Re: setterm impact changed (was: setterm syntax changed)

2014-06-26 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Felix Miata said: > New problem. Now that the kernel is no longer putting the display to > sleep and I can start X, I find that setterm command no longer > applies only to the vttys. It's now coloring my Konsoles, which I do > not want, and I don't see a way in the setterm man pa

Re: setterm impact changed (was: setterm syntax changed)

2014-06-26 Thread Felix Miata
On 2014-06-26 03:03 (GMT-0400) Felix Miata composed: On 2014-06-25 23:54 (GMT-0700) Samuel Sieb composed: Felix Miata wrote: setterm --background blue --foreground white --bold --blank 59 --store That moved the error: setterm: argument error: --blank Perhaps the on/off a

Re: setterm syntax changed

2014-06-26 Thread Felix Miata
On 2014-06-25 23:54 (GMT-0700) Samuel Sieb composed: Felix Miata wrote: I think what's order dependent is a bug in the rewrite to require the double hyphen where previously a single did the job. I tried this: setterm --background blue --foreground white --bold --blank 59 --store Th

Re: setterm syntax changed

2014-06-25 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 06/25/2014 11:52 PM, Felix Miata wrote: I think what's order dependent is a bug in the rewrite to require the double hyphen where previously a single did the job. I tried this: setterm --background blue --foreground white --bold --blank 59 --store That moved the error: setterm: ar

Re: setterm syntax changed

2014-06-25 Thread Felix Miata
On 2014-06-26 14:18 (GMT+0800) Christopher Meng composed: Felix Miata wrote: setterm --foreground white --bold --background blue --blank 59 --store produces nearly the same error message: setterm: argument error: --background Note that the argument the message apparen

Re: setterm syntax changed

2014-06-25 Thread Christopher Meng
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 5:57 AM, Felix Miata wrote: >> But yes, backwards incompatible changes suck, although in this case >> setterm has historically done something non-standard. > > > setterm --foreground white --bold --background blue --blank 59 > --store > > produces nearly the same er

Re: setterm syntax changed

2014-06-25 Thread Felix Miata
On 2014-06-25 15:02 (GMT+0100) Richard W.M. Jones composed: On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:06:10AM -0400, Felix Miata wrote: Was there good reason to change it? For well over a decade across all distros I've used, I've included this line in root's .bashrc, always: setterm -foreground w

Re: setterm syntax changed

2014-06-25 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:06:10AM -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > Was there good reason to change it? For well over a decade across > all distros I've used, I've included this line in root's .bashrc, > always: > > setterm -foreground white -bold -background blue -blank 59 -store > > The curren

setterm syntax changed

2014-06-24 Thread Felix Miata
Was there good reason to change it? For well over a decade across all distros I've used, I've included this line in root's .bashrc, always: setterm -foreground white -bold -background blue -blank 59 -store The current man page has changed to require "--" where "-" was sufficient previo