On 02/17/2014 07:02 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 10:56:14AM +, Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:37:53PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
I don't think this calls for a mass rebuild or any kind of a rebuild
actually, nor should it be rawhide only. AFAIU this doesn'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 17/02/2014 18:02, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit :
> I think this depends on what rpm and yum are currently doing with
> the dependencies. As Panu says here:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065563#c1 if "-" is
> used in version or release
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 10:56:14AM +, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:37:53PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> > I don't think this calls for a mass rebuild or any kind of a rebuild
> > actually, nor should it be rawhide only. AFAIU this doesn't affect
> > runtime at all, only build t
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:37:53PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> I don't think this calls for a mass rebuild or any kind of a rebuild
> actually, nor should it be rawhide only. AFAIU this doesn't affect
> runtime at all, only build time, and affected packages can be just
> fixed at the same time if
On 02/17/2014 11:37 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 17/02/2014 10:24, Reindl Harald a écrit :
are such changes allowed within a stable release?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065563
A
Am 17.02.2014 11:37, schrieb Ville Skyttä:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Remi Collet
> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Le 17/02/2014 10:24, Reindl Harald a écrit :
>>> are such changes allowed within a stable release?
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_b
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Le 17/02/2014 10:24, Reindl Harald a écrit :
>> are such changes allowed within a stable release?
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065563
>
> As lot of package are using a bad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 17/02/2014 10:24, Reindl Harald a écrit :
> are such changes allowed within a stable release?
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065563
As lot of package are using a bad virtual provides / requires with a
double dash in EVR, and as a
are such changes allowed within a stable release?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065563
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fe
