On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 10:25 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 08:22:50 -0800,
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 12:55:55AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > > When double checking the LICENSE file shipped with 0.10.1 final I noticed
> > > it was GPLv3 ins
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 08:22:50 -0800,
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 12:55:55AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > When double checking the LICENSE file shipped with 0.10.1 final I noticed
> > it was GPLv3 instead of GPLv2 as noted in the spec file. I am not sure
> > exactly w
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 12:55:55AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> When double checking the LICENSE file shipped with 0.10.1 final I noticed
> it was GPLv3 instead of GPLv2 as noted in the spec file. I am not sure
> exactly when the change occured.
>
Note, the LICENSE file itself is not enough to s
When double checking the LICENSE file shipped with 0.10.1 final I noticed
it was GPLv3 instead of GPLv2 as noted in the spec file. I am not sure
exactly when the change occured.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel