Re: pulseaudio maintainership status

2012-12-30 Thread Andre Robatino
Bruno Wolff III wolff.to> writes: > I'm using rawhide and sound is working. In VirtualBox, sound ONLY works when the guest is Rawhide, not F18, since only Rawhide has pulseaudio 3.0. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862976 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https:

Re: pulseaudio maintainership status

2012-12-30 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 11:13:30 +, Peter Robinson wrote: The term "If" is the problem. How many people are using rawhide, I know I am but not really with sound, I'm not against it but I also don't see the point in upgrading just for the sake of it. I'm using rawhide and sound is workin

Re: pulseaudio maintainership status

2012-12-30 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Brendan Jones wrote: > On 12/28/2012 08:25 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Brendan Jones >> wrote: >>> >>> On 12/28/2012 12:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Steve Clark wrote: > > > Then why is no one fixing th

Re: pulseaudio maintainership status

2012-12-29 Thread Brendan Jones
On 12/28/2012 08:25 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Brendan Jones wrote: On 12/28/2012 12:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Steve Clark wrote: Then why is no one fixing the identified bugs? Because Lennart insists on backporting only individual fixes to Fedora release

Re: pulseaudio maintainership status

2012-12-29 Thread Brendan Jones
On 12/28/2012 08:25 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Brendan Jones wrote: On 12/28/2012 12:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Steve Clark wrote: Then why is no one fixing the identified bugs? Because Lennart insists on backporting only individual fixes to Fedora release

Re: pulseaudio maintainership status

2012-12-29 Thread Peter Robinson
On 29 Dec 2012 01:48, "Chris Murphy" wrote: > > > On Dec 28, 2012, at 12:25 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Brendan Jones > > wrote: > >> On 12/28/2012 12:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >>> > >>> Steve Clark wrote: > > Then why is no one fixing the identi

Re: pulseaudio maintainership status

2012-12-28 Thread Chris Murphy
On Dec 28, 2012, at 12:25 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Brendan Jones > wrote: >> On 12/28/2012 12:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >>> >>> Steve Clark wrote: Then why is no one fixing the identified bugs? >>> >>> >>> Because Lennart insists on backporting

Re: pulseaudio maintainership status

2012-12-28 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Brendan Jones wrote: > On 12/28/2012 12:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> >> Steve Clark wrote: >>> >>> Then why is no one fixing the identified bugs? >> >> >> Because Lennart insists on backporting only individual fixes to Fedora >> releases as opposed to rebasing to

Re: pulseaudio maintainership status

2012-12-28 Thread Brendan Jones
On 12/28/2012 12:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Steve Clark wrote: Then why is no one fixing the identified bugs? Because Lennart insists on backporting only individual fixes to Fedora releases as opposed to rebasing to a new version, and nobody has the time to identify and backport the relevant c

Re: pulseaudio maintainership status

2012-12-27 Thread Rex Dieter
Julian Sikorski wrote: > Dear list, Dear Lennart, > > a week ago I have submitted a pulseaudio bug alongside with the patch > [1]. There was no response so far. > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888422 Updated submitted that includes the upstream fix, https://admin.fedoraproject

Re: pulseaudio maintainership status

2012-12-27 Thread Kevin Kofler
Steve Clark wrote: > Then why is no one fixing the identified bugs? Because Lennart insists on backporting only individual fixes to Fedora releases as opposed to rebasing to a new version, and nobody has the time to identify and backport the relevant commits. IMHO, we should just upgrade PulseA

Re: pulseaudio maintainership status

2012-12-27 Thread Andre Robatino
Brendan Jones gmail.com> writes: > If you look at the build status you can see pulseaudio is hardly > unmaintained. > > Rex Dieter has also provided a backport of the latest pulseaudio to use > with early releases. I'm sure he is very amenable to cherry picking > patches from a later release

RE: pulseaudio maintainership status

2012-12-26 Thread Dan Mashal
It is the holidays you know. :) Dan From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Steve Clark Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2012 8:54 AM To: Development discussions related to Fedora Subject: Re: pulseaudio maintainership status

Re: pulseaudio maintainership status

2012-12-26 Thread Steve Clark
On 12/26/2012 11:26 AM, Brendan Jones wrote: On 12/25/2012 10:50 AM, Julian Sikorski wrote: Dear list, Dear Lennart, a week ago I have submitted a pulseaudio bug alongside with the patch [1]. There was no response so far. Knowing that Lennart is busy with systemd these days, I proceeded to chec

Re: pulseaudio maintainership status

2012-12-26 Thread Brendan Jones
On 12/25/2012 10:50 AM, Julian Sikorski wrote: Dear list, Dear Lennart, a week ago I have submitted a pulseaudio bug alongside with the patch [1]. There was no response so far. Knowing that Lennart is busy with systemd these days, I proceeded to check the pkgdb status of pulseaudio. The only oth

pulseaudio maintainership status

2012-12-25 Thread Julian Sikorski
Dear list, Dear Lennart, a week ago I have submitted a pulseaudio bug alongside with the patch [1]. There was no response so far. Knowing that Lennart is busy with systemd these days, I proceeded to check the pkgdb status of pulseaudio. The only other maintainer with commit access is lkundrak, who