-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/23/10 4:39 PM, Jens Petersen wrote:
> - "Bruno Wolff III" wrote:
>> Jens Petersen wrote:
>>> This is now done - so all rebuilds need to be done in the
>> dist-f14-ghc buildroot.
>>
>> Today's rawhide still seems broken. The report indicate
- "Bruno Wolff III" wrote:
> Jens Petersen wrote:
> > This is now done - so all rebuilds need to be done in the
> dist-f14-ghc buildroot.
>
> Today's rawhide still seems broken. The report indicates that ghc has
> been removed from rawhide:
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 08:16 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
> Yep ... In an ideal world, you would not have pushed packages to rawhide
> with a smaller NVR than that already in rawhide and no packages with a
> smaller NVR than that in older releases.
>
> Both cases seem to have happened.
The s
Ralf Corsepius wrote, at 06/23/2010 03:16 PM +9:00:
> On 06/23/2010 06:50 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 02:25 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
>>> Can we query what packages were "downgraded" due to this mass
>>> perl-5.12.0-rebuild
>>> retag?
> In most occasions, his would not be su
On 06/23/2010 06:50 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 02:25 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
>> Can we query what packages were "downgraded" due to this mass
>> perl-5.12.0-rebuild
>> retag?
In most occasions, his would not be sufficient. You would have to
rebuild them.
> Hrm, that's go
- "Josh Boyer" wrote:
>
>
> If you're going to bump ghc, maybe you should request a build tag so
> you can
> bump it and rebuild all the deps before it hits rawhide. See the
> massive perl update in this report for a case of this working.
Thanks Josh for the suggestion - I opened
https:/
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 02:25 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> Can we query what packages were "downgraded" due to this mass
> perl-5.12.0-rebuild
> retag?
Hrm, that's going to be tough. There were also at least one case of an
F13 update being built that was a newer version ( not just release )
than
> Compose started at Tue Jun 22 08:15:10 UTC 2010
> Broken deps for i386
> --
> ruby-RMagick-2.13.1-1.fc14.2.i686 requires ImageMagick = 0:6.6.2.1
> ImageMagick-6.6.0.2-9.fc14
> --
> * Tue Jun 01 2010 Marcela M
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 02:14:01PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
>Compose started at Tue Jun 22 08:15:10 UTC 2010
>
>Broken deps for i386
>--
If you're going to bump ghc, maybe you should request a build tag so you can
bump it and rebuild al
