On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 02:24:13PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> Took a bit longer to get there (some initial issues with the alpha
> needed fixing first), but rpm 4.9.90 has been in the rawhide
> buildroots now for a few hours with no apparent issues. Knock wood.
>
> As a reminder, at least
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 14:48 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 03/26/2012 02:30 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 14:24 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> >> As a reminder, at least the following packages will now need a rebuild
> >> due to the soname bump:
> >>
> >> jdieter
On 03/26/2012 02:30 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 14:24 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
As a reminder, at least the following packages will now need a rebuild
due to the soname bump:
jdieter deltarpm
Did I see that you took care of this one for me?
Doh... Sorry I fo
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 14:24 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> As a reminder, at least the following packages will now need a rebuild
> due to the soname bump:
>
> jdieter deltarpm
Did I see that you took care of this one for me?
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally si
Took a bit longer to get there (some initial issues with the alpha
needed fixing first), but rpm 4.9.90 has been in the rawhide buildroots
now for a few hours with no apparent issues. Knock wood.
As a reminder, at least the following packages will now need a rebuild
due to the soname bump:
