On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 6:47:32 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 1:38:57 PM CET Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On 11/02/2016 01:09 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > On 11/02/2016 12:51 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > >> Consider we have package 'foo-libs' that provide
On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 1:38:57 PM CET Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 11/02/2016 01:09 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On 11/02/2016 12:51 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> >> Consider we have package 'foo-libs' that provides set of libraries.
> >>
> >> How do I get all dependant packages (for batc
On 11/02/2016 01:09 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 11/02/2016 12:51 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>> Consider we have package 'foo-libs' that provides set of libraries.
>>
>> How do I get all dependant packages (for batch rebuild of dependencies after
>> package update)? Something which takes soft d
On 11/02/2016 12:51 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Consider we have package 'foo-libs' that provides set of libraries.
>
> How do I get all dependant packages (for batch rebuild of dependencies after
> package update)? Something which takes soft dependencies into account, too.
>
> Some packages migh
Consider we have package 'foo-libs' that provides set of libraries.
How do I get all dependant packages (for batch rebuild of dependencies after
package update)? Something which takes soft dependencies into account, too.
Some packages might depend on 'foo-libs' explicitly, some depend on soname
