On 03/10/2013 11:26 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
I find that being a bit more explicit when specifying the files ina
package is a great way to catch so bumps.
Filed a ticket with FPC to add this as a guideline
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/266
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedora
On Sun, 2013-03-10 at 12:15 -0700, Conrad Meyer wrote:
[... snip list of broken deps ...]
> I've emailed all the relevant maintainers; protobuf 2.5.0
> (#883822) bumped .so from 7 to 8 and I didn't notice until
> after kicking off the build, mea culpa.
I find that being a bit more explicit when sp
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:15:41 -0700, Conrad Meyer wrote:
> API compatibility breakage, but I don't remember the tool for
> diffing shared objects — can anyone point me to it?
rpmsodiff
abi-compliance-checker
--
Fedora release 19 (Rawhide) - Linux 3.9.0-0.rc1.git0.4.fc19.x86_64
loadavg: 0.13 0.12
> [clementine]
> clementine-1.1.1-1.fc19.x86_64 requires
> libprotobuf.so.7()(64bit)
> [dmlite-plugins-memcache]
> dmlite-plugins-memcache-0.5.0-3.fc19.x86_64
> requires libprotobuf.so.7()(64bit)
> [dmlite-plugins-s3]
> dmlite-plugins-s3-0.5.0-2.fc19.x86_64 r
Compose started at Sun Mar 10 08:15:08 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[HippoDraw]
HippoDraw-python-1.21.3-6.fc19.x86_64 requires
libboost_python.so.1.50.0()(64bit)
[aws]
aws-2.11.0-13.fc19.i686 requires libgnutls.so.26(GN