Orion Poplawski wrote:
> But isn't that why Fedora exists, to push everyone along :)
>
> Sounds like it needs to be in at least F18 for that timetable.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Ruby_1.9.3
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ruby-sig/2011-September/000658.html
http://lists.fe
On 12/09/2011 02:11 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
>>
>> PS: why the hell are we still shipping this crap ? Ruby 1.9.x has been
>> the stable branch for almost three years, now. Upstream has decided to
>> stop providing