2010/2/25 Kevin Kofler :
>
> Well, if you had talked to us about it, we could have bundled the rebuild
> together with the big update, like we did for a couple other apps which
> needed rebuilds for some reason.
>
> But it doesn't matter now, I see your updates are queued for stable now, so
> it's
Haïkel Guémar wrote:
> I experienced few network hangs-up using Scythia/Qt 4.6.x, recompiling
> seemed to solve them. Since Qt 4.6.x wasn't in package collection yet,
> there was no ticket in RHBZ.
Well, if you had talked to us about it, we could have bundled the rebuild
together with the big upd
On Thursday 25 February 2010 07:46:21 Haïkel Guémar wrote:
> Le 25/02/2010 05:32, Kevin Kofler a écrit :
> > PS:
> > Running application X built against Qt 4.5.x with Qt 4.6.x SHOULD work.
> > Running application X built against Qt 4.6.x with Qt 4.5.x WILL NOT work
> > (and this is why pushing apps
Le 25/02/2010 05:32, Kevin Kofler a écrit :
>
> PS:
> Running application X built against Qt 4.5.x with Qt 4.6.x SHOULD work.
> Running application X built against Qt 4.6.x with Qt 4.5.x WILL NOT work
> (and this is why pushing apps built against a new Qt to stable BEFORE that
> Qt gets pushed t
I wrote:
> Uh, was this really necessary? Qt 4.6.2 is normally backwards-compatible
> with 4.5.x.
PS:
Running application X built against Qt 4.5.x with Qt 4.6.x SHOULD work.
Running application X built against Qt 4.6.x with Qt 4.5.x WILL NOT work
(and this is why pushing apps built against a new
Rawhide Report wrote:
> scythia-0.9.3-5.fc14
>
> * Tue Feb 23 2010 Haïkel Guémar - 0.9.3-5
> - Rebuilt against Qt 4.6.2
Uh, was this really necessary? Qt 4.6.2 is normally backwards-compatible
with 4.5.x.
In addition, you queued updates for this for F11 and
