Garrett Holmstrom writes:
> On 5/10/2010 15:46, Casey Dahlin wrote:
>> On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 01:10:18AM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
>>> Long time ago, all *redhat* packages were renamed to "system*".
>>> But three of them are still alive: redhat-lsb, redhat-menus and
>>> redhat-rpm-config
On 05/11/2010 02:20 AM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> If they aren't specific to only Fedora like fedora-release and
> fedora-release-notes are, why put "fedora" in the package names at all?
>
Besides switching from Red Hat to Fedora is fairly pointless since both
names have trademark requirement
On 5/10/2010 15:46, Casey Dahlin wrote:
> On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 01:10:18AM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
>> Long time ago, all *redhat* packages were renamed to "system*".
>> But three of them are still alive: redhat-lsb, redhat-menus and
>> redhat-rpm-config
>>
>> Should they switch to "syst
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 01:10:18AM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> hi,
>
> Long time ago, all *redhat* packages were renamed to "system*".
> But three of them are still alive: redhat-lsb, redhat-menus and
> redhat-rpm-config
>
> Should they switch to "system-" ?
>
> -thanks-
>
I think s/re
Chris Jones wrote:
> Although I am not familiar with what you've mentioned, is there a point
> for the change? I'm curious,
Trademarks.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Xose Vazquez Perez
wrote:
> hi,
>
> Long time ago, all *redhat* packages were renamed to "system*".
> But three of them are still alive: redhat-lsb, redhat-menus and
> redhat-rpm-config
>
> Should they switch to "system-" ?
>
> -thanks-
>
> --
> «Allá muevan feroz g
hi,
Long time ago, all *redhat* packages were renamed to "system*".
But three of them are still alive: redhat-lsb, redhat-menus and
redhat-rpm-config
Should they switch to "system-" ?
-thanks-
--
«Allá muevan feroz guerra, ciegos reyes por un palmo más de tierra;
que yo aquí tengo por mío cua
