On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 02:25:17PM +0200, Iain Arnell wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > If anyone fancies having a go at fixing perl4caml .. Debian reported
> > a bug compiling this with Perl 5.12 already:
> >
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> If anyone fancies having a go at fixing perl4caml .. Debian reported
> a bug compiling this with Perl 5.12 already:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=578800
>
It seems simplest to pretend that SVt_RV still exists on
On 06/01/2010 07:08 PM, Chen Lei wrote:
> 2010/6/1 Marcela Mašláňová:
>
>> Hello maintainers,
>> I started rebuild of packages dependent on perl. At the moment are packages
>> rebuilt in
>> test buildroot dist-f14-perltest. It's quite possible that some will
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 02:49:52PM +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> If your package didn't pass rebuild, we (Perl-SIG) will be happy if you
> fix it by yourself. If you can't, don't panic. We'll be looking at
> packages, which didn't pass. Also you can ask for help at:
> perl-de...@lists.fed
2010/6/1 Marcela Mašláňová :
> Hello maintainers,
> I started rebuild of packages dependent on perl. At the moment are packages
> rebuilt in
> test buildroot dist-f14-perltest. It's quite possible that some will fail
> with new perl-5.12.0.
> If your package didn't pass
Hello maintainers,
I started rebuild of packages dependent on perl. At the moment are
packages rebuilt in
test buildroot dist-f14-perltest. It's quite possible that some will
fail with new perl-5.12.0.
If your package didn't pass rebuild, we (Perl-SIG) will be happy if you
fix it b
