On Qui, 2014-06-12 at 11:06 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> how is this jujuxiii ?
I mean who is this jujuxiii ?
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-cond
Hi,
On Qua, 2014-06-11 at 12:40 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 17:19 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Qua, 2014-06-11 at 12:09 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 17:56 +0200, drago01 wrote:
> > >
> > > > Oh and xserver really .. I am the one that gets c
On Qua, 2014-06-11 at 23:36 +0200, Simone Caronni wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> On 11 June 2014 19:11, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > Hi, why not begin by a xserver rebase in copr ?
> >
> > Personally, because I don't feel like doing the work twice.
> But if
> > some
Hello,
On 11 June 2014 19:11, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > Hi, why not begin by a xserver rebase in copr ?
> >
> > Personally, because I don't feel like doing the work twice. But if
> > someone else wants to, sure, go for it.
>
> I could do it, also think about do it for eclipse-swt , but my probl
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:18 PM, David Airlie wrote:
>>
>> > To add some context the feature that I am asking for is working DRI3 +
>> > present ... with mesa 10.2
>> > it gives us GLX_EXT_buffer_age which finally fixes tearing issues in
>> > mutter that some user are experiencing
>> > without us
>
> > To add some context the feature that I am asking for is working DRI3 +
> > present ... with mesa 10.2
> > it gives us GLX_EXT_buffer_age which finally fixes tearing issues in
> > mutter that some user are experiencing
> > without using workarounds like forcing the compositor to always redraw
> To add some context the feature that I am asking for is working DRI3 +
> present ... with mesa 10.2
> it gives us GLX_EXT_buffer_age which finally fixes tearing issues in
> mutter that some user are experiencing
> without using workarounds like forcing the compositor to always redraw
> the whole
On Qua, 2014-06-11 at 12:40 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 17:19 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Qua, 2014-06-11 at 12:09 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 17:56 +0200, drago01 wrote:
> > >
> > > > Oh and xserver really .. I am the one that gets compla
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 17:56 +0200, drago01 wrote:
>
>> Oh and xserver really .. I am the one that gets complaints from users
>> that I can't fix because of our ancient x11 stack.
To add some context the feature that I am asking for is workin
On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 17:19 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Qua, 2014-06-11 at 12:09 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 17:56 +0200, drago01 wrote:
> >
> > > Oh and xserver really .. I am the one that gets complaints from users
> > > that I can't fix because of our ancient x11
On Qua, 2014-06-11 at 12:09 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 17:56 +0200, drago01 wrote:
>
> > Oh and xserver really .. I am the one that gets complaints from users
> > that I can't fix because of our ancient x11 stack.
>
> I'm not intrinsically _opposed_ to rebasing X in F20.
On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 17:56 +0200, drago01 wrote:
> Oh and xserver really .. I am the one that gets complaints from users
> that I can't fix because of our ancient x11 stack.
I'm not intrinsically _opposed_ to rebasing X in F20. But it's not
something we've done in any previous Fedora, and ther
12 matches
Mail list logo
