On 16.7.2018 16:43, Rex Dieter wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
Scott Talbert wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Miro Hrončok wrote:
A few days ago scidavis builds started failing in rawhide. Someone
mentioned here that sip was to blame for a number of such failures and
according to ko
Scott Talbert wrote:
>> Seems a lot of software expects that, so I'll (re)add the dependency
>> Requires: python3-sip
>> to python3-sip-devel
>
> Also, since you're now only packaging the one 'sip' binary, does it make
> sense to move it out of the 'python2-sip-devel' package to a
> python-agnost
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Miro Hrončok wrote:
A few days ago scidavis builds started failing in rawhide. Someone
mentioned here that sip was to blame for a number of such failures and
according to koschei they started to happen after the update from
sip-4.19.9-0.2.dev1805261119.fc29 to sip-4.19.12-2.
On 16.7.2018 16:49, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Rex Dieter wrote:
A few days ago scidavis builds started failing in rawhide. Someone
mentioned here that sip was to blame for a number of such failures
and
according to koschei they started to happen after the update from
sip-4.19.
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Rex Dieter wrote:
A few days ago scidavis builds started failing in rawhide. Someone
mentioned here that sip was to blame for a number of such failures and
according to koschei they started to happen after the update from
sip-4.19.9-0.2.dev1805261119.fc29 to sip-4.19.12-2.fc
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>> Scott Talbert wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>>
> A few days ago scidavis builds started failing in rawhide. Someone
> mentioned here that sip was to blame for a number of such failures and
> according to koschei th
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Scott Talbert wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>
A few days ago scidavis builds started failing in rawhide. Someone
mentioned here that sip was to blame for a number of such failures and
according to koschei they started to happen after the
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 16.7.2018 16:30, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>> On this last one at least - it appears that the python3-sip executable
>>> was
>>> removed in the packaging. I've got a query into Rex about whether what
>>> was intentional or not.
>>
>> The removal was intentional, but as I see it
On 16.7.2018 16:30, Rex Dieter wrote:
On this last one at least - it appears that the python3-sip executable was
removed in the packaging. I've got a query into Rex about whether what
was intentional or not.
The removal was intentional, but as I see it was used in more places, can
put back a c
Scott Talbert wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
>>> A few days ago scidavis builds started failing in rawhide. Someone
>>> mentioned here that sip was to blame for a number of such failures and
>>> according to koschei they started to happen after the update from
>>> sip-4.19.9-
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Miro Hrončok wrote:
A few days ago scidavis builds started failing in rawhide. Someone
mentioned here that sip was to blame for a number of such failures and
according to koschei they started to happen after the update from
sip-4.19.9-0.2.dev1805261119.fc29 to sip-4.19.12-2.
Hi all.
On 16/07/2018 10:04, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 15.7.2018 13:24, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> A few days ago scidavis builds started failing in rawhide. Someone
>> mentioned here that sip was to blame for a number of such failures and
>> according to koschei they started to ha
On 15.7.2018 13:24, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
Hello,
A few days ago scidavis builds started failing in rawhide. Someone
mentioned here that sip was to blame for a number of such failures and
according to koschei they started to happen after the update from
sip-4.19.9-0.2.dev1805261119.fc29 to
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 4:53 AM Rex Dieter wrote:
> You can always bump release and submit a new(er) build
I thought of that, but Kevin Fenzi killed it a few minutes later and I
was able to resubmit it.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraprojec
Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 6:34 PM Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Strictly speaking, it was a bug in PyQt4, which should be fixed now.
>> Please try again. (scidavis scratch build succeeded just now for me)
>
> Thank you for taking care of this so quickly Rex.
> Unfortunately,
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 6:34 PM Rex Dieter wrote:
> Strictly speaking, it was a bug in PyQt4, which should be fixed now. Please
> try again. (scidavis scratch build succeeded just now for me)
Thank you for taking care of this so quickly Rex.
Unfortunately, it seems that I will have to wait for t
Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A few days ago scidavis builds started failing in rawhide. Someone
> mentioned here that sip was to blame for a number of such failures and
> according to koschei they started to happen after the update from
> sip-4.19.9-0.2.dev1805261119.fc29 to sip-4.19.
On Sun, 15 Jul 2018, Rex Dieter wrote:
Hello,
A few days ago scidavis builds started failing in rawhide. Someone
mentioned here that sip was to blame for a number of such failures and
according to koschei they started to happen after the update from
sip-4.19.9-0.2.dev1805261119.fc29 to sip-4.19
Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A few days ago scidavis builds started failing in rawhide. Someone
> mentioned here that sip was to blame for a number of such failures and
> according to koschei they started to happen after the update from
> sip-4.19.9-0.2.dev1805261119.fc29 to sip-4.19.
Hello,
A few days ago scidavis builds started failing in rawhide. Someone
mentioned here that sip was to blame for a number of such failures and
according to koschei they started to happen after the update from
sip-4.19.9-0.2.dev1805261119.fc29 to sip-4.19.12-2.fc29.
According to the logs[0], sip
20 matches
Mail list logo
