Re: python-SocksiPy (was: Re: non-responsive)

2012-07-25 Thread Fl
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 18:29:03 +0100 "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 09:12:42PM +0400, Fl@sh wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831743 > > > > Maybe anyone knows how to contact the maintainer? (His mail > > is not answer.) > there is still no answer --

Re: python-SocksiPy

2012-07-19 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
is: "bad Socks5Error exception" against the component python-SocksiPy. The bug report is almost completely incomprehensible. I'm not surprised the maintainer is ignoring it. If the maintainer(s) feel that an report is inadequate from an reporter they should simply request th

Re: python-SocksiPy (was: Re: non-responsive)

2012-07-19 Thread Fl
> That's still no excuse for not submitting a more comprehensible bug report > and a more readable unified diff (man diff --> diff -u …). > OK, I will correct it. -- Fl@sh -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: python-SocksiPy (was: Re: non-responsive)

2012-07-19 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 22:09:27 +0400, Fl@sh wrote: > > The bug report is almost completely incomprehensible. I'm not > > surprised the maintainer is ignoring it. > > > > Rich. > > > Not too difficult for maintainer to see these lines and see > the difference in exactly four brackets ;) > This ma

Re: python-SocksiPy (was: Re: non-responsive)

2012-07-18 Thread Fl
> The bug report is almost completely incomprehensible. I'm not > surprised the maintainer is ignoring it. > > Rich. > Not too difficult for maintainer to see these lines and see the difference in exactly four brackets ;) This maintainer does not respond, and may be not active for about a year

Re: python-SocksiPy (was: Re: non-responsive)

2012-07-18 Thread Fl
ot answer.) > > To save everyone the trouble of opening this bug, the summary is: > "bad Socks5Error exception" against the component python-SocksiPy. > > The bug report is almost completely incomprehensible. I'm not > surprised the maintainer is ignoring it. > >

python-SocksiPy (was: Re: non-responsive)

2012-07-18 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
tion" against the component python-SocksiPy. The bug report is almost completely incomprehensible. I'm not surprised the maintainer is ignoring it. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-df lists disk usage of guests without need