On Mon, 2021-03-08 at 19:07 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 08. 03. 21 18:33, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> > I'm just wondering: what's the benefit of packaging Python noarch
> > projects in Fedora?
>
> You can use them as requirements for packaged applications.
>
> > I can see the reason abou
On Mon, 08 Mar 2021 17:33:00 +
Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> I'm just wondering: what's the benefit of packaging Python noarch
> projects in Fedora?
Ob XKCD: https://xkcd.com/1987/
It is the same reason I build RPMs instead of installing Perl modules
directly from CPAN.
Jim
_
On the NeuroFedora side, having Python modules packaged in Fedora allows
us to produce the ISO images with all the necessary tools for a
particular domain (like comp-neuro).
I know that in FOSS we assume that everyone can use virtual environments
and pip, but that's not necessarily true in a multi
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 4:20 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 08. 03. 21 v 18:33 Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a):
> > In what way is different from installing them by pip? Does packaging
> > them worth spending resources (disk space, Koji cycles) and packagers time?
>
> 1. You know from where the
Dne 08. 03. 21 v 18:33 Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a):
In what way is different from installing them by pip? Does packaging
them worth spending resources (disk space, Koji cycles) and packagers time?
1. You know from where the package comes. Verified using GPG checks. Helps to
avoid Dependen
You could just run a script that runs dnf update --refresh, pip-review, php
composer.phar update and drush update. Instead of trying to use system rpm
packages for everything? For system, python, php and drupal module, etc updates?
___
devel mailing lis
Good point but most of those modules are updated to the latest by pypl on
https://release-monitoring.org/
You do make a point that it is more convenient to just do one update via more
than one. Good point. Thanks.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.
Same thing for all those drupal packages +modules drush and composer is all you
need see:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/KW4DDCDSCYZL5CXN76TCMDUFZVIJ5N7S/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorapro
Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> I'm just wondering: what's the benefit of packaging Python noarch
> projects in Fedora?
[...]
> In what way is different from installing them by pip?
· Users can install and use programs without caring about what
programming language they are written in.
· Programs
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 at 12:34, Mattia Verga via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> I'm just wondering: what's the benefit of packaging Python noarch
> projects in Fedora?
>
> I can see the reason about packaging architecture specific packages,
> since they will benefit of optimizations
On 08.03.2021 18:33, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
I'm just wondering: what's the benefit of packaging Python noarch
projects in Fedora?
1. Can be used in packaging of another packages.
2. Can be installed only once. Saves lots of disk space.
3. Can be easily updated to fix security vulnerabili
On 08. 03. 21 18:33, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
I'm just wondering: what's the benefit of packaging Python noarch
projects in Fedora?
You can use them as requirements for packaged applications.
I can see the reason about packaging architecture specific packages,
since they will benefit of
I'm just wondering: what's the benefit of packaging Python noarch
projects in Fedora?
I can see the reason about packaging architecture specific packages,
since they will benefit of optimizations and security flags that Fedora
uses, but noarch packages are simply the source code that gets compiled
13 matches
Mail list logo
