Re: python packaging and EPEL: the %py_provides macro

2020-11-10 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Il 11/11/20 00:11, Miro Hrončok ha scritto: > On 11/10/20 8:21 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> On 11/10/20 6:22 PM, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: >>> Reading the python packaging guidelines [1] it says that "On releases >>> older than Fedora 33 [...] it is necessary to use %py_provides". >>> >>> So I th

Re: python packaging and EPEL: the %py_provides macro

2020-11-10 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 11/10/20 8:21 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 11/10/20 6:22 PM, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: Reading the python packaging guidelines [1] it says that "On releases older than Fedora 33 [...] it is necessary to use %py_provides". So I thought that %py_provides was necessary for EPEL7, but with tha

Re: python packaging and EPEL: the %py_provides macro

2020-11-10 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 11/10/20 6:22 PM, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: Reading the python packaging guidelines [1] it says that "On releases older than Fedora 33 [...] it is necessary to use %py_provides". So I thought that %py_provides was necessary for EPEL7, but with that macro set, the build fails with "Unknown

python packaging and EPEL: the %py_provides macro

2020-11-10 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Reading the python packaging guidelines [1] it says that "On releases older than Fedora 33 [...] it is necessary to use %py_provides". So I thought that %py_provides was necessary for EPEL7, but with that macro set, the build fails with "Unknown tag: %py_provides python3-calcephpy". In EPEL8 I