On 31. 08. 22 15:22, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 31. 08. 22 v 11:50 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
Hello license folks.
I see that Fedora's rpmlint is yet to be taught to understand SPDX:
python3-lxml.x86_64: W: invalid-license BSD-3-Clause
python3-lxml.x86_64: W: invalid-license MIT-CMU
Is this suppo
Dne 31. 08. 22 v 11:50 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
Hello license folks.
I see that Fedora's rpmlint is yet to be taught to understand SPDX:
python3-lxml.x86_64: W: invalid-license BSD-3-Clause
python3-lxml.x86_64: W: invalid-license MIT-CMU
Is this support tracked somewhere? I know openSUSE alread
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 7:48 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 31. 08. 22 13:39, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 5:50 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello license folks.
> >>
> >> I see that Fedora's rpmlint is yet to be taught to understand SPDX:
> >>
> >> python3-lxml.x86_64: W: inv
On 31. 08. 22 13:39, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 5:50 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello license folks.
I see that Fedora's rpmlint is yet to be taught to understand SPDX:
python3-lxml.x86_64: W: invalid-license BSD-3-Clause
python3-lxml.x86_64: W: invalid-license MIT-CMU
Is this su
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 5:50 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hello license folks.
>
> I see that Fedora's rpmlint is yet to be taught to understand SPDX:
>
> python3-lxml.x86_64: W: invalid-license BSD-3-Clause
> python3-lxml.x86_64: W: invalid-license MIT-CMU
>
> Is this support tracked somewhere? I k
Hello license folks.
I see that Fedora's rpmlint is yet to be taught to understand SPDX:
python3-lxml.x86_64: W: invalid-license BSD-3-Clause
python3-lxml.x86_64: W: invalid-license MIT-CMU
Is this support tracked somewhere? I know openSUSE already uses SPDX, so
rpmlint probably knows how to r
