
> drago01 wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > "iw-3.11-1.fc20 successfully untagged from
> > f20-updates-testing-pending by bodhi" ...
> >
> > Messages like this ha
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:19:00 +0100
> drago01 wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> > On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:30:28 +0100
>> > drago01 wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> "iw-3.11-1.fc20 successfully untagged from
>
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:19:00 +0100
drago01 wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:30:28 +0100
> > drago01 wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> "iw-3.11-1.fc20 successfully untagged from
> >> f20-updates-testing-pending by bodhi" ...
> >>
> >> Messages
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:30:28 +0100
> drago01 wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> "iw-3.11-1.fc20 successfully untagged from f20-updates-testing-pending
>> by bodhi" ...
>>
>> Messages like this has been annoying like forever ... why do I care
>> about such
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:50:27 -0700
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:30:28 +0100
> drago01 wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > "iw-3.11-1.fc20 successfully untagged from
> > f20-updates-testing-pending by bodhi" ...
> >
> > Messages like this has been annoying like forever ... why do I care
>
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:30:28 +0100
drago01 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "iw-3.11-1.fc20 successfully untagged from f20-updates-testing-pending
> by bodhi" ...
>
> Messages like this has been annoying like forever ... why do I care
> about such messages? I mean as long as nothing went wrong I don't
> really
Hi,
"iw-3.11-1.fc20 successfully untagged from f20-updates-testing-pending
by bodhi" ...
Messages like this has been annoying like forever ... why do I care
about such messages? I mean as long as nothing went wrong I don't
really care (any I am pretty sure many others don't either).
Can we make
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:44:54 -0600
Mike Chambers wrote:
> Did my eyes deceive me, or do the packages now get separated and put
> in their respected dir of their first letter, and not located in one
> dir now? Did the tree change or is this an error?
>
This did happen and it is not an error. I
excellent!!
2011/10/14 Kevin Fenzi
> I have moderated this user until they can fix their spam issues.
>
> kevin
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
--
Luis Enrique Bazán De León
-
I have moderated this user until they can fix their spam issues.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>>> "MF" == Mike Fedyk writes:
MF> Hopefully some better spam filtering can be implemented so that
MF> fedora's mail servers don't end up in spam block lists anymore.
Spam filtering will never prevent every spam from getting through. The
host f
Nov 17 17:58:28 mail1 postfix/smtpd[29706]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
bastion02.fedoraproject.org[209.132.181.3]: 450 4.7.1 Service
unavailable; Client host [209.132.181.3] blocked using
dnsbl.sorbs.net; Currently Sending Spam See:
http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?209.132.181.3;
from= to=
proto
70 matches
Mail list logo
